On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 4 December 2012 21:23, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Reference:
>>> From: Eitan Adler
>>> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 20:58:20 -0500
>>> Message-id:
>>>
>>
>> Eitan Adler wrote:
>>> On 4 December 2012 20:21, Julian H. Stac
On 4 December 2012 21:23, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Hi,
> Reference:
>> From: Eitan Adler
>> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 20:58:20 -0500
>> Message-id:
>>
>
> Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On 4 December 2012 20:21, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>> > At Wed Dec 5 02:16:29 CET 2012 the web ref fai
Hi,
Reference:
> From: Eitan Adler
> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 20:58:20 -0500
> Message-id:
>
Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 4 December 2012 20:21, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > At Wed Dec 5 02:16:29 CET 2012 the web ref fails:
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=17
On 4 December 2012 20:21, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> At Wed Dec 5 02:16:29 CET 2012 the web ref fails:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=174108
> There is no bug in the bin category beyond 174103
This is a known issue. I'm not sure what is causing it.
Your bug made it (check t
> There is a missing double quote " in
> 8.3 & 9.0 & 9.1RC2 src/etc/sendmail/freebsd.mc
> 8.2-RELEASE & earlier are OK.
> I will send-pr unless I hear otherwise.
I sent a patch, & received this
Message-id: <201212041520.qb4fk0pn030...@freefall.freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 03:28:37PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For my NFSv4.1 client work, I've taken a few definitions out of a
> kernel rpc .c file and put them in a .h file so that they can
> be included in other sys/rpc .c files.
>
> I've currently named the file _krpc.h. I thought I
Hi,
For my NFSv4.1 client work, I've taken a few definitions out of a
kernel rpc .c file and put them in a .h file so that they can
be included in other sys/rpc .c files.
I've currently named the file _krpc.h. I thought I'd check if
this is a reasonable name before doing the "big commit" of the
N
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:52 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> Hmm, I certainly see the module directories being built in parallel. Some
> of
> the make jobs may not be as obvious since links are silent (no output
> unless
> there is an error).
>
>
This is definitely not the behaviour that I see trying
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 11:06:56AM +0100, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
> Hello hackers,
>
> The following PR patches crunchide(1) to accept object files produced by the
> gold and mclinker linkers:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin%2F174011
>
> On behalf of the submitter, I'd like to
On Sunday, November 04, 2012 2:53:02 pm Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 22.10.2012 15:28, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Sunday, October 21, 2012 7:11:10 am Andre Oppermann wrote:
> >> What's keeping kernel modules from building in parallel with
> >> "make -j8"?
> >
> > They don't for you? They do for me
On Dec 4, 2012, at 1:24 AM, Myles C. Maxfield wrote:
> Hello, all,
> I'm interested in learning about the internals of how libc works, so I was
> hoping to link a test application with a version of libc that has debugging
> symbols (reading the raw sources only gets me so far). The version of lib
Hello hackers,
The following PR patches crunchide(1) to accept object files produced by the
gold and mclinker linkers:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin%2F174011
On behalf of the submitter, I'd like to request a review of the patch, and
testing of crunchide/crunchgen especially on
12 matches
Mail list logo
