On 06/15/2012 11:37, rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
>*** The following files exist in /etc/rc.d but not in
>/var/tmp/temproot/etc/rc.d/:
>
> sshd
man src.conf, and search for SSH. You have one of those options defined
in your environment.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for y
The suggestions are all good, but they require volunteers to volunteer
more of their time (for free, hence "volunteering") to maintain longer
branches; it requires more resources from volunteer mirrors (for free,
hence "volunteer") to store even more ports and CD-ROM ISO snapshots.
What we as a co
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 9 will mature as people use it and report bugs/regressions. It would
> be really great if you could try some of your workload on -9 and
> provide feedback and file PRs.
>
> Engaging with the community (and hiring developers :) is by f
I've been working on EFI support for intel platforms. I've managed to
build the EFI Development Kit (EDK II) and the IASL compiler for
FreeBSD, which raises the possibility of integrating them either as
ports, or possibly into the base system.
Here is some background:
Right now, there is only on
On 2012-06-15 07:14, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
15.06.2012 19:09, Varuna пишет:
About 2***, so what are the conditions to be true to figure out that
/etc/resolv.conf has not changed?
There is simple solution: create file /etc/dhclient-enter-hooks
and override add_new_resolv_conf() there to do not
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Atte Peltomäki wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 02:09:38PM -0400, Richard Yao wrote:
>> Also, I am certain that the OpenRC developers would be thrilled if
>> FreeBSD adopted OpenRC. If FreeBSD core is interested in OpenRC, feel
>> free to contact the OpenRC and/or
So what , this fell on deaf ears or was it a horridly bad idea ?
Anyone care to share ?
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Mark Saad wrote:
> All
> I have an partial solution to this issue I was thinking about this on
> my morning train ride, so its a bit bumpy.
>
> Here are my solutions they are
I'm runing FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p3
Sys is upgraded and all files in sync, but just for fun:
Without any args:
# mergemaster
---
*** Creating the temporary root environment in /var/tmp/temproot
*** /var/tmp/temproot ready for use
*** Creating and populating director
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 23:02 +0530, Varuna wrote:
> Thanks for the pointers.
>
> Dima Panov wrote:
> > From my /etc/dhclient.conf:
> >
> > interface "lagg0" {
> > send dhcp-lease-time 3600;
> > prepend domain-name-servers 127.0.0.1, 4.4.4.4, 8.8.8.8;
> > request subnet-mask, broadcast
Thanks for the pointers.
Dima Panov wrote:
From my /etc/dhclient.conf:
interface "lagg0" {
send dhcp-lease-time 3600;
prepend domain-name-servers 127.0.0.1, 4.4.4.4, 8.8.8.8;
request subnet-mask, broadcast-address, time-offset, routers,
domain-name, domain-name-servers;
15.06.2012 19:09, Varuna пишет:
> About 2***, so what are the conditions to be true to figure out that
> /etc/resolv.conf has not changed?
There is simple solution: create file /etc/dhclient-enter-hooks
and override add_new_resolv_conf() there to do nothing:
add_new_resolv_conf() {
return 0
}
On Jun 15, 2012, at 5:47 AM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> Varuna wrote:
>> Hello Folks,
>>
>> Noticed a strange issue with the creation / update of /etc/resolv.conf.
>> The details of the system that I noticed the issue on is:
>> Version : FreeBSD 8.0
>> Patch level: not patched
>> Uname: FreeB
15.06.2012 23:09, Varuna написал:
Hello Folks,
Noticed a strange issue with the creation / update of
/etc/resolv.conf. The details of the system that I noticed the issue
on is:
Version : FreeBSD 8.0
Patch level: not patched
Uname: FreeBSD shastry.eudaemonicsystems.net 8.0-RELEASE FreeB
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 02:09:38PM -0400, Richard Yao wrote:
> Also, I am certain that the OpenRC developers would be thrilled if
> FreeBSD adopted OpenRC. If FreeBSD core is interested in OpenRC, feel
> free to contact the OpenRC and/or the Gentoo FreeBSD developers. We
> would all love to see Ope
On 6/15/12 10:52 AM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:16:30AM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>> I'm thinking we might jump straight from 8.x to 10 when the time comes,
>> I'm really looking forward to Gleb's work on CARP and PF ;)
>
> I don't know why you might think one .0 release
Varuna wrote:
Hello Folks,
Noticed a strange issue with the creation / update of /etc/resolv.conf.
The details of the system that I noticed the issue on is:
Version : FreeBSD 8.0
Patch level: not patched
Uname: FreeBSD shastry.eudaemonicsystems.net 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD
8.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Sep 29
Hello Folks,
Noticed a strange issue with the creation / update of /etc/resolv.conf. The
details of the system that I noticed the issue on is:
Version : FreeBSD 8.0
Patch level: not patched
Uname: FreeBSD shastry.eudaemonicsystems.net 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE
#0: Thu Sep 29 22:37
On Jun 15, 2012 9:39 AM, "Peter Jeremy" wrote:
>
> On 2012-Jun-14 08:09:30 +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
> >Except STABLE is no good for production, and the problem is EoL- updates
> >and support stop.
>
> There's nothing stopping you from from running -stable in production.
> Obviously, you will need
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:16:30AM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> I'm thinking we might jump straight from 8.x to 10 when the time comes,
> I'm really looking forward to Gleb's work on CARP and PF ;)
I don't know why you might think one .0 release would be more mature
than another .0 release. Ma
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> 10.x will likely be more stable if 9.x gets stressed, and the bugs
> from there get fixed in -HEAD.
>
> I know this goes against what users expect, but as a software
> developer, QA is only as good as your testing and validation
> procedures.
On 2012-Jun-14 08:09:30 +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
>Except STABLE is no good for production, and the problem is EoL- updates
>and support stop.
There's nothing stopping you from from running -stable in production.
Obviously, you will need to do more extensive testing than you might
need to for a -r
10.x will likely be more stable if 9.x gets stressed, and the bugs
from there get fixed in -HEAD.
I know this goes against what users expect, but as a software
developer, QA is only as good as your testing and validation
procedures. :)
Adrian
___
free
On 6/15/12 4:25 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 9 will mature as people use it and report bugs/regressions. It would
> be really great if you could try some of your workload on -9 and
> provide feedback and file PRs.
>
> Engaging with the community (and hiring developers :) is by far the
> be
On 2012-Jun-13 21:55:22 +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>Try setting:
>
>sysctl hw.usb.no_boot_wait=1
Note that this is a tunable and will need to be specified in /boot/loader.conf
to have any effect.
--
Peter Jeremy
pgpojiOBCDYfk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
24 matches
Mail list logo
