Re: Kern.hz= +1 hertz at anything 2500 and above.

2013-07-25 Thread Super Bisquit
I haven't done much messing with scheduling. It is set at the default ULE for this machine. On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 25 July 2013 02:51, Wojciech Puchar > wrote: > >> improved with a higher kern.hz rating. Unless the future holds an > emu20k2, > >> there will

Re: Kern.hz= +1 hertz at anything 2500 and above.

2013-07-25 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 25 July 2013 02:51, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> improved with a higher kern.hz rating. Unless the future holds an emu20k2, >> there will be RAM used from the motherboard. >> 1. I will need a real-time or a faster kernel- hence the high rate wanted- >> because the devices to be built will be used

panic: kmem_map too small at heavy packet traffic

2013-07-25 Thread Tugrul Erdogan
howdy all, At my work, I am using 10.0-CURRENT on Intel(R) Xeon(R) E5620 with 16GB ram. I am taking "panic: kmem_malloc(-548663296): kmem_map too small: 539459584 total allocated" message with configuration below: [root@ ~]# sysctl vm.kmem_size_min vm.kmem_size_max vm.kmem_size vm.kmem_size_sca

Re: Kern.hz= +1 hertz at anything 2500 and above.

2013-07-25 Thread Wojciech Puchar
improved with a higher kern.hz rating. Unless the future holds an emu20k2, there will be RAM used from the motherboard. 1. I will need a real-time or a faster kernel- hence the high rate wanted- because the devices to be built will be used in an active environment: art, music, audio control. 2. An