Re: kvm questions

2003-06-09 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Vlad GALU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello. I am trying to write a monitoring program > which makes use of the kvm interface. procfs is significantly less evil, if you can get the information you require from it. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMA

Re: gcc bug? Openoffice port impossibel to compile on 4.8

2003-05-31 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Valentin Nechayev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Essential words are understriked. I can't imagine how it can be read > as "unsupported". I didn't use the word "unsupported", I said "deprecated&qu

Re: gcc bug? Openoffice port impossibel to compile on 4.8

2003-05-31 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Wes Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thursday 29 May 2003 00:12, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > May I remind you that K&R-style declarations have been deprecated for > > the last 14 years? > Funny, the last time I looked at a C language specification

Re: gcc bug? Openoffice port impossibel to compile on 4.8

2003-05-29 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
ten by the Linux bug. May I remind you that K&R-style declarations have been deprecated for the last 14 years? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hacke

Re: gcc bug? Openoffice port impossibel to compile on 4.8

2003-05-28 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
efore 1996 uncompilable. have you tried -traditional? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: 3 IDE devices on Promise card + FreeBSD == not possible?

2003-03-10 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
e manager with RAID functionality. > Is Vinum just a front-end to the ata system? No, it's completely device independent. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: booting from Promise tx2000: FIXED

2003-02-25 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
at this hasn't percolated down to -STABLE yet. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: debugging a repeating panic that does not produce a dump

2003-02-20 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
cessful. Its only on periodic that it > dies and find is always the process running. Its only with SMP as well > on this 'oldish' machine Hmm, it would be great to know what process was running when it crashed. Unfortunately, I don't know how to do that post-KSE... DES --

Re: debugging a repeating panic that does not produce a dump

2003-02-19 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
=160) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_conf.c:207 These numbers look perfectly valid (cuaia0). The only explanation I can think of is some kind of race, or some kind of corruption. Hopefully somebody more clued than myself will be able to figure it out. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To U

Re: arc4random() range

2003-02-19 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In any case, doesn't the name imply that it's 31-bits... Yes, it's a bad name. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: arc4random() range

2003-02-19 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
one less than a power of two. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: debugging a repeating panic that does not produce a dump

2003-02-17 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thank you very much, I will do so as soon as I get the dump. BTW, > could the act of giving the wrong params to dumpon cause the crash ? No, it wouldn't. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to

Re: debugging a repeating panic that does not produce a dump

2003-02-17 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
d the value of x, y and udev (as reported by gdb operating on the recovered core) > > How do you build your kernels - 'make buildkernel' or manually? > Always make buildkernel. I have a debug kernel built as well > (makeoptions DEBUG=-g) That's what I wanted to know. DE

Re: debugging a repeating panic that does not produce a dump

2003-02-17 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
ne you want is the last one in the list that has a lower address than c0174830. How do you build your kernels - 'make buildkernel' or manually? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: dynamic hints

2003-02-12 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
o examine a string directly via getenv() etc, those would not be > too late. It wouldn't be too late for loadable modules... DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: Some "security" questions.

2003-02-10 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
odified before release. The exact nature of that database is not important. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: OpenPAM and OSVERSION

2003-02-10 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
"Sergey Matveychuk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What a right way escape from PAM_CONV_AGAIN/PAM_TRY_AGAIN and relate code > from LINUX_PAM? Shoot the module author for using it, and Andrew Morgan (Linux-PAM author) for inventing it. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav -

Re: OpenPAM and OSVERSION

2003-02-10 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
onditional on the _OPENPAM preprocessor symbol. > What fix will be a right one? I can't tell you unless you show me what you believe needs fixing. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: OpenPAM and OSVERSION

2003-02-10 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
for PR. If you've fixed it in a way which requires knowing whether the system runs Linux-PAM or OpenPAM, you've fixed it wrong. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: OpenPAM and OSVERSION

2003-02-10 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Sergey Matveychuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What is OSVERSION num right after OpenPAM implemented? What problem are you trying to solve? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers"

Re: Help with understanding process state, context switching andsignals

2003-02-06 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
db(1) uses. You can get additional information about memory maps etc. from procfs. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: Modifying mergemaster behavior

2003-02-03 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
ff twice... no more than you already do (any reason why you don't use cmp instead of diff on line 815?) DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: Modifying mergemaster behavior

2003-02-03 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
ow has a new version-number > > in it. > This is an oft-requested feature, but I'm not sure how best to implement > it. Look up the -I option in the diff(1) man page. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: replacing GNU grep with UNIX grep.

