On 2 April 2013 20:07, Julian Elischer wrote:
> this sound somewhat like what I did back in the 90s with BSD4.3
> unfortunately it was not done with TCP (or sctp of course)
>
> what we did was to create a special shared memeory device driver.
> Then we added ioctls to the disk driver layer to wri
On 2/8/13 4:22 AM, gary mazzaferro wrote:
Hi,
I was told to post this question here (Ken Merry), it would be a good
place to get some help. I'm not sure this is doable without a kernel
module, which I don't want to add.
I'll explain what I'm attempting..
I'm designing a high speed rest motor f
Thanks John,
That is helpful.
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:33 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, March 22, 2013 4:10:16 pm vasanth rao naik sabavat wrote:
> > Hi Adrian,
> >
> > Just to clarify, is the kernel pre-emption involuntary?
> >
> > Let say I have a kernel thread processing a huge list of
As far I can tell it's now April 2nd in all time zones.
Can we now end this thread?
thank you,
-Alfred
On 4/2/13 6:22 AM, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 10:22:20AM +, Ruben de Groot wrote:
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 03:10:56AM -0700, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk typed:
On Tue, Ap
On 2/8/13 4:22 AM, gary mazzaferro wrote:
Hi,
I was told to post this question here (Ken Merry), it would be a good
place to get some help. I'm not sure this is doable without a kernel
module, which I don't want to add.
I'll explain what I'm attempting..
I'm designing a high speed rest motor f
>Not sure if the right answer is for drivers not to call ether_ifattach()
>until the point-of-no-failure (lots of drivers are wrong then) or
>initialize other parts earlier.
The other "obvious" method is to rearrange the sysinit priorities
(/sys/sys/kernel.h) so that all network domains are initia
>Can you provide a backtrace that leads to this?
Sure. In case it's not obvious, the __rw_rlock at the top of the
trace is working on a lock that has never been initialized (the
first of the two ipv4 PCBs).
Chris
Booting...
GDB: no debug ports present
KDB: debugger backends: ddb
KDB: current ba
Goodness gracious, did no one see the date on the original post?
What's the limit on this fishing hole?
--
Chris BeHanna
ch...@behanna.org
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ha
On Apr 2, 2013, at 10:27 AM, Chris BeHanna wrote:
> Goodness gracious, did no one see the date on the original post?
>
> What's the limit on this fishing hole?
Three internet Trolls, two wise old owls and a april fool in a pear tree from
the looks of it.
Warner
__
Hi,
- Original Message -
> From: "Gleb Smirnoff"
> To: "Chris Torek"
> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
> Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2013 3:57:08 AM
> Subject: Re: boot time crash in if_detach_internal()
>
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 03:45:19AM -0600, Chris Torek wrote:
> C> I have been poki
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 10:22:20AM +, Ruben de Groot wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 03:10:56AM -0700, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk typed:
> > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
> >
> > > Wojciech Puchar writes:
> > > > Lev Serebryakov writes:
> > > > > It is not exact so
On Apr 2, 2013, at 4:10 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>
>> Wojciech Puchar writes:
>>> Lev Serebryakov writes:
It is not exact so. Some Atoms on some motherboards with some
firmwares are 64-bit CPU.
>>> don't know of an
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Mehmet Erol Sanliturk writes:
> > I am NOT able to understand the merit of these products with respect
> > to their features and PRICES.
>
> Please stop SHOUTING, and learn to accept and respect the fact that
> other people have other
Mehmet Erol Sanliturk writes:
> I am NOT able to understand the merit of these products with respect
> to their features and PRICES.
Please stop SHOUTING, and learn to accept and respect the fact that
other people have other opinions and priorities than you do, and to stop
trying to force your wo
Hi all,
On behalf of monthly@, I would like to inform you that the next
submission date for the January to March quarterly status reports is
April 21st, 2013 - less than a month away.
They don't have to be very long - anything that lets people know what
is going on inside FreeBSD is useful. Note
Am 02.04.2013 12:13, schrieb Kimmo Paasiala:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Wojciech Puchar writes:
Lev Serebryakov writes:
It is not exact so. Some Atoms on some motherboards with some
firmwares are
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 03:10:56AM -0700, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk typed:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
>
> > Wojciech Puchar writes:
> > > Lev Serebryakov writes:
> > > > It is not exact so. Some Atoms on some motherboards with some
> > > > firmwares are 64-bit CPU
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Achim Hut wrote:
> Am 02.04.2013 12:13, schrieb Kimmo Paasiala:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>>>
Wojciech Puchar writes:
>
> Lev Serebryakov w
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>
>> Wojciech Puchar writes:
>> > Lev Serebryakov writes:
>> > > It is not exact so. Some Atoms on some motherboards with some
>> > > firmwares are 64-bit CPU.
>> > don't kn
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Wojciech Puchar writes:
> > Lev Serebryakov writes:
> > > It is not exact so. Some Atoms on some motherboards with some
> > > firmwares are 64-bit CPU.
> > don't know of any now in shops that are not
>
> http://soekris.com/products/ne
Hello, Dag-Erling.
You wrote 2 апреля 2013 г., 13:04:04:
DES> http://soekris.com/products/net6501.html
This one is 64-bit capable according to their mailing list
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http:
Wojciech Puchar writes:
> Lev Serebryakov writes:
> > It is not exact so. Some Atoms on some motherboards with some
> > firmwares are 64-bit CPU.
> don't know of any now in shops that are not
http://soekris.com/products/net5501.html
http://soekris.com/products/net6501.html
DES
--
Dag-Erling Sm
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 03:45:19AM -0600, Chris Torek wrote:
C> I have been poking about with the bhyve virtualization code in
C> FreeBSD 10-current, and managed to crash FreeBSD during its
C> bootstrap process due to the fact that if_detach is called
C> from boot time configuration code, before th
On 01/04/13 20:31, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Why stop there?
>
> Noone runs FreeBSD on real hardware anymore. Except, say netflix.
>
> Let's just drop actual native hardware support and instead support
> only the bare minimum needed to boot inside vmware, virtualbox and
> xen.
>
> Anyone needing rea
24 matches
Mail list logo