I prefer "less advanced" FreeBSD
Ridiculing other projects is not a great way to show superiority.
+1
Leave mudslinging to marketing and politicians :)..
-Garrett
as for now you and few other people work hard to DE-promote FreeBSD from
those few people that are able to make use of it but
>
> Another way to promote FreeBSD - show Solaris first. Yesterday just to look
downloaded from oracle. Incredibly slow, no idea
what's going on not only while installing but when trying to do anything and
understand /etc/ hierarchy. incredible slow mess - this
is "the most advanced unix" from O
Mac OSD _is_ a UNIX: http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4376
So, why not use a UNIX on the Desktop? :)
as well as my VoIP phone gateway software. as well as Mac software it is
unix based but NOT meant for it's user to interact with unix commands or
even know it is.
Just opposite to FreeBSD/amd64.
the server is required to do that. (ie. Make sure the data is stored on
stable storage, so it can't be lost if the server crashes/reboots.)
Expensive NFS servers can use non-volatile RAM to speed this up, but a generic
FreeBSD box can't do that.
Some clients (I believe ESXi is one of these) reque
On 04/11/2012 01:07, Andrey Zonov wrote:
On 10.04.2012 20:19, Alan Cox wrote:
On 04/09/2012 10:26, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, April 05, 2012 11:54:31 am Alan Cox wrote:
On 04/04/2012 02:17, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 11:02:53PM +0400, Andrey Zonov wrote:
Hi,
I
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> is there any way to speed up NFS server?
>
> from what i noticed:
>
> - reads works fast and good, like accessed locally, readahead up to
> maxbsize works fine on large files etc.
>
> - write works terribly. it performs sync on every write IMHO,
> setting vfs.nfsrv.async
On Apr 29, 2012, at 8:47 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 29 Apr 2012 16:33, "Wojciech Puchar"
> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> FreeBSD installation and boot style are very nice . Personally I dislike
> very much Ubuntu-like installs ( nothing is displayed about
>>> what is going on ) and I never use it ( in sp
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 12:25:22 -0400
Richard Yao wrote:
> Dear Everyone,
>
> I tried compiling zfsloader from the FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE tree on
> Gentoo Linux, but I encountered issues due to missing symbols:
>
> /var/tmp/portage/sys-boot/gptzfsloader-9.0/work/sys/boot/i386/zfsloader/../libi386/lib
Dear Everyone,
I tried compiling zfsloader from the FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE tree on Gentoo
Linux, but I encountered issues due to missing symbols:
/var/tmp/portage/sys-boot/gptzfsloader-9.0/work/sys/boot/i386/zfsloader/../libi386/libi386.a(elf32_freebsd.o):(.data+0x0):
undefined reference to `elf32_o
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:06:08PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 23/04/2012 00:21 Marius Strobl said the following:
> > On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 06:37:54PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> [snip]
> >> I am particularly interested in reviews of my attempt to make ZFS boot
> >> support
> >> arch-indepe
On 29 Apr 2012 16:33, "Wojciech Puchar"
wrote:
>>
>>
>> FreeBSD installation and boot style are very nice . Personally I dislike
very much Ubuntu-like installs ( nothing is displayed about
>> what is going on ) and I never use it ( in spite of I am installing each
release of it ) .
>
>
> Another w
there are lots of services that could benefit from FreeBSD who are
not very aware of it. They may have heard the name, and even know
that it is an OS, but have heard it passed off as a non-entity in
the field and do not know better than that.
Don't really understand you.
Basically everything t
FreeBSD installation and boot style are very nice . Personally I dislike very
much Ubuntu-like installs ( nothing is displayed about
what is going on ) and I never use it ( in spite of I am installing each
release of it ) .
Another way to promote FreeBSD - show Solaris first. Yesterday just t
There is such a very nice distribution :
http://ghostbsd.org/
Also, freesbie.org
That's great - there are "distributions" with ready to use "desktop"
environments etc. etc. while the main one is always the same. Everyone
gets what he/she needs.
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 07:39:25AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >
> > My opinion is that most important obstacle in front of FreeBSD is its
> > installation structure :
> >
> >
> > It is NOT possible to install and use a FreeBSD distribution directly as it
> > is .
> >
> > In Linux distrib
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 09:08:18PM -0400, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:24 PM, wrote:
>
> > Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:06 PM, wrote:
> > > > I'm wondering if spinning up a "live DVD" desktop version, using
> > > > GENERIC, and/or Gno
16 matches
Mail list logo
