Thu, May 23, 2002 at 12:55:46PM -0700, Doug White wrote:
> On Mon, 20 May 2002, Damon Anton Permezel wrote:
>
> > 4.6-RC (which I am assuming is "release candidate") still doesn't
> > walk the entire PCI bus and find all devices for a Dell Poweredge 4600.
> >
The issue here is that there are nameservers out there which, with
the prior release of freebsd, worked fine with sendmail.
An incompatible version of sendmail is about to be foisted on an
unsuspecting public.
I don't care particularly one way or the other, as I now know
what the problem is, and
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 08:40:11PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 10:51:54AM -0500, Damon Anton Permezel wrote:
> > So, in violation of the networking "be liberal in what you accept and
> > conservative in what you produce", sendmail in it&
the world, syslog warning
entries might be a less unfriendly way to alert the unwashed masses
of the egregious violations of "correctness".
Cheers,
Damon.
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 07:15:46PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 10:51:54AM -0500, Damon Anton Permez
Since upgrading from 4.5 to 4.6-*, I have had problems exchanging
email with a correspondent at "austinenergy.com". It shows up as:
% echo hi | mail -v [EMAIL PROTECTED]
austinenergy.com: Name server timeout
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Transient parse error -- message queued for
f
4.6-RC (which I am assuming is "release candidate") still doesn't
walk the entire PCI bus and find all devices for a Dell Poweredge 4600.
Below, interested parties will be able to peruse the `boot -v' results,
followed by `scanpci -v1'.
I have a single Qlogic F/C card plugged into one of the PCI
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 03:45:59PM +1000, Greg Black wrote:
> Ian Noname wrote:
>
> | > The general rule is "including includes from includes is bad".
> |
> | Okay, it's time to point out that these are opinions, not rules, and
> | differing opinions exist.
>
> There's no shortage of opinions.
7 matches
Mail list logo
