Hi.
On 03/03/12 05:24, Adrian Chadd wrote:
mav@, can you please take a look at George's traces and see if there's
anything obviously silly going on?
He's reporting that your ULE work hasn't improved his (very) degenerate case.
As I can see, my patch has nothing to do with the problem. My patch
Hi,
CC'ing mav@, who started this thread.
mav@, can you please take a look at George's traces and see if there's
anything obviously silly going on?
He's reporting that your ULE work hasn't improved his (very) degenerate case.
Thanks!
Adrian
On 2 March 2012 16:14, George Mitchell wrote:
> On
ports/sysutils/pstack can do this if you use x86 machine.
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Yuri wrote:
> I have the multithreaded process, each thread has some stack state at each
> point of time. For example during the timer tick when processes are
> switched?
> Is there a way to take a snapshot
Gdb. Thread apply all bt.
Thanks,
Max
On Mar 2, 2012, at 4:49 PM, Yuri wrote:
> I have the multithreaded process, each thread has some stack state at each
> point of time. For example during the timer tick when processes are switched?
> Is there a way to take a snapshot without disrupting a
On 03/03/2012, at 11:19, Yuri wrote:
> I have the multithreaded process, each thread has some stack state at each
> point of time. For example during the timer tick when processes are switched?
> Is there a way to take a snapshot without disrupting a process?
>
> I was thinking gdb, but it requi
I have the multithreaded process, each thread has some stack state at
each point of time. For example during the timer tick when processes are
switched?
Is there a way to take a snapshot without disrupting a process?
I was thinking gdb, but it requires the process to exit the system call
to at
On 03/02/12 18:06, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi George,
Have you thought about providing schedgraph traces with your
particular workload?
I'm sure that'll help out the scheduler hackers quite a bit.
THanks,
Adrian
I posted a couple back in December but I haven't created any more
recently:
http
Hi George,
Have you thought about providing schedgraph traces with your
particular workload?
I'm sure that'll help out the scheduler hackers quite a bit.
THanks,
Adrian
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
Sean Bruno writes:
| I'm noting that newer machines are completely hosed if we attempt to
| probe for bios values. I'm proposing this change.
|
| -bash-4.2$ p4 diff -du //depot/yahoo/ybsd_7/src/sys/i386/i386/bios.c
| --- //depot/yahoo/ybsd_7/src/sys/i386/i386/bios.c 2011-09-16
| 22:47:30.00
On Friday, March 02, 2012 2:58:16 pm rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: John Baldwin
> To: rank1see...@gmail.com
> Cc: hack...@freebsd.org, "Roman Divacky" , "Andriy
> Gapon"
> Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:46:59 -0500
> Subject: Re: BUG: 9.0 stage 2 boot (/boot/boot)
Hi,
I add some customized encryption algorithm to openssl when i want to
compile
my openssl package it send me this error.i send this error to openssl
developer
mailing list but they didn't any answer and i send to your's group and
i hope to
help me.
...
shlib_target=; if [ -n "" ]; then shlib
On behalf of the 6th USENIX/ACM Workshop on Networked Systems for
Developing Regions (NSDR '12) program committee, we invite you to submit
papers that propose and discuss ideas concerning the design,
implementation, and evaluation of new computing and communications
technologies to support the sust
I'm noting that newer machines are completely hosed if we attempt to
probe for bios values. I'm proposing this change.
