On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:52:44PM +, Mark Blackman wrote:
> I suspect poor old RE is putting too much work into BETAs and RCs for
> point releases.
The counter-argument is that we have a lot more leeway to make mistakes
on a .0 release. We're not going to be cut any slack at all for shippin
Mark Blackman wrote:
> On 26 Jan 2012, at 14:37, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, January 19, 2012 4:33:40 pm Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >> On 19 January 2012 09:47, Mark Saad wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> What could I do to help make 7.5-RELEASE a reality ?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Put your hand up and volun
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:23:43PM +, Mark Blackman wrote:
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/releng/release-proc.html
>
> "New releases of FreeBSD are released from the -STABLE branch at
> approximately four month intervals."
That was our intention at one point. Obviously
On 26 Jan 2012, at 22:49, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:23:43PM +, Mark Blackman wrote:
>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/releng/release-proc.html
>>
>> "New releases of FreeBSD are released from the -STABLE branch at
>> approximately four month interva
On 26 Jan 2012, at 18:22, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:49:22 am Mark Blackman wrote:
>> a) who is "the project" in this case
>> and
>> b) what does it take for a release to be a release?
>
> I'll answer the two together. The project is the entity that "owns"
> freebsd.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Artem Belevich wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 6:54 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>>> > 3. The code in bcache.c doesn't really implement an LRU - it implements
>>> > 'least recently added' algorithm, i.e. a kind of queue. Not that
>>> > it matters much, since it
On Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:49:22 am Mark Blackman wrote:
>
> On 26 Jan 2012, at 14:37, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, January 19, 2012 4:33:40 pm Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >> On 19 January 2012 09:47, Mark Saad wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> What could I do to help make 7.5-RELEASE a reali
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 6:54 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>> > 3. The code in bcache.c doesn't really implement an LRU - it implements
>> > 'least recently added' algorithm, i.e. a kind of queue. Not that
>> > it matters much, since it flushes the elements two seconds after
>> > caching them any
On 26 Jan 2012, at 14:37, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, January 19, 2012 4:33:40 pm Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> On 19 January 2012 09:47, Mark Saad wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> What could I do to help make 7.5-RELEASE a reality ?
>>>
>>
>> Put your hand up and volunteer to run the 7.5-RELEASE release
On Tuesday, January 24, 2012 1:22:57 pm Artem Belevich wrote:
> 2012/1/23 Edward Tomasz Napierała :
> > Some time ago I've spent some time on trying to speed up loading
> > modules by the loader(8). Result can be found at:
> >
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~trasz/fast-loader-3.diff
> >
> > This pa
On Thursday, January 19, 2012 4:33:40 pm Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 19 January 2012 09:47, Mark Saad wrote:
>
> > I just want to chime in here, what is the deal with killing off a
> > potential 7.5-RELEASE ? Having a few 7.3-RELEASE and 7.4-RELEASE
> > servers I would like to see a 7.5-RELEASE th
On 01/20/12 09:13, John Kozubik wrote:
I normally hate to dredge up old threads, but this is like getting
halfway through a story and not finding out the ending... :)
What is the answer? Is there a solution to this?
I have a string of questions on this:
1. Incidentally, what exactly does co
12 matches
Mail list logo
