Hi,
after today's update of 9.1-STABLE I noticed that make build[world|kernel] are
taking conciderable more time, is it because the upgrade of clang?
and if so, is the code produced any better?
before:
buildwordl: 26m4.52s real 2h28m32.12s user 36m6.27s sys
buildkernel: 7m29.42s real 23m2
Thanks Chris!
It will take me some time do fully digets all this!,
but at least the picture is less murky.
danny
> >for example, this host has has 32G of physical memory ...
> >[snip - dmesg:]
> >real memory = 34359738368 (32768 MB)
> >avail memory = 32191340544 (30700 MB)
> >[snip]
> >an
Hi,
to run some tests, I reduced the physical memory by setting hw.physmem,
which got me to do some comparisons, and the more I looked around the
more confused I got.
for example, this host has has 32G of physical memory
from dmesg:
Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979,
> > happy that FreeBSD is among the selected organization.
> >
> > I am a third year student interested to work in the field of embedded
> > system. I applied last year and the title of my project was " Kernel Size
> why only in embedded system. smaller programs are always good :)
>
> And yes Free
> > never underestimate the human stupidity (mine in this case) nor of the boot.
> > pmbr will load the whole partition, which was 1M, instead of the size of
> > gptboot :-(
> >
> > reducing the size of the slice/partition fixed the issue.
>
> pmbr doesn't have room to be but so smart. It can't
sfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail.fig.ol.no id
> r0MCNtes050242
>
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:24+0100, Trond Endrest=F8l wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:21+0200, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> >=20
> > >
> hi,
> this is the output from gpart show:
> => 34 976773101 ada0 GPT (465G)
> 34 2048 1 freebsd-boot (1.0M)
>20824194304 2 freebsd-ufs [bootme] (2.0G)
> 4196386 12582912 3 freebsd-swap (6.0G)
>16779298 959993837 4 freebsd-zfs
hi,
this is the output from gpart show:
=> 34 976773101 ada0 GPT (465G)
34 2048 1 freebsd-boot (1.0M)
20824194304 2 freebsd-ufs [bootme] (2.0G)
4196386 12582912 3 freebsd-swap (6.0G)
16779298 959993837 4 freebsd-zfs (457G)
=>
> >> from first local disk at 0x07c00 and booting as with normal hard drive.
> >>
> > instead of pxeboot, try giving /boot/boot0
>
> works, except of delay.
>
> fixed from sources for 1s delay :)
may the source be with you :-)
btw, the above works for MBR, if you use GPT then you should use
pmbr
> does anyone know a PXE image (just like /boot/pxeboot) that can be placed
> on tftp server and the only thing it will do would be loading first sector
> from first local disk at 0x07c00 and booting as with normal hard drive.
>
instead of pxeboot, try giving /boot/boot0
> what i need is to be
hi,
as soon as I 'initialize' a virtual disk via gpart, even if nothing
is mounted, the pxeboot adds around 60s delay to show the boot menu,
- I don't know if the delay is in boot or pxeboot.
if I destroy the geom, the the boot menu appears inmediately.
any insight?
danny
__
[snip]
> any fix?
> > You have found the fix. Remove the WITHOUT_ options from the build
> > that keep it from completing. You'll be able to add them at installworld
> > time w/o a hassle. nanobsd uses this to keep things down, while still
> > being able to build the system.
> > Warner
>
reposting to hackers, maybe better luck here?
When using an amd64 host to 'make TARGET_ARCH=i386 buildworld' it seems that
it's using the wrong cpp, at least when building ioctl.c via mkioctl in
usr.bin/ktrace and having set WITHOUT_CPP(*). This used to work with
previous releases.
...