-bash-4.2$ p4 diff -du //depot/yahoo/ybsd_7/src/sys/i386/i386/bios.c
--- //depot/yahoo/ybsd_7/src/sys/i386/i386/bios.c 2011-09-16
22:47:30.0
+++ /home/seanbru/
- Original Message -
From: John Baldwin
To: rank1see...@gmail.com
Cc: hack...@freebsd.org, "Roman Divacky" , "Andriy Gapon"
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:46:59 -0500
Subject: Re: BUG: 9.0 stage 2 boot (/boot/boot)
> On Friday, March 02, 2012 1:46:37 pm rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
> > -
On Friday, March 02, 2012 1:46:37 pm rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: John Baldwin
> To: rank1see...@gmail.com
> Cc: hack...@freebsd.org, "Roman Divacky" , "Andriy
> Gapon"
> Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:24:24 -0500
> Subject: Re: BUG: 9.0 stage 2 boot (/boot/boot)
- Original Message -
From: John Baldwin
To: rank1see...@gmail.com
Cc: hack...@freebsd.org, "Roman Divacky" , "Andriy Gapon"
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:24:24 -0500
Subject: Re: BUG: 9.0 stage 2 boot (/boot/boot)
> On Friday, March 02, 2012 10:17:03 am rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
> > -
On 03/02/2012 08:52, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, March 01, 2012 5:23:11 pm Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 3/1/2012 1:14 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>>> My firefox on my BSD desktop was caching the image.
>>
>> Holding down Shift when clicking reload usually handles this.
>
> Only if you already kno
On Friday, March 02, 2012 10:17:03 am rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: John Baldwin
> To: rank1see...@gmail.com
> Cc: hack...@freebsd.org, "Roman Divacky" , Andriy Gapon
>
> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 16:14:43 -0500
> Subject: Re: BUG: 9.0 stage 2 boot (/boot/boot)
On Thursday, March 01, 2012 5:23:11 pm Doug Barton wrote:
> On 3/1/2012 1:14 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > My firefox on my BSD desktop was caching the image.
>
> Holding down Shift when clicking reload usually handles this.
Only if you already know that FF is incorrectly caching the image. :(
-
- Original Message -
From: Eygene Ryabinkin
To: Garrett Cooper
Cc: Chris Rees , rank1see...@gmail.com, hack...@freebsd.org,
f...@freebsd.org
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 10:24:59 +0400
Subject: Re: src builds and STDERR
> Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:38:06AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > On Thu,
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 10:33:33AM +, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Fri Mar 2 12, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 11:38:22PM +, Alexander Best wrote:
> > > hi there,
> > >
> > > i just noticed that du will not accepts something like the following:
> > >
> > >
- Original Message -
From: John Baldwin
To: rank1see...@gmail.com
Cc: hack...@freebsd.org, "Roman Divacky" , Andriy Gapon
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 16:14:43 -0500
Subject: Re: BUG: 9.0 stage 2 boot (/boot/boot)
> > However, avg@ might have found the actual cause of the bug. And Roman did
Quoting Shrikanth Kamath (from Sun, 26 Feb
2012 13:24:19 +0530):
...meaning, I see the following line in "sys/conf/kmod.mk", but that
is a CTFMERGE command.
.if defined(MK_CTF) && ${MK_CTF} != "no"
${CTFMERGE} ${CTFFLAGS} -o ${.TARGET} ${OBJS}
.endif
Where do we run the CTFCONVERT on ke
On (01/03/2012 23:38), Alexander Best wrote:
> hi there,
>
> i just noticed that du will not accepts something like the following:
>
> du -t-500M
>
> whereas
>
> du -t500M
>
> will work. i've attached a patch, which makes unit suffixes in connection with
> negative thresholds possible.
Good c
On Fri Mar 2 12, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 11:38:22PM +, Alexander Best wrote:
> > hi there,
> >
> > i just noticed that du will not accepts something like the following:
> >
> > du -t-500M
> >
> > whereas
> >
> > du -t500M
> >
> > will work. i've attached a
--On 01 March 2012 07:59 -0800 Garrett Cooper wrote:
Do you mean (looking at the man page) just setting:
hint.kbdmux.0.disabled="1"
In device.hints?
That didn't make any difference - nor, (just in case) did setting it to
'0'.
Are you sure it's compiled into the kernel? It's in GENERIC,
26 matches
Mail list logo
