Re: please review: patch to retain device name for dumpdev.

2012-11-01 Thread Alfred Perlstein
On 11/1/12 1:06 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message <50921b44.20...@ixsystems.com>, Alfred Perlstein writes: Poul-Henning, what do you think? Is there a nicer way? Perhaps a way to include the "/dev/$device" I think there are private implemenations where dumpdev is a network thi

Re: please review: patch to retain device name for dumpdev.

2012-11-01 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <50921b44.20...@ixsystems.com>, Alfred Perlstein writes: >Poul-Henning, what do you think? Is there a nicer way? Perhaps a way >to include the "/dev/$device" I think there are private implemenations where dumpdev is a network thing, so too much magic string editing is proba

please review: patch to retain device name for dumpdev.

2012-11-01 Thread Alfred Perlstein
I've always wanted to be able to query the current dump device. This patch lets me do this. Poul-Henning, what do you think? Is there a nicer way? Perhaps a way to include the "/dev/$device" as the patch in its current form only stores "ada0p3". I think that is OK. Provide a device name i

Re: make -jN buildworld on < 512MB ram

2012-11-01 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Peter Jeremy wrote: On 2012-Oct-31 12:58:18 -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: It seems like the new compiler likes to get up to ~200+MB resident when building some basic things in our tree. The killer I found was the ctfmerge(1) on the kernel - which exceeds ~400MB on i386.

Re: Threaded 6.4 code compiled under 9.0 uses a lot more memory?..

2012-11-01 Thread Ian Lepore
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 10:12 +0800, David Xu wrote: > On 2012/10/31 22:44, Karl Pielorz wrote: > > > > > > --On 31 October 2012 16:06 +0200 Konstantin Belousov > > wrote: > > > >> Since you neglected to provide the verbatim output of procstat, nothing > >> conclusive can be said. Obviously, you can