2003-02-03 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Sergey Babkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Also the GNU grep has a lot more options, the most interesting > of them being -r. Unfortunately, GNU grep's -r option is broken (it does not handle symnlinks correctly). Try textproc/freegrep from ports instead. DES -- Dag-Erling

Re: End-Of-Life announcement for M-Systems DiskOnChip driver("fla").

2003-02-03 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
ith it. Read the announcement again. FreeBSD 5.x will still have DoC support, which means you have at least two years to grow tired of it before we stop putting out 5.x releases. By that time you will hopefully have realised it is a dead-end technology and switched to something that works.

Re: USB support for new HP printers?

2002-12-04 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: sys/dev/usb/ulpt.c === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/usb/ulpt.c,v retrieving revision 1.50 diff -u -r1.50 ulpt.c --- sys/dev/usb/ulpt.c 30 Oct 2002 01:18:58 - 1.50 +++ sys/de

Re: USB support for new HP printers?

2002-12-04 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
he OfficeJet. I have a d145, and while FreeBSD recognizes it just fine, and attaches it as a ulpt device, it fails to print (the process that tries to write to /dev/ulpt0 just hangs). I'll see if I can figure out a way to force the ulpt driver to bind to 7/1/2. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgr

Re: Increasing KVM

2002-10-28 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Ian Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How exactly would I go about increasing KVM? Read the FAQ. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: Accessing memory below 1 MB

2002-07-30 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I'm writing some graphics code (just for fun) and I need "legal" access to > the memory addresses below 1 mb. You can't access the framebuffer directly in FreeBSD like you can in DOS. Take a look at libvgl ('man vgl'). DES -- Da

Re: kern/40003: Panic on boot w/4.6-stable

2002-07-28 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Charles Sprickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 28 Jul 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > ad_attach() is trying to dereference atadev->param, which is NULL. > Is there any other info I can provide? I'll drive, you steer. :) No, this is Søren's cup of tea,

Re: kern/40003: Panic on boot w/4.6-stable

2002-07-28 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
ch() is trying to dereference atadev->param, which is NULL. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: allocating memory

2002-06-06 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
rements. Now I am trying mmap, and this lets me get to about > 2.5 GB of memory (again I ask for the memory in small increments). What > is it that causes these limitations? man limits, and see MAX{DSIZ,SSIZ} in NOTES. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send

Re: Is gethostbyname2() reentrant?

2002-06-01 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Peter Haight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If I link with libc_r can I use gethostbyname2() at the same time in two > different threads? Use getaddrinfo() instead. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscrib

Re: /usr/include/netinet/in.h

2002-05-09 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Ian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The general rule is "including includes from includes is bad". > Okay, it's time to point out that these are opinions, not rules, and > differing opinions exist. POSIX disagrees with you. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL

Re: Erm, since everyone managed to HIJACK my sshd thread! ;)

2002-04-25 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > -hackers is not the appropriate forum for code review. The patch is > incorrect and should be backed out. Never mind, I did it myself. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PRO

Re: Erm, since everyone managed to HIJACK my sshd thread! ;)

2002-04-25 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
he patch is incorrect and should be backed out. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: jail in 4.5-RELEASE: setrlimit() and blocked processes

2002-04-17 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
John Kozubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You can solve this problem by removing the setrlimit() call in postfix, > with the following patch: s/solve/work around/ The correct *solution* would be to fix setrlimit(). DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe:

Re: procfs issue.

