andle an Intel 510 SSD running at
full SATA-III speed but an Intel 520 pushed it over the brink.
-Original Message-
From: Steven Hartland [mailto:kill...@multiplay.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 7:52 AM
To: Caza, Aaron; freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: AHCI Timeouts on SATA III
hi,
first of; grats on getting the project. very interesting.
> * Can you recommend a secure way of sending a report from a FreeBSD system
> to the Central Collector machine?
i don't know if the use of a gnu tool would conflict with FreeBSD
politics but you could use tar(1) or an equivalent and G
I've got a couple of Intel 520 SSDs that I'm running on an Intel Sandy-bridge
based system(Core i5-2500K H67 chipset). Unfortunately, the drives experience
AHCI Timeouts when connected to the SATA III ports. If, however, I connect the
drives to the SATA-II ports on the same system the drives d
27;m not certain where the next place I should be checking is.
FYI: This is on an AMD Athlon II X2 235e Processor @ 2.7GHz running the SMP
kernel. Setting kern.smp.disabled=1 in /boot/loader.conf did not change the
behavior.
Anyone got any useful pointers?
Thanks in advance,
Aaron
This message
On 7/11/05, Giovanni P. Tirloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd be able to work on this server right now and add the second disk when
> it arrives without reinstalling everything.
Mirroring via software (gmirror) is not an option?
aaron.glenn
___
free
On 7/11/05, Giovanni P. Tirloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But I'd like to ask if it'd theoretically be possible to create the RAID1
> array (ar0) with only one disk and add the second one later? It'd work
> like a broken array for some time. It's just an idea :)
What is the advantage of buildi
tual consoles, flags=0x300>
vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0
Timecounter "TSC" frequency 996849075 Hz quality 800
Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec
acd0: CDROM at ata0-master PIO4
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/idad0s2a
Thanks,
Aaron
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:06:53 -0600 (CST), H. S.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I stated previously, I'm not much of a C programmer, but I can do some
> coding. I've been thinking into changing the core of the system a bit to
> return errors if some information is accessed by a normal user. I'd lik
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 08:56:29 -0600, Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is anyone working on this, or would someone like to work on it? I am not
> much of a code guru, but I have the resources to test this technology under
> all types of loads, and we are currently using a commercial soft
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 11:51:10 +0100, Devon H. O'Dell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Justin Hopper wrote:
> Correct. 5.x does not have this feature; Aaron, please read for yourself
> before you are rude towards others.
Turn's out *I* missed something. I'd hav
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:23:24 -0800, Justin Hopper
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Two questions:
>
> 1) Is there any formal plans to incorporate the functionality of jails
> binding multiple IPs into the FreeBSD base any time soon?
Someone hasn't read up on 5.x...
> 2) Has anyone used Pawel's multi
Add Western Digital Raptors to the list as well. However I have not
had a problem since 5.3-BETA3.
aaron.glenn
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:57:33 +, Mikhail P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 29 October 2004 16:50, Mikhail P. wrote:
> > Perhaps it is only Seagate <-> FreeBSD5-related. Same d
I used to get that error prior to 5.3-BETA3 (5.2.1-RELEASE, and all
previous 5.3-BETA's). Randomly after reboot the machine would spew
about 100 of these and then hardlock. I've got two identical boxes
running BETA3 and BETA7 without any issues. Intel 6300ESB controller
and Western Digital "Enterp
I take it you've read the Handbook regarding serial console access?
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/serialconsole-setup.html
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/console-server/freebsd.html
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 09:52:38 -0500, Bob Willcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
m interested in doing so, please drop me a note if you have
comments or ideas on the best approach.
--Aaron
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
We have two systems with this motherboard. Id recommend looking for a
different motherboard. If you find one in the same class let me know
what you find Im looking too for our next set of servers.
-If you touch anything the bios resets to the default boot order. Its
impossible to keep it from re
On 25 Jul 2003 13:06:28 -0500, "Russell Cattelan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> How does one set the serial speed of the console.
> I changed the boot loader speed to 57600 in make.conf
> but the kernel seems to chose random speeds each time
> it's booted.
> Sometimes it's 9600 sometimes it 115200 o
I figured I'd stop here first, and didn't want to
cross-post to CURRENT, but I'm hoping someone can
offer a little illumination on a problem I'm having.
