Re: IBM blade server abysmal disk write performances

2013-01-19 Thread Don Lewis
On 19 Jan, Stefan Esser wrote: > I seem to remember, that drives of that time required the write cache > to be enabled to get any speed-up from tagged commands. This was no > risk with SCSI drives, since the cache did not make the drives lye > about command completion (i.e. the status for the wri

Re: IBM blade server abysmal disk write performances

2013-01-19 Thread Don Lewis
On 18 Jan, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > If computer have UPS then write caching is fine. even if FreeBSD crash, > disk would write data I've had my share of sudden UPS failures over the years. Probably more than half have been during an automatic battery self test. UPS goes on battery, and then *b

Re: IBM blade server abysmal disk write performances

2013-01-19 Thread Scott Long
On Jan 19, 2013, at 4:33 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> to be enabled to get any speed-up from tagged commands. This was no >> risk with SCSI drives, since the cache did not make the drives lye > > i see no correlation between interface type and possibility of lying about > command completion.

Re: IBM blade server abysmal disk write performances

2013-01-19 Thread Wojciech Puchar
to be enabled to get any speed-up from tagged commands. This was no risk with SCSI drives, since the cache did not make the drives lye i see no correlation between interface type and possibility of lying about command completion. ___ freebsd-hackers

Re: IBM blade server abysmal disk write performances

2013-01-19 Thread Dieter BSD
Stefan writes: > I seem to remember, that drives of that time required the write cache > to be enabled to get any speed-up from tagged commands. This was no > risk with SCSI drives, since the cache did not make the drives lye > about command completion (i.e. the status for the write was only > retu

Re: IBM blade server abysmal disk write performances

2013-01-19 Thread Wojciech Puchar
I remember those drives from some 20 years ago. Before that time, SCSI and IDE drives were independently developed and SCSI drives offered way yes. 20 years ago it was true. even in 1995, when i had SCSI controller in my 486 and it was great compared to ATA. today SATA and SAS are mostly the

Re: IBM blade server abysmal disk write performances

2013-01-19 Thread Stefan Esser
Am 19.01.2013 00:32, schrieb Karim Fodil-Lemelin: > * Although no one has reported problems with the 2 gig > * version of the DCAS drive, the assumption is that it > * has the same problems as the 4 gig version. Therefore > * this

libprocstat(3): retrieve process command line args and environment

2013-01-19 Thread Mikolaj Golub
Hi, Some time ago Stanislav Sedov suggested to me extending libprocstat(3) with functions to retrieve process command line arguments and environment variables. In the first approach I tried, the newly added functions procstat_getargv/getenvv allocated a buffer of necessary size, stored the values

Re: IBM blade server abysmal disk write performances

2013-01-19 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Turning the write cache off eliminates the risk of having the write cache on. this sentence sounds like "not having a car eliminates a risks of driving". ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hac