2002-04-13 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It looks like the following delta (submitted by Tim J. Robbins) may > fix it: It looks correct to me, please commit (unless John has any objections?) DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMA

Re: 'rm' incompatibility with Posix.2

2002-04-10 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Bogdan TARU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Could you also try the NetBDS's 'rm'? If it does work like FreeBDS, than > I really don't know what to believe anymore. It doesn't, actually, it removes the symlink rather than the directory it points at. DES -- D

Re: 'rm' incompatibility with Posix.2

2002-04-10 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Bogdan TARU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 10 Apr 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > In my humble opinion, Solaris (and every other *nix) is broken in this > > respect, and *BSD is correct. > Except for OpenBDS. No NetBDS machine available, maybe some of you could >

Re: 'rm' incompatibility with Posix.2

2002-04-10 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
cd baz des@sex ~/baz% ls -l total 0 -rw--- 1 des des0 Apr 10 16:16 bar In my humble opinion, Solaris (and every other *nix) is broken in this respect, and *BSD is correct. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "

sshd UseLogin option

2002-03-13 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
ularly bad idea? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: Four misc. questions related to jail usage

2002-03-06 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
x27;ps -e'. Everything else will work just fine. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: Four misc. questions related to jail usage

2002-03-05 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
c is 20 + 16 * maxusers. > 4. Why is it that some linux utilities, run inside a jail, get the > hostname of the host machine, and not the hostname of the jail itself? It's a bug. It was fixed recently (in the last few days) in -CURRENT. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Un

Re: in-kernel HTTP Server for FreeBSD?

2002-02-17 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
s (employer's) time and money. Believing that it's worth more than the paper it's printed on, however, and bragging about it in an open-source forum, raises serious questions about one's intellectual acumen. Now, a CCNE, on the other hand... DES (neither of the above) -- Dag-Er

Re: in-kernel HTTP Server for FreeBSD?

2002-02-17 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
s don't make you smart, you know - though I wouldn't expect someone who brags about being an MCSE and MCNE to understand that) DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: in-kernel HTTP Server for FreeBSD?

2002-02-17 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > sendfile() isn't zero-copy, it's just two-less-copies. > zero-copy means "zero copy-operations within memory" To an MCSE, maybe. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to

Re: in-kernel HTTP Server for FreeBSD?

2002-02-17 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > well .. So let's turn the question upside-down, and ask "Is there a web > server or -accelerator for FreeBSD with similar performance as with khttpd > or Tux? Have you tried thttpd or boa? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgra

Re: in-kernel HTTP Server for FreeBSD?

2002-02-17 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Thomas Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Don't functions like FreeBSD's zero-copy sendfile() provide similar > performance benefits without the massive security issues? sendfile() isn't zero-copy, it's just two-less-copies. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL

Re: in-kernel HTTP Server for FreeBSD?

2002-02-17 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Hiten Pandya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there any In-Kernel HTTP Server for FreeBSD, like there is > kHTTPD for Linux? God forbid! Lots of hack value, sure, but not something you'd seriously consider for production use. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Make's ongoing effort to get his PR's closed...

2002-02-17 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
"Mike Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In my ongoing attempt to get my PR's closed, here's the list > again. They are listed roughly in the order of difficulty. Please send this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To

OpenPAM Caliopsis + integration patches

2002-02-12 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
ved issues. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: Ptrace and SIGTRAP problem

2002-02-09 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Zhihui Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 9 Feb 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > execve(2) in kern_exec.c posts SIGTRAP if the process has debugging > > turned on (which it does as a result of PT_TRACE_ME). > This is one time thing. It will be catched by the firs

Re: Ptrace and SIGTRAP problem

2002-02-09 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
ugging turned on (which it does as a result of PT_TRACE_ME). DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: Ptrace and SIGTRAP problem

2002-02-09 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
e child will get a SIGTRAP signal and core dumps. Can anyone give me a > clue how this is the case? Thanks! The parent must either detach from the child, or wait for it to terminate. See ptrace(2). DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: New feutures...........

2001-12-14 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
"Rafter Man" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2. I hope that in the furture the FreeBSD developers will rewrite > the system in C++. You need to have your head examined. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wit

Re: Junior Kernel hacker task: Floppy driver mode handling.

2001-12-13 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There exists a patch for adding a mode to our floppy driver to > add DEC RX50 media handling. Clearly a job for Jessem, don't you think? :) DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAI

Re: New vhost bugs.FreeBSD.org

2001-12-13 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
eister) -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: what is PSEUDOFS?