I'm running -CURRENT from Oct 8th (same problem on
CURRENT builds from August to present) on a Dell
Inspiron 4000 and ever since I switched from
I got around to looking through the source and such, and noticed I
can't seem to find the source to uptime...what distribution is it in
on the CDROM?
--
Aaron Angel [EMAIL PROTECTED], AQUARIUS Manager @ www.aquarius.null
[ "We teach children to look both ways when they cross the
well.. (but my memory of linux programming times is a bit fainted already).
aaron.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
automatically?
If not this is not what we want then we have the following problem:
#include
#include
works
but
#include
#include
does not work.
... hm... wondering if this what we want
aaron.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers&qu
Hello; I have this quirky piece of serial equipment that I'm trying to
figure out how to work. I'm attempting to write a simple program that
sends a string of text given on the cmdline out to the serial port to
a 132x80 ANSI(?) serial display
The problem I think I'm having is with hardware flow
about everywhere else I can think of to find a solution but have not had
any luck. Below I have two back traces, and the output of dmesg.
I would like to thank all the developers and hackers which have helped
create my favorite operating system
Thank You
Aaron
Here is the back trace I
initely see your point.
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, Aaron Smith wrote:
>
> > I got sick of (presumably) warez people probing my anonymous ftp site and
> > dropping all kinds of hard-to-delete trash in incoming, so I patched my
> > ftpd to only allow directories to start with alph
"Why can't I upload my file?" It
should probably test whether the user is anonymous.
If people actually would use such an ftpd option, I'll clean it up and
submit a new patch with doc changes.
Aaron
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 01:02:24PM -0800, Michael Smith wrote:
>
&g
I'd share.
Combining this with a umask that doesn't allow reading uploaded files keeps
things reasonably well in hand.
--Aaron
Index: ftpd.c
===
RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpd.c,v
retrieving revision 1.62.2.15
diff -
wcontent&id=1
- aaron
-
click46[wp] - AIM the click46 - ICQ 43450396
webpimps.net | bsdatwork.com | nerdserve.net
moderator - o/c cooling forum @ hardforum.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
s, it'd be great to get this pretty significant speed increase into our
tree.
The i686 patch is neat (30% faster!) but its improvement over gcc's emitted
assembly is small. Disabling the old i386 assembly seems a good first
step. Attached is a patch that disables the custom asm.
I'm
That reference is the network programming BIBLE!
Richard Stevens, "Unix Network Programming Volume 1"
Run, don't walk, to the nearest on-line bookstore and get the whole
series (Vols 1 and 2). You should also get "Advanced Programming in the
Unix Environment".
-A.
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Dale Chu
There's a good (albeit small) treatment of ptrace() in the Bach book (The
Design of the UNIX Operating System). If you need some examples, I can
send you some code you can look at.
-A.
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Vojislav Milunovic wrote:
>
> Does anyone have some sourcecodes or some papers for ptr
Hello,
I have FreeBSD 4-STABLE running a binary install of XFree86 4.0.2.
After installing xine from sources, I get a message saying I dont have
Thread-safe X libraries and it wont run. I've scoured google and many
newsgroups in search of anything on getting these "thread safe" libraries.
C
Hello,
I have FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE (soon to be -STABLE) running a binary
install of XFree86 4.0.2. After installing xine from sources, I get a
message saying I dont have Thread-safe X libraries and it wont run. I've
scoured google and many newsgroups in search of anything on getting
these "th
Have you tried remote gdb kernel debugging yet? It's documented in the
handbook also. I found it to be very easy to do and *much* better than
debugging on the same machine. All you need is a serial cable and a spare
FreeBSD machine. I used it to debug a module, but it would work just as
well on th
esn't have this capability, where would a good place to start
be on loopback NFS? maybe somebody has a loopback NFS skeleton i can start
from?
any pointers/discussion would be helpful.
aaron
here's one of the messages that made me say "yeah, like that!":
> Date:
ommitters pick this up?
> Another idea I have is to allow adduser to accept a hashed password
> instead of a plaintext one. Perhaps if this goes over well, Evan and I
> will work on that next.
i'd find this useful as well.
aaron
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I usually edit VIPW by hand. I have set up mail only accounts using
/usr/bin/passwd shell.
