Re: New CAM locking preview

2013-08-15 Thread Alexander Motin
On 16.08.2013 04:12, Adrian Chadd wrote: Cool! I assume you've run this with full witness debugging enabled, to catch lock ordering issues? Of course! I've endless times switched between debug and normal builds to test both correctness and performance after each change. But more external tes

Re: will 9.2 be called 'diehard'? or maybe Naktomi?

2013-08-15 Thread Adrian Chadd
Oh look at that. It's so damned pretty. -adrian On 15 August 2013 18:16, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > Has a release ever been nicknamed before ? > > I don't recall any. > > -- > Jason Hellenthal > Inbox: jhellent...@dataix.net > Voice: +1 (616) 953-0176 > JJH48-ARIN > > > On Aug 15, 2013,

Re: will 9.2 be called 'diehard'? or maybe Naktomi?

2013-08-15 Thread Jason Hellenthal
Has a release ever been nicknamed before ? I don't recall any. -- Jason Hellenthal Inbox: jhellent...@dataix.net Voice: +1 (616) 953-0176 JJH48-ARIN On Aug 15, 2013, at 19:40, Darren Pilgrim wrote: >> http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/will-9-2-be-called-diehard-or-maybe-Naktomi-tp556

Re: New CAM locking preview

2013-08-15 Thread Adrian Chadd
Cool! I assume you've run this with full witness debugging enabled, to catch lock ordering issues? This is great. I look forward to per-CPU, pinned, completion threads that I can do interesting things with (like schedule aio-sendfile completions..) -adrian On 15 August 2013 14:40, Alexander

Re: New CAM locking preview

2013-08-15 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: "Hans Petter Selasky" To: "Alexander Motin" Cc: "Scott Long" ; "Jeff Roberson" ; "ken" ; ; "FreeBSD SCSI" ; "Steven Hartland" ; "Justin T. Gibbs" Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 1:38 AM Subject: Re: New CAM locking preview On 08/15/13 23:40, Alexander Mo

Re: New CAM locking preview

2013-08-15 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On 08/15/13 23:40, Alexander Motin wrote: Hi. Last weeks I've made substantial progress on my CAM locking work. In fact, at this moment I think I've tied all loose ends good enough to consider the new design viable and implementation worth further testing and bug fixing. So I would like to ask f

Re: will 9.2 be called 'diehard'? or maybe Naktomi?

2013-08-15 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
On Aug 15, 2013, at 3:38 PM, Jakub Lach wrote: > Well, that took me by surprise... That's probably the same thing 20th Century Fox's legal counsel said this morning. ;-) ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/l

Re: will 9.2 be called 'diehard'? or maybe Naktomi?

2013-08-15 Thread Darren Pilgrim
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/will-9-2-be-called-diehard-or-maybe-Naktomi-tp5562525p5836490.html Perhaps a creative type might do up McKusick's mascot a la Bruce Willis. Bonus points for weapon hosters made from Christmas gift wrap tape. ___

Re: will 9.2 be called 'diehard'? or maybe Naktomi?

2013-08-15 Thread Jakub Lach
Well, that took me by surprise... -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/will-9-2-be-called-diehard-or-maybe-Naktomi-tp5562525p5836490.html Sent from the freebsd-hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-ha

New CAM locking preview

2013-08-15 Thread Alexander Motin
Hi. Last weeks I've made substantial progress on my CAM locking work. In fact, at this moment I think I've tied all loose ends good enough to consider the new design viable and implementation worth further testing and bug fixing. So I would like to ask for review of my work from everybody who