So, this is not a valid warning in our universe and I'd like to silence
it when compiling sys/boot as printf(9) and sprintf(9) supports this
format. How can we silence this warning for the FreeBSD universe?
===> efi/libefi (all)
In file included from efinet.c:39:
/home/sbruno/fbsd_head/sys/boot/e
... why aren't you using atomics? or read/write barriers?
Adrian
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 05:58:30PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 09:41:38PM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
> > I'd like feedback on the attached patch, which adds support to our
> > time_pps_fetch() implementation for the blocking behaviors described in
> > section 3.4.3 of
On 02/09/2013 12:51 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 8 February 2013 16:31, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 19:32 -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
Does someone here mind reviewing
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=174226 for correctness.
Please feel free to post alternate diffs as a reply
on 09/02/2013 01:51 Eitan Adler said the following:
> On 8 February 2013 16:31, Ian Lepore wrote:
>> On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 19:32 -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
>>> Does someone here mind reviewing
>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=174226 for correctness.
>>>
>>> Please feel free to post al
5 matches
Mail list logo