Re: Adding a FOREACH_CONTINUE() variant to queue(3)

2013-04-30 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 05/01/13 15:29, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <518092bf.9070...@freebsd.org>, Lawrence Stewart writes: >> [reposting from freebsd-arch@ - was probably the wrong list] > >> #define TAILQ_FOREACH_CONTINUE(var, head, field) \ > > Obligatory bikeshedding: > > I find the suffix

Re: config(8) -x headscratcher

2013-04-30 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:21:06AM +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Wojciech A. Koszek > wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 04:40:58AM +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Kimmo Paasiala > >> wrote: > >> > On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 11:

Re: Adding a FOREACH_CONTINUE() variant to queue(3)

2013-04-30 Thread Lawrence Stewart
Hi Alfred, On 05/01/13 14:10, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > On 4/30/13 8:57 PM, Lawrence Stewart wrote: >> [reposting from freebsd-arch@ - was probably the wrong list] >> >> Hi all, >> >> I've had use for these a few times now when wanting to restart a loop at >> a previously found element, and wonder

Re: Adding a FOREACH_CONTINUE() variant to queue(3)

2013-04-30 Thread Alfred Perlstein
On 4/30/13 8:57 PM, Lawrence Stewart wrote: [reposting from freebsd-arch@ - was probably the wrong list] Hi all, I've had use for these a few times now when wanting to restart a loop at a previously found element, and wonder if there are any thoughts about sticking them (and equivalents for oth

Adding a FOREACH_CONTINUE() variant to queue(3)

2013-04-30 Thread Lawrence Stewart
[reposting from freebsd-arch@ - was probably the wrong list] Hi all, I've had use for these a few times now when wanting to restart a loop at a previously found element, and wonder if there are any thoughts about sticking them (and equivalents for other list types) in ? Cheers, Lawrence #define

Re: SystemV IPC. Segment info

2013-04-30 Thread Vagner
On 16:44 Tue 30 Apr , Jilles Tjoelker wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 07:49:40AM +0400, Vagner wrote: > > Tell me please, may I send this to PR, or this changes is not valid? > > > > A few weeks ago, I ran into problem, which related to SystemV IPC. > > > More than 20 processes attached to a segm

Re: SystemV IPC. Segment info

2013-04-30 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 07:49:40AM +0400, Vagner wrote: > Tell me please, may I send this to PR, or this changes is not valid? > > A few weeks ago, I ran into problem, which related to SystemV IPC. > > More than 20 processes attached to a segment shared queue. > > Process-initiator for create segm