RE: Microsoft performance (was: All this and documentation too? (was: cvs commit: src/sys/isa sio.c))

1999-06-26 Thread Constantine Shkolny
On Saturday, June 26, 1999 8:08 AM, Nick Hibma [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > Programmers need documentation too. > > And they are going to scream like mad if there isn't any. But in the end > they start reading the code anyway, even if there is docu, because they > don't trust anything but

RE: Microsoft performance (was: All this and documentation too? (was: cvs commit: src/sys/isa sio.c))

1999-06-26 Thread Constantine Shkolny
On Saturday, June 26, 1999 8:08 AM, Nick Hibma [SMTP:hi...@skylink.it] wrote: > > Programmers need documentation too. > > And they are going to scream like mad if there isn't any. But in the end > they start reading the code anyway, even if there is docu, because they > don't trust anything but th

RE: ipfilter (was: RE: Introduction)

1999-06-20 Thread Constantine Shkolny
On Sunday, June 20, 1999 7:22 AM, Luigi Rizzo [SMTP:lu...@labinfo.iet.unipi.it] wrote: > > This means that IP filters need to grab some of IP packets, process > > them on a specialized prosessor and then re-inject them into the IP > > packet stream. That is, the filter may decide to convert the pa

ipfilter (was: RE: Introduction)

1999-06-19 Thread Constantine Shkolny
Hi All, I'm now analyzing ipfilter in 3.2 and our goal is to port our IPSec/firewall. I'm still in the beginning of reading the code so, at this time, I can't yet tell how nice it fits our needs. I just have some concerns which I'd like the people who are going to re-design the ipfilter to hear. I