warning: total configured swap (1178880 pages) exceeds maximum recommended
amount (1012480 pages).
warning: increase kern.maxswzone or reduce amount of swap.
I am yet to hear whether the warning is safe to ignore. Which one of the
following is true?
(1) Only 3955MiB of swap space will be use
... so run it inside hwpmc and see what the resulting CPU users are?
adrian
On 31 May 2013 07:01, Chris Rees wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think I've discovered a strange behaviour of sed perhaps triggered
> by the length of a regex passed to it. I noticed that a certain
> expression I passed took a
On 2 June 2013 18:15, Florent Peterschmitt wrote:
> Le 02/06/2013 14:16, Chris Rees a écrit :
>> On 2 June 2013 11:41, Eduardo Morras wrote:
>>> On Fri, 31 May 2013 15:01:59 +0100
>>> Chris Rees wrote:
>>>
Hi all,
I think I've discovered a strange behaviour of sed perhaps triggere
Le 02/06/2013 14:16, Chris Rees a écrit :
> On 2 June 2013 11:41, Eduardo Morras wrote:
>> On Fri, 31 May 2013 15:01:59 +0100
>> Chris Rees wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I think I've discovered a strange behaviour of sed perhaps triggered
>>> by the length of a regex passed to it. I noticed that
On 05/27/2013 19:59, d...@gmx.com wrote:
I have 4 hard drives, each containing a swap partition of size 1023MiB. I get:
warning: total configured swap (1178880 pages) exceeds maximum recommended
amount (1012480 pages).
warning: increase kern.maxswzone or reduce amount of swap.
I am yet to hea
On 2 June 2013 11:41, Eduardo Morras wrote:
> On Fri, 31 May 2013 15:01:59 +0100
> Chris Rees wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I think I've discovered a strange behaviour of sed perhaps triggered
>> by the length of a regex passed to it. I noticed that a certain
>> expression I passed took a very long
On Fri, 31 May 2013 15:01:59 +0100
Chris Rees wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think I've discovered a strange behaviour of sed perhaps triggered
> by the length of a regex passed to it. I noticed that a certain
> expression I passed took a very long time, and suspected the usual
> backtracking loop, so
Le 31/05/2013 16:01, Chris Rees a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I think I've discovered a strange behaviour of sed perhaps triggered
> by the length of a regex passed to it. I noticed that a certain
> expression I passed took a very long time, and suspected the usual
> backtracking loop, so I started tri
8 matches
Mail list logo