===> usr.b
> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
> --enigCDF012FCB4FC78B4732FDA45
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On 8/28/12 3:14 PM, Andy Young wrote:
> > I am relatively new to using IO monitoring tools and
> On Wednesday, August 15, 2012 4:46:28 am Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > > hi,
> > > this host has to disks:
> > > sa0> gpart show
> > > => 34 976773101 ada0 GPT (465G)
>
hi,
this host has to disks:
sa0> gpart show
=> 34 976773101 ada0 GPT (465G)
34128 1 freebsd-boot (64k)
1624194304 2 freebsd-ufs (2.0G)
4194466 33554432 3 freebsd-swap (16G)
37748898 939024237 4 freebsd-zfs (447G)
=> 34
Hi,
with 8,x an previous, I compile kernel with
options KDB
options DDB
options ALT_BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER
and so hitting control+alt+escape would enter the debugger on the console,
or CR ~ ^b on the serial console.
the same config on 9.1, only if
>
> --=-etjkwQYOTmf8U9KY0eW8
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> > > pacija wrote:
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > > Dear list readers,
> > > >
> > > > I am having a problem with pxe loader on FreeBSD 9.0 i386 release. No
> > > > m
> pacija wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > Dear list readers,
> >
> > I am having a problem with pxe loader on FreeBSD 9.0 i386 release. No
> > matter what value I put for DHCP option 017 (Root Path) in Microsoft
> > DHCP server, pxe always sets root path:
> > pxe_open: server path: /
>
> --047d7b10ce794d5a1004c08b261e
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> something similar is being done in the latest versions of qemu. There is a
> usb redirection module which is in the form of a client/server architecture
> where USB packets are sent over IP. These two modules commu
>
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2012-05-21 12:46, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > I need to control some lab equipment with several usb based controllers
> > (mostly serial) and was wondering if it can be done over IP, there is such a
> > thing called usbip, but couldn't fin
I need to control some lab equipment with several usb based controllers
(mostly serial) and was wondering if it can be done over IP, there is such a
thing called usbip, but couldn't find what 'server' is needed.
all the boxes I found are not cheep, but worse, only provide binaries
for windows, or l
hi,
doing
portmaster -a
today wants to upgrade php5.3 to php5.4 which I'm
not ready yet, so I dis-installed php5 and installed php53, but
now portmaster wants to upgrade the php extentiosn to 5.4 even though
php is 5.3.13.
what (if any :-), is the magic to convince portmaster to compile
t
> On 5/9/2012 10:46 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > Hi,
> > after a long time, I finaly got around trying to get the GSM/UMTS working,
> > but so far it thinks it's a mass storage!
> >
> > ugen0.2: at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST
> > spd=FULL
>
Hi,
after a long time, I finaly got around trying to get the GSM/UMTS working,
but so far it thinks it's a mass storage!
ugen0.2: at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL
(12Mbps) pwr=ON
bLength = 0x0012
bDescriptorType = 0x0001
bcdUSB = 0x0110
bDeviceClass = 0x
bDeviceSubClass = 0x0
> On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 02:11:25 -0500, Daniel Braniss
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All
> > There was some mention before that time stops under vmware, and now it's
> > happened
> > to me :-)
> >
> > the clock stopped now, the system is responsive, but eg
Hi All
There was some mention before that time stops under vmware, and now it's
happened
to me :-)
the clock stopped now, the system is responsive, but eg
sleep 1
never finishes.
Is there a solution?
btw, I'm running 8.2-stable, i'll try 8.3 soon.
danny
Hi,
Just saw that PCEngines has a new board, with SIM socket, but to get
it working, it needs a mimi pci express modem, and
from http://www.pcengines.ch/alix6e1.htm
'On Alix, only USB 2.0 connectivity is supported' ...
does this means the modem appears as a usb device?
cheers,
d
> --20cf300fb4297a2a2904aa0f78ba
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On 8 August 2011 11:30, Daniel Braniss wrote:
>
> > > On 8/8/11 5:33 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > > >> According to Daniel Braniss:
> > > >>> Trying
> on 08/08/2011 09:56 Daniel Braniss said the following:
> > Hi,
> > I managed to get boot to load the kernel, but the kernel can't find
> > the root:
> > ...