Along the same lines how do I go about setting up the following accounts:
ftp only
ftp and mail only
Thanks
Aaron
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Anybody have positive experience with this adapter?
I will be using it in a router box.
PRO/100+ DUAL PORT SERVER ADAPTER
Thank you,
Aaron
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Ok... my apologies to all those whose email clients are not capable of
parsing html emails... my settings indicated that my email was to be sent
plain text... this was apparently not the case as someone was kind enough to
point out...
thanks!
Aaron Sonntag
-Original Message-
From
… I was fairly detailed with the description of the problem…
thanks!
Aaron Sonntag
-Original
Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Aaron Sonntag
Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999
10:08 AM
To: zshack;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: slight problem
s and use it to compile
FreeBSD code and start banging on this stuff, but i have not had enough
free time to get going on it.
aaron
On Wed, Sep 01, 1999 at 07:14:10PM -0400, BSD Bob wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have been running FBSD for about 5 years, and am relatively comfortable
> with
people who stick with the bundled (superuser) sendmail.
aaron
On Wed, Sep 01, 1999 at 06:33:06PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I plan to add a user ``smtp'' with UID 25 and a member of group
> ``mail'', for use in running non-priveledged
s and use it to compile
FreeBSD code and start banging on this stuff, but i have not had enough
free time to get going on it.
aaron
On Wed, Sep 01, 1999 at 07:14:10PM -0400, BSD Bob wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have been running FBSD for about 5 years, and am relatively comfortable
> with
people who stick with the bundled (superuser) sendmail.
aaron
On Wed, Sep 01, 1999 at 06:33:06PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I plan to add a user ``smtp'' with UID 25 and a member of group
> ``mail'', for use in running non-priveledged
this seems undesirable to me, since using it immediately makes your shell
scripts nonportable. i liked the ls -t suggestion though.
--
Aaron Smith
aa...@mutex.org
On Thu, Aug 12, 1999 at 11:18:50AM +0200, Graham Wheeler wrote:
> thinking - wouldn't it be a good idea to add some new tests
this seems undesirable to me, since using it immediately makes your shell
scripts nonportable. i liked the ls -t suggestion though.
--
Aaron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 12, 1999 at 11:18:50AM +0200, Graham Wheeler wrote:
> thinking - wouldn't it be a good idea to add some new
#x27;t be starting out of inetd, they should be standalone and
preforked or threaded...
aaron
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
#x27;t be starting out of inetd, they should be standalone and
preforked or threaded...
aaron
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
anybody done any work on a utility for growing ufs filesystems?
aaron
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
anybody done any work on a utility for growing ufs filesystems?
aaron
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
disk, though (it will be cached for all cases in
which you care), and if you've got an early allow rule for the service, you
won't have to do any lookups. and like you say, if it's that sensitive, why
is it starting out of inetd?
all: sorry if i came off too strident. i have a sore spot for feeping
creaturism. :)
aaron
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
legitimate public argument for, to
>which I can't come up with a decent rebuttal.
i hope i've made a persuasive case that a *conf file format change* isn't
justified here. it doesn't make sense, especially if you are, as you have
mentioned, going to switch unwrapped to defaul
lue to
sharing the same inetd.conf format with lots of other platforms.
if people have their undies in a wad over this, can't they compile inetd
without LIBWRAP?
aaron
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
lue to
sharing the same inetd.conf format with lots of other platforms.
if people have their undies in a wad over this, can't they compile inetd
without LIBWRAP?
aaron
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
at least a couple of
months, so i'm hoping someone else wants to work on it too.
aaron
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
ult 80x24 window, set and exported TERM properly, etc?
i was not able to get my console to work properly past 38400 baud; i am not
sure why. 38400 has been just fine speed-wise for me, though, so i'm not
that upset. :)
(also see http://www.arctic.org/~aaron/tips/freebsd-serial-console)
aaron
umentation or the Makefile should be modified?
aaron
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
nd with that you can name each partition whatever you want, put them in any
>order, and optionally have a default partition to boot to.
LILO's an option too, right? Is no one mentioning it for some
incompatibility I don't know about (I haven't used it with FreeBSD), or is
the rea
tive. I'm still trying to
figure out the deal with "lockmgr".
--
Aaron Smith VERITAS Software
File System Engineer"I'll call him mini me".
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
58 matches
Mail list logo
