Re: Another WTF moment

2012-12-16 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message <1355691233.1198.126.ca...@revolution.hippie.lan>, Ian Lepore wrote: >On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 12:01 -0800, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >> So, um, WTF? One ST380011A is 156299375 sectors big, and the other one >> is 156301488 big. >> >> How exactly does this happen? > >Assuming the 3.0

Re: Another WTF moment

2012-12-16 Thread Achim Patzner
Am 16.12.2012 um 21:01 schrieb "Ronald F. Guilmette" : > ada0: ATA-6 device > ada1: ATA-6 device You might consider taking a closer look at the firmware versions… Achim ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/l

Re: NetBSD's boot select MBR

2012-12-16 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message <20121215175447.310...@gmx.com>, "Dieter BSD" wrote: >...Some sysadmins want >the MBR to be read-only for various reasons. Apparently, at least one sizeable company headquartered in Redmond, Washington does too. Can't imagine why. :-) http://www.zdnet.com/linux-foundation-uefi-s

Re: Another WTF moment

2012-12-16 Thread Ian Lepore
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 12:01 -0800, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > I have two Seagate ST380011A drives, both in the same single system. > > On that system, I boot to the FreeBSD 9.1-RC3 LiveCD. > > The resulting dmesg messages indicate the following regarding the two drives: > > ada0 at ata0 bus

Re: Another WTF moment

2012-12-16 Thread claudiu vasadi
Hi, Maybe manufacturing problem? Can you try the disks on another system and see if the problem persists? -- Best regards, Claudiu Vasadi ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscr

Another WTF moment

2012-12-16 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
I have two Seagate ST380011A drives, both in the same single system. On that system, I boot to the FreeBSD 9.1-RC3 LiveCD. The resulting dmesg messages indicate the following regarding the two drives: ada0 at ata0 bus 0 scbus2 target 0 lun 0 ada0: ATA-6 device ada0: 100.000MB/s transfers (UDM

Re: Fix overlinking in base aka import pkgconf

2012-12-16 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 04:03:40PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 02:01:00PM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > > I think this could be solved by an implicit linker script contained in > > .so and .a files, pointing to the real libraries. > > We have already the SHLIB_LDSC

Re: Fix overlinking in base aka import pkgconf

2012-12-16 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 02:01:00PM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > Hi bapt, kib, > > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:56:43AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 03:22:34AM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:54:19AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:

Re: Fix overlinking in base aka import pkgconf

2012-12-16 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
Hi bapt, kib, On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:56:43AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 03:22:34AM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:54:19AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Some of our binary are overlinked, the way we hand