Re: Porting PathScale's EKOPath Compiler Suite

2011-09-09 Thread Jung-uk Kim
people.freebsd.org/~jkim/ekopath-devel.tar.bz2 > > I just uploaded a new tarball, ekopath-devel-20110909.bz2. The real path is http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/ekopath-devel-20110909.tar.bz2 Sorry for the typo. Jung-uk Kim ___ freebsd

Re: Porting PathScale's EKOPath Compiler Suite

2011-09-09 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Thursday 08 September 2011 06:11 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > I have done preliminary porting work of PathScale's open-sourced > EKOPath Compiler Suite (https://github.com/pathscale). > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/ekopath-devel.tar.bz2 I just uploaded a new tarball, ekopa

Re: excessive use of gettimeofday(2) and other syscalls

2011-09-09 Thread Alexander Best
On Fri Sep 9 11, Alexander Best wrote: > On Fri Sep 9 11, Dieter BSD wrote: > > >> Firefox 5 and 6 has more gettimeofday call than 2 per second on my > > >> amd64-8.2-stable box. > > > > > i don't see why chromium needs > > > to call gettimeofday(2) or any library function that triggers it m

Re: excessive use of gettimeofday(2) and other syscalls

2011-09-09 Thread Alexander Best
On Fri Sep 9 11, Dieter BSD wrote: > >> Firefox 5 and 6 has more gettimeofday call than 2 per second on my > >> amd64-8.2-stable box. > > > i don't see why chromium needs > > to call gettimeofday(2) or any library function that triggers it more > > than 3000 times a second. > > What the are

Re: Porting PathScale's EKOPath Compiler Suite

2011-09-09 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Friday 09 September 2011 12:49 pm, "C. Bergström" wrote: > On 09/ 9/11 10:53 PM, arrowdodger wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:11 AM, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > >> I have done preliminary porting work of PathScale's open-sourced > >> EKOPath Compiler Suite (https://github.com/pathscale). > >> >

Re: Porting PathScale's EKOPath Compiler Suite

2011-09-09 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Friday 09 September 2011 11:53 am, arrowdodger wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:11 AM, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > I have done preliminary porting work of PathScale's open-sourced > > EKOPath Compiler Suite (https://github.com/pathscale). > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/ekopath-devel.tar.b

Re: Porting PathScale's EKOPath Compiler Suite

2011-09-09 Thread C. Bergström
On 09/ 9/11 10:53 PM, arrowdodger wrote: On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:11 AM, Jung-uk Kim wrote: I have done preliminary porting work of PathScale's open-sourced EKOPath Compiler Suite (https://github.com/pathscale). http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/ekopath-devel.tar.bz2 This includes experimenta

Re: excessive use of gettimeofday(2) and other syscalls

2011-09-09 Thread Dieter BSD
>> Firefox 5 and 6 has more gettimeofday call than 2 per second on my >> amd64-8.2-stable box. > i don't see why chromium needs > to call gettimeofday(2) or any library function that triggers it more > than 3000 times a second. What the are web browsers doing that they "need" the clock so of

Re: Porting PathScale's EKOPath Compiler Suite

2011-09-09 Thread arrowdodger
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:11 AM, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > I have done preliminary porting work of PathScale's open-sourced > EKOPath Compiler Suite (https://github.com/pathscale). > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/ekopath-devel.tar.bz2 > > This includes experimental OpenMP support and PathDB. Unfor

Re: excessive use of gettimeofday(2) and other syscalls

2011-09-09 Thread Alexander Best
On Fri Sep 9 11, Paul Ambrose wrote: > what version of chromium are you using? > I use chromium-13.0.782.215 on amd64 8.2-stable, the gettimeofday call is > far less than 2 per second, about 20 per second, but I notice old > version has this bug, but latest version has fixed it. Maybe you shou

Re: excessive use of gettimeofday(2) and other syscalls

2011-09-09 Thread Paul Ambrose
what version of chromium are you using? I use chromium-13.0.782.215 on amd64 8.2-stable, the gettimeofday call is far less than 2 per second, about 20 per second, but I notice old version has this bug, but latest version has fixed it. Maybe you should update your chromium and try again. Firefo

Re: Soliciting opinions on an extension of the bootinfo structure

2011-09-09 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday, September 08, 2011 6:48:19 pm Peter Wemm wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Peter Grehan wrote: > >> I'm proposing an extension framework for the bootinfo structure used > >> to pass information from the bootstrap/loader to the kernel. Although > >> I'm only proposing this for t

Re: Soliciting opinions on an extension of the bootinfo structure

2011-09-09 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday, September 08, 2011 6:25:23 pm Peter Grehan wrote: > > I'm proposing an extension framework for the bootinfo structure used > > to pass information from the bootstrap/loader to the kernel. Although > > I'm only proposing this for the MIPS bootinfo, it's completely > > applicable to any

RE: Soliciting opinions on an extension of the bootinfo structure

2011-09-09 Thread Andrew Duane
That's correct. This is actually part of a larger effort to open up the MIPS code to a range of new bootstraps. Some bootstraps use the bootinfo facility extensively. It's an easy way to pass some simple information to the kernel without the clutter of metadata and other such things.  .

Re: excessive use of gettimeofday(2) and other syscalls

2011-09-09 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2011-Sep-07 12:41:54 -0600, Manish Vachharajani wrote: >This is great info, thanks. Is it worth having some kind of >environment variable tunable (or even compile time tunable) to have a >"fast" gettimeofday then? Maybe. rwatson@ produced a preloadable .so to do this - see http://www.watson

Re: Porting PathScale's EKOPath Compiler Suite

2011-09-09 Thread Bernhard Froehlich
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 18:11:45 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > I have done preliminary porting work of PathScale's open-sourced > EKOPath Compiler Suite (https://github.com/pathscale). > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/ekopath-devel.tar.bz2 > > This includes experimental OpenMP support and PathDB. U