2001-12-06 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
him there :) DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: Bugmeister discussion list

2001-11-23 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 22 Nov 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > I've set up a [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > Any reason this can't/shouldn't be a freebsd.org mailing list? Mostly because setting up a freebsd.org mailing list takes

Re: Bugmeister discussion list

2001-11-22 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Gary Jennejohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This seems like a fatal name for the list considering what > buggers means. I know perfectly well what it means. I did say the list was informal, didn't I? :) DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: se

Bugmeister discussion list

2001-11-22 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
nisms for PR handling in the context of the FreeBSD Project. To subscribe, send the usual magic incantations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: forwarding

2001-11-06 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
run PPP over SSH. On the inside box, set up a single static route to the outside box and let PPP take care of the default route. The outside box should run natd or ipnat unless you have a spare IP address you can use for the PPP link. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: se

Re: Unix Philosophers Please!

2001-11-06 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In short: The data is tranfered into the kernel and dropped there. The data is never transferred into the kernel. There is no copyin() or uiomove() there. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: buildworld breakage during "make depend" at usr.bin/kdump

2001-11-01 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Guido van Rooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > May I aks which shell you are using? Zsh. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: Unix Philosophers Please!

2001-11-01 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
f the data will end up getting converted to heat by their equipment, but they generally have good cooling, so if you don't overdo it you should be OK. I hope this answers your question. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with &quo

Re: buildworld breakage during "make depend" at usr.bin/kdump

2001-11-01 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
"Eugene L. Vorokov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Uhmz ? Your shell is broken. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: truss vs ktrace

2001-10-20 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
e -l command-line option to kdump. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: truss vs ktrace

2001-10-20 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
ptrace() can only return one int at a time from process memory whereas with /proc/pid/mem you can read as much as you want in one go. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: New rc.d init script roadmap

2001-10-18 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Huh? Int on alpha is 32, and pointer is 64. I thought we were ILP64 on 64-bit archs, but you're right. And I ought to know better... DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wit

Re: New rc.d init script roadmap

2001-10-18 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
t header, I should have simply looked at the libutil Makefile. Thanks! DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: New rc.d init script roadmap

2001-10-18 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Here's a correct patch. Murphy's Law of Attachments, etc. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: Makefile === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sbin

Re: New rc.d init script roadmap

2001-10-18 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Your rcorder patch is incorrect. Here's a correct patch. Does anybody mind if I commit this and connect rcorder(8) to the build? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] I

Re: New rc.d init script roadmap

2001-10-18 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Your rcorder patch is incorrect. Here's a correct patch. Does anybody mind if I commit this and connect rcorder(8) to the build? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wit

Re: New rc.d init script roadmap

2001-10-18 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
ts (because our ints and pointers are the same size), but that's no reason not to do things right. Also, I don't see the point in munging the Makefile like you do - I think we can live with having a Makefile that's slightly (and trivially) different from NetBSD's. DES -- Dag

Re: My contributions to the close a PR campaign

2001-10-15 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Seth Kingsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Why not remove it after using it to restore the mixer state? It would > only exist to survive a reboot. You'd have to reset everything manually after a crash. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: se

Re: fastforwarding?

2001-06-28 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
vely slow) route lookup process. The packet flows > directly from one layer2 input routine directly to the opposing > layer2 output routine without traversing the IP layer. And more importantly, without traversing ipfw or ipfilter. In other words, don't use this on a firewall. DE

Re: What happens to a connection between a select and accept...

2001-06-24 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
in that socket's listen queue. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: What happens to a connection between a select and accept...