> > Trying to mount root from zfs:z/root
> > ROOT MOUNT ERROR:
> > If you hav
> On 8/8/11 5:33 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> >> According to Daniel Braniss:
> >>> Trying to mount root from zfs:z/root
> >>> ROOT MOUNT ERROR:
> >>> If you have invalid mount options, reboot, and first try the following
> >>> from
> According to Daniel Braniss:
> > Trying to mount root from zfs:z/root
> > ROOT MOUNT ERROR:
> > If you have invalid mount options, reboot, and first try the following from
> > the loader prompt:
>
> Have you set the "bootfs" property (see http://ww
Hi,
I managed to get boot to load the kernel, but the kernel can't find
the root:
...
Trying to mount root from zfs:z/root
ROOT MOUNT ERROR:
If you have invalid mount options, reboot, and first try the following from
the loader prompt:
set vfs.root.mountfrom.options=rw
and then remo
Im trying to install matlab R2010B-Mac-Linux under freebsd-8.2-STABLE,
having installed linux_base-f10-10_4 but keep getting:
rnd# /compat/linux/bin/sh ./install
Preparing installation files ...
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:
/dist/local/amd64.FreeBSD_8.2-wip/compat/l
> Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:40:11AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > > And that non-broadcast ethernet address is the MAC of your
> > > default router?
> > yes.
with dest_addr = INADDR_BROADCAST on the non diskless:
09:44:29.850576 00:0d:b9:00:72:a8 (oui Unknown) > 0
Hi Eygene,
> Daniel, good day.
>
> Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 05:04:27PM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > this code behaves correctly when run from a diskless host which
> > booted via PXE, but fails on a host that was booted from disk.
> > hint: the non working sends a
this code behaves correctly when run from a diskless host which booted via PXE,
but fails on a host that was booted from disk.
hint: the non working sends a packet with a non ethernet broadcast address and
an ip address of 255.255.255.255, the working version sets the ethernet address
to 0x
> On 6/7/11 6:33 PM, Dieter BSD wrote:
> >>> I've been working on fixing problems with printf(9), log(9) and
> >>> related functions. Today I tried converting printf(9) to write
> >>> to the log rather than directly to the console, unless the log is
> >>> not open, in which case the message is also
> On 5/20/11 5:32 AM, Bill Moran wrote:
> > In response to Daniel Braniss:
> >
> no, Who's on 3rd
>
what's on 2nd!
btw, there was something similar using unix commands ...
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
h
Hi,
We have a host, providing mainly http/postgres service, and its
swap usage is increasing. Is there any way to check which process
is using swap space?
some facts
it's running 8.2-stable/amd64
has 24gb of memory
zfs seems to be ok, arc size too.
top says 32G in use, while vmstat avm is
>
> --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 04:46:53PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
> >On Sat, 16 Apr 2011, dieter...@engineer.com wrote:
> >
> >>Suggestion 2: The kernel
re-posting here to see if I'm more successful:
--- Begin Message ---
I have been running the experimental nfs/mount for some time now, and
it mostly works, except with this particular case, where the mountd just
gets stuck:
mountd 11762 [dp->dp_config_rwlock] 8.93r 0.00u 0.00s 0% 1320k
and st
I asked this on stable, and since there were no takers, trying my luck here.
I see these messages:
ZFS WARNING: Unable to attach to gpt/r0/swap.
ZFS WARNING: Unable to attach to mfid0p3.
I have 2 'disks' /dev/label/r0 and /dev/label/r5,
the r0 is gparted such:
=>34 1952448445 mfid0 GPT
> On 18.1.2011 16:48, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > I have:
> > sf-03> gpart show
> > => 34 976773101 ada0 GPT (466G)
> > 34128 1 freebsd-boot (64K)
> > 1624194304 2 freebsd-ufs (2.0G)
> >
> :Well, since a server specifies the maximum file size it can
> :handle, it seems good form to check for that in the client.
> :(Although I'd agree that a server shouldn't crash if a read/write
> : that goes beyond that limit.)
