Absolutely I do NOT have any idea against PC-BSD . My wish is that it
Me too. in spite that it is FreeBSD based, it's good it is separate. This
means that people that want windows style computing already have something
FreeBSD based.
So what a problem?
__
My opinion is that most important obstacle in front of FreeBSD is its
installation structure :
It is NOT possible to install and use a FreeBSD distribution directly as it is .
In Linux distributions , when a distribution is installed , the user , NOT root
,
can use its facilities WITHOUT set
and are working not toying around - use FreeBSD.
Not really true and kind of a poor attitude.
possibly but this is what i observe.
Yes. many people needing high performance already use FreeBSD, but
there are lots of services that could benefit from FreeBSD who are
not very aware of it. They
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:06 PM, wrote:
> Greetings...
>
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:18:47 -0400
> Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Jerry McAllister
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 08:27:07PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > >
> > > > >After using L
Greetings...
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:18:47 -0400
Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Jerry McAllister
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 08:27:07PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >
> > > >After using Linux for almost 15 years, I only recently started
> > > >usin
I have now updated the shar and patch to uart(4) code from head
(instead of 9.0), fixed read() not respecting O_NONBLOCK, and improved
behaviour at kldunload:
http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/uart-lirc-preliminary-002.patch
and
http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/uartlirc-prelim
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Steven Hartland wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Mehmet Erol Sanliturk"
> >
> > > My opinion is that most important obstacle in front of FreeBSD is
> > > its
> > > installation structure :
> > >
> > >
> > > It is NOT possibl
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Steven Hartland wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Mehmet Erol Sanliturk"
>
> My opinion is that most important obstacle in front of FreeBSD is its
>> installation structure :
>>
>>
>> It is NOT possible to install and use a FreeBSD distribution directly
Steven Hartland wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mehmet Erol Sanliturk"
>
> > My opinion is that most important obstacle in front of FreeBSD is
> > its
> > installation structure :
> >
> >
> > It is NOT possible to install and use a FreeBSD distribution
> > directly as it
> > is .
>
- Original Message -
From: "Mehmet Erol Sanliturk"
My opinion is that most important obstacle in front of FreeBSD is its
installation structure :
It is NOT possible to install and use a FreeBSD distribution directly as it
is .
I disagree, we find quite the opposite; FreeBSD's curren
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
wrote:
> My opinion is that most important obstacle in front of FreeBSD is its
> installation structure :
>
> It is NOT possible to install and use a FreeBSD distribution directly as it
> is .
>
> In Linux distributions , when a distribution i
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 05:18:47PM -0400, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Jerry McAllister wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 08:27:07PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >
> > > >After using Linux for almost 15 years, I only recently started using
> > > >FreeBSD.
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 08:27:07PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>
> > >After using Linux for almost 15 years, I only recently started using
> > >FreeBSD. I own an internet startup and was looking for a solution for
> >
> > Those who need
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 08:27:07PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >After using Linux for almost 15 years, I only recently started using
> >FreeBSD. I own an internet startup and was looking for a solution for
>
> Those who need FreeBSD already use it. no need to promote. Or maybe need
> to prom
is there any way to speed up NFS server?
from what i noticed:
- reads works fast and good, like accessed locally, readahead up to
maxbsize works fine on large files etc.
- write works terribly. it performs sync on every write IMHO,
setting vfs.nfsrv.async=1 improves things SLIGHTLY, but still
After using Linux for almost 15 years, I only recently started using
FreeBSD. I own an internet startup and was looking for a solution for
Those who need FreeBSD already use it. no need to promote. Or maybe need
to promote bigger donations to FreeBSD community from big users.
Those who actual
Andy Young wrote:
> After using Linux for almost 15 years, I only recently started using
> FreeBSD. I own an internet startup and was looking for a solution for
> implementing large-scale storage servers. In my research I found ZFS and
> subsequently found FreeBSD. As I learned more about it, I wa
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:16:51AM -0400, Andy Young wrote:
> After using Linux for almost 15 years, I only recently started using
> FreeBSD. I own an internet startup and was looking for a solution for
> implementing large-scale storage servers. In my research I found ZFS and
> subsequently foun
After using Linux for almost 15 years, I only recently started using
FreeBSD. I own an internet startup and was looking for a solution for
implementing large-scale storage servers. In my research I found ZFS and
subsequently found FreeBSD. As I learned more about it, I was incredibly
impressed. The
on 27/04/2012 13:37 Andrey V. Elsukov said the following:
> What you think about this concept:
> We can implement some MI API to query disks count and each disk parameters
> (mediasize,
> sectorsize). This MI code will use some IOCTL that will act with MD "disk"'s
> devsw->ioctl.
>
> devicename.
On Friday, April 27, 2012 3:56:06 am Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in syncache_socket() in tcp_syncache.c the global variable thread0 is used to
> do a in6_pcbconnect() with the ucread of thread0. Why is the thread0 used
> here
> and not the one of the current thread?
The current thread is
On 27.04.2012 13:14, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> I also have some WIP related to moving partition table handling into MD
Oh, i did mean MI part.
>> part. You can look here: http://people.freebsd.org/~ae/sys_boot.diff
>
> I like this patch. OTOH, I couldn't help by wonder if it is possible to
> someh
on 23/04/2012 09:23 Andrey V. Elsukov said the following:
> On 23.04.2012 1:21, Marius Strobl wrote:
>> I can't say much about these patches as a whole as they are rather big
>> and I'm not aware of all the details of ZFS. However, one bit that makes
>> the current implementation x86-specific is zf
on 23/04/2012 00:21 Marius Strobl said the following:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 06:37:54PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
[snip]
>> I am particularly interested in reviews of my attempt to make ZFS boot
>> support
>> arch-independent. The arches, of course, would have to add some code to make
>> use
Hi,
in syncache_socket() in tcp_syncache.c the global variable thread0 is used to
do a in6_pcbconnect() with the ucread of thread0. Why is the thread0 used here
and not the one of the current thread?
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Obere Lagerstr. 30, D-82178 Puchheim, Ge
25 matches
Mail list logo
