On Tue, 20 Jul 1999, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
>
> Perhaps I'm missing something obvious, but since switches forward packets
> selectively per port, I would think it would be hard to sniff packets on
> any port, w/o administrative access to the switch to tell it to mirror
> data to a different port.
On Tue, 20 Jul 1999, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
>
> Perhaps I'm missing something obvious, but since switches forward packets
> selectively per port, I would think it would be hard to sniff packets on
> any port, w/o administrative access to the switch to tell it to mirror
> data to a different port.
Well, I'm looking into doing striping and mirroring on a new webserver
I am bringing up (3.2-stable) and I have to say, vinum looks very cool.
It took me like half an hour to get it going from first contact.
Nice job Greg -- very straightforward.
Now, the official status of vinum is still alpha,
Well, I'm looking into doing striping and mirroring on a new webserver
I am bringing up (3.2-stable) and I have to say, vinum looks very cool.
It took me like half an hour to get it going from first contact.
Nice job Greg -- very straightforward.
Now, the official status of vinum is still alpha,
On Sun, 16 May 1999, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Alex Le Heux writes:
> > Maybe I'm completely wrong here, but didn't I read somewhere that with
> > softupdates it would theoretically be possible to boot the system before
> > the fsck and fsck while it's running?
>
> Yes.. if you make the assumptions t
5 matches
Mail list logo
