Re: Moving on ... (was: Re: FreeBSD has serious problems with...)

2012-02-08 Thread mdf
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:33 PM, John Kozubik wrote: > If it were up to me, I think I would stake out a very loud and clear mission > statement for FreeBSD that explicitly sacrifices new features for longer > lifecycles and deeper investment in particular releases.  I've thought > seriously about

Moving on ... (was: Re: FreeBSD has serious problems with...)

2012-02-08 Thread John Kozubik
Hello, On Thu, 26 Jan 2012, Da Rock wrote: I normally hate to dredge up old threads, but this is like getting halfway through a story and not finding out the ending... :) What is the answer? Is there a solution to this? When I wrote the original post, I was expecting at most a benign resp

Re: Kerberos and FreeBSD

2012-02-08 Thread Rick Macklem
Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, Ansar Mohammed wrote: > > > Hello All, > > Is the port of Heimdal on FreeBSD being maintained? The version that > > ships with 9.0 seems a bit old. > > > > #> /usr/libexec/kdc-v > > kdc (Heimdal 1.1.0) > > Copyright 1995-2008 Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan

Re: backup BIOS settings

2012-02-08 Thread Andrey Zonov
On 10.01.2012 7:01, Łukasz Kurek wrote: Hi, Is it possible to backup BIOS settings (CMOS configuration) to file and restore this settings on the other machine (the same hardware configuration and the same BIOS)? I try do it for this way: kldload nvram dd if=/dev/nvram of=nvram.bin (backup)

Re: Kerberos and FreeBSD

2012-02-08 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, Ansar Mohammed wrote: Hello All, Is the port of Heimdal on FreeBSD being maintained? The version that ships with 9.0 seems a bit old. #> /usr/libexec/kdc-v kdc (Heimdal 1.1.0) Copyright 1995-2008 Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan Send bug-reports to heimdal-b...@h5l.org My under

Kerberos and FreeBSD

2012-02-08 Thread Ansar Mohammed
Hello All, Is the port of Heimdal on FreeBSD being maintained? The version that ships with 9.0 seems a bit old. #> /usr/libexec/kdc-v kdc (Heimdal 1.1.0) Copyright 1995-2008 Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan Send bug-reports to heimdal-b...@h5l.org ___ freebsd

Re: [PATCH] multiple instances of ipfw(4)

2012-02-08 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 03:04:09PM +0100, Ermal Lu?i wrote: E> 2012/2/8 Gleb Smirnoff : E> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:02:04PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote: E> > L> if i understand what the patch does, i think it makes sense to be E> > L> able to hook ipfw instances to specific interfaces/sets of inte

Re: [PATCH] multiple instances of ipfw(4)

2012-02-08 Thread Ermal Luçi
2012/2/8 Gleb Smirnoff : > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:02:04PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > L> if i understand what the patch does, i think it makes sense to be > L> able to hook ipfw instances to specific interfaces/sets of interfaces, > L> as it permits the writing of more readable rulesets. Right

Re: [PATCH] multiple instances of ipfw(4)

2012-02-08 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:02:04PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote: L> if i understand what the patch does, i think it makes sense to be L> able to hook ipfw instances to specific interfaces/sets of interfaces, L> as it permits the writing of more readable rulesets. Right now the L> workaround is start th

Re: [RFT][patch] Scheduling for HTT and not only

2012-02-08 Thread Ivan Voras
On 06/02/2012 20:10, Alexander Best wrote: btw: does anybody know, if there are plans to commit the BFS scheduler to HEAD BFS is available but I think it needs more work on it before it can be useful; it didn't explore some optimizations it could have and currently spends much more time in l