On 09/02/2011 17:51, Jarrod Lee Petz wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> The problem itself is currently seen on AIX yes.
So you're much more likely to get help on an AIX list.
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experien
Hi Doug,
The problem itself is currently seen on AIX yes.
However, I am more after.
1. Insight into the TCP/IP stack. Is it broken here?
2. Insight into whether active FTP is flawed in design? Or perhaps just
this implementation of it? Solution is to use passive FTP which seems fine.
3. Would
On 09/02/2011 07:07, Jarrod Lee Petz wrote:
> We have an AIX system
It's not clear to me what the FreeBSD related problem is here.
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Charlie Martin wrote:
Sorry, I mean *our* build, and having just made it work by running our build
and making sure which modules I was getting, I'm pretty confident.
On 2011-09-02 14:48, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Charlie Martin wrote:
All righ
Sorry, I mean *our* build, and having just made it work by running our
build and making sure which modules I was getting, I'm pretty confident.
On 2011-09-02 14:48, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Charlie Martin wrote:
All right, now it works. There's some flaw in the b
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Charlie Martin wrote:
> All right, now it works. There's some flaw in the build which causes the
> FreeBSD 8 to get the modules built for FreeBSD 7.
That assumption seems questionable. Do you have more details you
can provide (i.e. where each source tree is lo
All right, now it works. There's some flaw in the build which causes
the FreeBSD 8 to get the modules built for FreeBSD 7.
Thanks all.
On 2011-09-02 13:57, Charlie Martin wrote:
On 2011-09-02 13:35, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 02/09/2011 19:55 Charlie Martin said the following:
Yeah, and the sa
On 2011-09-02 13:35, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 02/09/2011 19:55 Charlie Martin said the following:
Yeah, and the same overall Makefile is successfully building in dtrace on the
other part of the product, which is actually using FreeBSD 7-something. I'm
sure there's some tiny difference, but it w
on 02/09/2011 19:55 Charlie Martin said the following:
> Yeah, and the same overall Makefile is successfully building in dtrace on the
> other part of the product, which is actually using FreeBSD 7-something. I'm
> sure there's some tiny difference, but it would sure help to have some idea of
> wh
Yeah, and the same overall Makefile is successfully building in dtrace
on the other part of the product, which is actually using FreeBSD
7-something. I'm sure there's some tiny difference, but it would sure
help to have some idea of what those dmesg messages are telling me.
It's not that the
Hi,
Just saw that PCEngines has a new board, with SIM socket, but to get
it working, it needs a mimi pci express modem, and
from http://www.pcengines.ch/alix6e1.htm
'On Alix, only USB 2.0 connectivity is supported' ...
does this means the modem appears as a usb device?
cheers,
d
Hi All,
This is a repost (to mailing list) of my forum post here.
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=26075
All links to RFCs can be found in that forum post. Please excuse my lack
of mailing list decorum or ASCII formatting (I am new here).
In my day to day work I have just run into a p
12 matches
Mail list logo
