On 4/30/12 3:49 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
On 04/11/2012 01:07, Andrey Zonov wrote:
On 10.04.2012 20:19, Alan Cox wrote:
On 04/09/2012 10:26, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, April 05, 2012 11:54:31 am Alan Cox wrote:
On 04/04/2012 02:17, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 11:02:53P
--- On Tue, 5/22/12, Ian Lepore wrote:
> Seeing your example config with the commented-out HostKey
> lines made me
> realize that you probably want to have two HostKey lines,
> one for the
> protocol v1 key and another for the dsa key for v2.
> The 6.x server
> added the v1 key and the v2 dsa
On 22. May 2012, at 21:14 , Alex wrote:
> Hi there. I am running FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p1 #18 r235095 amd64 and am
> experiencing a reproducible page fault when using IPsec with "device
> aesni" enabled. Strongswan successfully negotiates the SAs and uses
> aes256 for ESP, however once a packet is
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 09:59 -0700, Jason Usher wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> Thank you very much for taking a look at this, and for understanding what I'm
> talking about here.
>
> Comments inline, below...
>
>
> --- On Tue, 5/22/12, Ian Lepore wrote:
>
> > >
> > > >But have you tried it in thi
Hi Ian,
Thank you very much for taking a look at this, and for understanding what I'm
talking about here.
Comments inline, below...
--- On Tue, 5/22/12, Ian Lepore wrote:
> >
> > > But have you tried it in this order
> ?
> > >
> > > HostKey
> /usr/local/etc/ssh/ssh_host_key
> > >
What is wrong with this procedure?
The filesystem partitions end up at locations that aren't even multiples of
4K. This can reduce performance. How much probably depends on the SSD.
well in my case it is a multiply of any number you like
[root@wojtek ~]# bsdlabel ada0
# /dev/ada0:
8 partiti
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 14:26 -0700, Jason Usher wrote:
>
> --- On Mon, 5/21/12, Garance A Drosehn wrote:
>
> >But have you tried it in this order ?
> >
> >HostKey /usr/local/etc/ssh/ssh_host_key
> >HostKey
> > /usr/local/etc/ssh/ssh_host_dsa_key
> >HostKey
> > /usr/local/etc/ssh
On Tue, 22 May 2012, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Tuesday, May 22, 2012 a las 07:42:18AM -0600, Warren Block escribió:
On Tue, 22 May 2012, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Sunday, May 20, 2012 a las 03:36:01AM +0900, rozhuk...@gmail.com
escribió:
Do not use MBR (or manually do all to align).
El día Tuesday, May 22, 2012 a las 07:42:18AM -0600, Warren Block escribió:
> On Tue, 22 May 2012, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> > El día Sunday, May 20, 2012 a las 03:36:01AM +0900, rozhuk...@gmail.com
> > escribió:
> >>
> >> Do not use MBR (or manually do all to align).
> >> 63 - not 4k aligned.
>
On Tue, 22 May 2012, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Sunday, May 20, 2012 a las 03:36:01AM +0900, rozhuk...@gmail.com
escribió:
Do not use MBR (or manually do all to align).
63 - not 4k aligned.
To create the above shown partition layout I have not used gpart(8); I
just said:
# fdisk -I /d
On Tue, 22 May 2012 07:56:42 +0200
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 May 2012 01:35:48 Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 May 2012 11:01:34 -0500
> >
> > Mark Tinguely wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Svatopluk Kraus
> > >
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16.05.2012 21:06, Will Froning wrote:
> Hello Jakub,
>
> I've never used it, but have you looked at authpf(8)? A quick look at the man
> pages suggest you can have different NAT entries per-user.
>
> Thanks,
> Will
>
> --
> Will Froning
> Unix
Hello Community.
My name is Alexander Pronin. I am a GSOC student at The FreeBSD Project.
My project is "Parallelization in the ports collection and pkgng utility"
I have created wiki page where I described problems that I have to solve and
approaches to solving this problems.
(
http://wiki.free
13 matches
Mail list logo