2001-06-24 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
n Linux that caused all kinds of nasty bugs and problems. There was one in FreeBSD too. It's been fixed; accept(2) will return -1 and set errno to ECONNABORTED, which you'd know if you'd RTFM. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAI

Re: Status of encryption hardware support in FreeBSD

2001-06-24 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
', or just 'openssl -help'. You'll be surprised... DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: Status of encryption hardware support in FreeBSD

2001-06-24 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
y if, as you say, they have a 4.1 version out now. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: Status of encryption hardware support in FreeBSD

2001-06-24 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
on. It helps, but it's neither sufficient nor necessary." A 3.x driver *could* be ported forward to 4.x and 5.x, but the required changes are not trivial (newbus, SMPng...) and you'd still need sample boards for testing and debugging, and docs for reference when you don't unders

Re: Status of encryption hardware support in FreeBSD

2001-06-24 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
similar at the kernel level, and as others have stated before in a different context, driver source does not constitute adequate documentation. It helps, but it's neither sufficient nor necessary. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: whois(1) patch for review

2001-06-21 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
ery-shortly-now(tm). Since Mike's patch is a style cleanup with no functional impact except plugging a memory leak, I feel it's better to commit it first, and merge in Alexey's patch later, after it's been reviewed by this forum. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: real time

2001-06-21 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
e code, then you've effectively got a {BSD,MIT,Apache} license (except for a few details about attributions and the naming of derivative software), and you might as well make the change in name as well as in function. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail t

Re: Your new web site

2001-06-21 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
David Preece <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is anyone close enough to drive round and have a quiet word? > "Netiquette" for instance. Or "asking for trouble". Or "lookity shiny new baseball bat"? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubs

Re: Query: How to tell if Microsoft is using BSD TCP/IP code?

2001-06-21 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
SDK? And doesn't this sound a bit circular? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: Changes to the /etc/rc* boot system

2001-06-20 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
NetBSD rc stuff instead of our own. I know that it won't work properly for a while, but it would lower the amount of effort needed for anyone to start hacking on it. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: Query: How to tell if Microsoft is using BSD TCP/IP code?

2001-06-20 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
dent on Linux would be forced to GPL their software or fold. Talk about bait-and-switch! It's for this reason, by the way, that the LGPL has been renamed from "Library GPL" to "Lesser GPL". DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMA

Re: Article Network performance by OS

2001-06-16 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
or some pocket change are. So we turned it back on. If you're not happy with that, put 'hw.ata.wc="0"' in your /boot/loader.conf and they'll be off after the next reboot. Or get real disks. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [

Re: strangeness in web interface of send-pr

2001-06-15 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
erity and priority. They are set by the submitter and rarely if ever changed by committers, and are usually far more indicative of the submitter's state of mind than of the PR's importance. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wi

Re: modified natd again

2001-06-15 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Urban Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Another strange thing is that when I try to use tcpdump it doesn´t show all > packets. No packets are "dropped by kernel" but tcpdump have received > packets but don´t show them. Could this in some way be related. Use the -n op

Re: import NetBSD rc system

2001-06-12 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Kevin Way <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just ordered a spare machine a few days ago. I'll install > -CURRENT on it, and start the integration. I've been > needing something to keep myself out of trouble. That's our new slogan: "FreeBSD - keeping kids

Re: Patented algorithm in FreeBSD

2001-06-11 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Every time I tease my housemate's cat with a laser pointer, I am > violating a US patent. (No, really.) I need to get a laser pointer... DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Tuning, security, firewall man pages up for review

2001-05-27 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > http://apollo.backplane.com/FreeBSD/tuning.html In the kernel config tuning section, you've misspelt NSFBUFS as NFSBUFS, which doesn't exist. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EM

Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries

2001-05-08 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
e -x option makes it slightly less so. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: FPU exception, kernel panic

2001-05-07 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
what's described here anyway - you'd see the kernel stack getting smashed, not an FPU exception. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries

2001-05-07 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 07:52:15PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > How about e.g. 'sysctl -a hw', which still shows *all* MIB's? > > Yes, b

Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries

2001-05-07 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How about e.g. 'sysctl -a hw', which still shows *all* MIB's? > At least on ref5 as of this very moment.. Yes, because '-a' means 'show all non-opaque' and 'hw' is ignored. DES -- Dag-Erling S

Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries

2001-05-07 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 07 May 2001 18:51:22 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Yes it will, with -X. The interesting question is why there isn't an > > option to make it display just one variable in hex, and why it doesn't > > prin

  1   2   3   4   5   >