When trying to run ethereal I get the message
%./ethereal
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libcrypto.so.2" not found
Anyone know which package I can get this from???
Alwyn Goodloe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe free
I am porting an aplication to 4.1 that uses ftime. According to man I
should be able to link with libcompat and get the library. For somereason
this doesn't seem to work is the manual wrong.
Alwyn Goodloe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "u
set?? That's why I'm
posing the question.
Alwyn Goodloe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
must be received in this time frame???
This isnot the usual dynamic tretransmission timmer which might make
sense for SYN packts.
It seems like a retransmission timer should be set?? That's why I'm
posing the question.
Alwyn Goodloe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail
We have several systems like our Micron ClientPros running FreeBSD.
These machines have the Intel 82810E chip in it and what seems forever
there has only been XFree86 drivers for the Linux.
Is my info out of date??
Has anyone found a workaround ??
To be honest I'm tired of all the sn
Guys,
I've made great progress in buiding the JDK but get the error (see
below) . I have Motif and the development toolkit installed. Anyone seen
this in their builds.
Alwyn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<<>>Recursively making ./../../ext/i18n/build/freebsd all...
gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/por
Sorry I forgot to include the output see below.
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Alwyn Goodloe wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
> I've asked this on the questions list but no one there could resolve the
> problem so I thought I would ask it on the hackers list.
>
> First note I h
Hi folks,
I've asked this on the questions list but no one there could resolve the
problem so I thought I would ask it on the hackers list.
First note I have all the ports required.
I've had the following problems in building the jdk:
There were problems with ALT_BOOTDIR finding t
ve
read it seems that once one divert rule is executed then the other dirvert
rules won't get executed. Am I correct about this.
Any ideas how I can get both divert rules to fire.
Alwyn Goodloe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe fre
This is my last fragmentation question I swear :-)
When diverting udp packets which are larger than MTU(1500) ipfw seems to
divert the first and reject the second.
Here is tcpdump of the packets:
23:41:05.670408 192.168.1.3.1128 > 192.168.5.12.3322: udp 1474 (frag 4127:1480@
0+)
23:41:0
Having run lsof I can verify that the program IS reading on that port
number.
Has anyone else on the hacker list had problems with diverting
fragmented datagrams??
Alwyn Goodloe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Patrick Bihan-Faou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry to state somet
Thanks for the suggestion I will give lsof a shot to see.
I think the port binding is correct, otherwise I don't think it would
work when datagrams aren't fragmented. Like I said the code works fine
for datagrams < MTU ==> not fragmented but fails when they are. That being
said it NEVER HUR
where I was redirecting all IP packets.
Any suggestions as to what stupid thing I have failed to do here.
Alwyn Goodloe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here is the important code fragments:
Note: I have played with the MAX_PACKET_SIZE in hopes that it would make some
difference but to no avai
I was originally diverting udp packets heading to a particular port then
I flushed the ipfw and tried:
ipfw add 6 divert 4422 ip all from any to any in
and still no packets are received by recvfrom(). Would the port numbers
matter for this case.
Alwyn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 24 Ja
I have been using divert sockets for a while sending small (< MTU) UDP
packets and everything worked fine. Now that the UDP packets are larger
(>MTU = 1500) and hence fragmentation is taking place there seems to be a
problem. tcpdump tells me that the fragmented packets arrive but it seems
that th
on to those who do this sort of thing alot. As a last resort I was just
going to hack the ip_fw_chk() fn (in ip_fw.c). Of course I don't like
hacking systems internals if there is an easy way around it.
Thanks for your help.
Alwyn Goodloe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: se
thing similar do you have any advice.
ii) Anyone know where I should start hacking. Would it be best to try to
hack the firewall code or the ipforwarding code
Any such advise would be helpful.
Alwyn Goodloe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "u
IP_ROUTER_ALERT option that can be applied by
Root users to IP sockets to intercept all forwarded packets with the
Router Alert option. Does it work similarly for FreeBSD.
Alwyn Goodloe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers&qu
18 matches
Mail list logo