> :
> :Also, as Matt notes, off_t is signed. As such, it looks to me l
I have:
sf-03> gpart show
=> 34 976773101 ada0 GPT (466G)
34128 1 freebsd-boot (64K)
1624194304 2 freebsd-ufs (2.0G)
4194466 100663296 3 freebsd-swap (48G)
104857762 871915373 4 freebsd (416G)
=> 34 976773101 ada1 GPT
> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
> --enig796DC9FCBCDF02E77B675B44
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On 14.01.2011 14:33, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> >> On 14.01.2011
> On 14.01.2011 13:37, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > and on the console:
> > GEOM: mfid0: the secondary GPT table is corrupt or invalid.
> > GEOM: mfid0: using the primary only -- recovery suggested.
> > GEOM: mfid0: the secondary GPT table is corrupt or invalid.
the provider in this case is mfid0
mfi0:
mfid0: on mfi0
mfid0: 953344MB (1952448512 sectors) RAID volume 'r0' is optimal
so I first use gpart:
gpart create -s GPT mfid0
gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr mfid0
gpart add -s2G -t freebsd-ufs mfid0
so far,
> :Try editting line #1226 of sys/nfsclient/nfs_vfsops.c, where
> :it sets nm_maxfilesize = (u_int64_t)0x8000 * DEV_BSIZE - 1; and make it
> :something larger.
> :
> :I have no idea why the limit is set that way? (I'm guessing it was the
> :limit for UFS.) Hopefully not some weird buffer cache
> > I'm getting 'File too large' when copying via NFS(v3, tcp/udp) a file
> > that is larger than 1T. The server is ZFS which has no problem with
> > large
> > files.
> >
> > Is this fixable?
> >
> As I understand it, there is no FreeBSD VFSop that returns the maximum
> file size supported. As su
I'm getting 'File too large' when copying via NFS(v3, tcp/udp) a file
that is larger than 1T. The server is ZFS which has no problem with large
files.
Is this fixable?
Cheers,
danny
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fr
> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
> --enig0AE178BF2380C8CAA3249E0C
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On 09/01/2011 04:38, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> >> There was a pos
> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
> --enig51B4786EC9D39188BAE04052
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="070003060308030201090207"
>
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --070003060308030201090207
> Content-Type: text/
> On 10/9/10 7:30 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >
> >> [ "..." ] is the same thing as [ -n "..." ] or test -n "..."
> >> [ ! "..." ] is the same things as [ -z "..." ] or test -z "..."
> >> I'll never understand why people have to throw an extra letter in there and
> >> then compare it to that lett
> On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 10:45 -0700, Dirk-WIllem van Gulik wrote:
> > On 31 Aug 2010, at 17:16, Sean Bruno wrote:
> >
> > > An issue in testing came up where we were trying to mount NFS
> > > directories from the same server, i.e. a machine trying to mount an NFS
> > > dir on itself.
> > >
> > >
Hi,
probably wrong place to ask, but I great minds lurk here :-)
I have been mirroing FreeBSD via svn since last summer,
svnsync sync file:///cs/svn/freebsd/base
then converting to mercurial
hg convert ... file:///cs/svn/freebsd/base ${HG_HOME}/bsd/stable/8 ...
since I can better t
> On 21.04.2010 10:01, pluknet wrote:
> > Hmm.. That's strange to hear.
> > We have in production a number of x3650m2: 7.2-R, 7.3-R (all amd64).
> > All runs flawlessly.
> > I'll try to boot it from head today if that matters.
>
> It was about 1.5 hour ago when i entered "autoboot" in loader pro
Hi,
While trying to find out why our NSF/ZFS servers now hangs about once a
week, I got hold of a similiar box, and got a bit more ambitious, I connected
it via 2 NICs, to complicate things a bit, the server boots via pxeboot (ie, is
datatless). After fiddling with the default gateway, addi
hi,
we are evaluating a Sun X2270, with 24 GB of memory.
initial boot shows:
Aug 19 09:07:51 x2270.cs.huji.ac.il kernel: real memory = 15032385536 (14336
MB)
(the date is wrong, but it auto-fixed via ntpdate later)
next reboots:
Dec 23 20:24:33 x2270.cs.huji.ac.il kernel: real memory = 17179869
60 matches
Mail list logo
