sys/boot/boot0/boot0.S - r186598

2011-01-08 Thread Tom Judge
Hi, Today I ran into an issue where setting the default slice with boot0cfg -s is broken. This is related to a section of this revision: + commit Warner's patch "orb $NOUPDATE,_FLAGS(%bp)" to avoid writing to disk in case of a timeout/default choice; This issue is quite well documented in bin

Re: NFS Performance

2011-01-08 Thread Mark Saad
Rick Do you have more details on the issue is it 8.x only ? Can you point us to the stable thread abourt this ? On 1/8/11, Doug Barton wrote: > On 01/08/2011 10:19, george+free...@m5p.com wrote: >> No, I did not report the problems then.-- George > > Well we're glad yo

Re: NFS Performance

2011-01-08 Thread Doug Barton
On 01/08/2011 10:19, george+free...@m5p.com wrote: No, I did not report the problems then.-- George Well we're glad you're reporting them now. :) Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth

Re: broken INCLUDE in sys/conf/kern.pre.mk for opensolaris code?

2011-01-08 Thread Alexander Best
On Thu Jan 6 11, Warner Losh wrote: > On 01/06/2011 06:45, Alexander Best wrote: > >On Thu Jan 6 11, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: > >>On 6 January 2011 04:40, Alexander Best wrote: > >>>hi there, > >>> > >>>while building target buildkernel with 'clang -v' i noticed a lot of > >>>these > >>>lines: >

Re: NFS Performance

2011-01-08 Thread Rick Macklem
> George > I remember reading there was some sort of nfs issues in 8.1-RELEASE, > a regression of some sort it was noted early on in the release. Have > you tried this with 8.2-RC1 also what are your nfs client mount > options ? > > On 1/8/11, george+free...@m5p.com wrote: > > Among four machines

Re: MONITOR/MWAIT question

2011-01-08 Thread Matthew Dillon
:On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 02:24:34PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: :> Does anyone know if an IRET cancels/triggers a MONITOR event? : :AMD's Architecture Programmer's Manual explicitly contains: : :Events that cause an exit from the monitor event pending state include: :... :- Any far control tr

Re: NFS Performance

2011-01-08 Thread george+freebsd
> FYI, -stable is probably the better list for this. > > On 01/08/2011 09:54, george+free...@m5p.com wrote: > >> George > >>I remember reading there was some sort of nfs issues in 8.1-RELEASE, > >> a regression of some sort it was noted early on in the release. Have > >> you tried this with 8.

Re: NFS Performance

2011-01-08 Thread Doug Barton
FYI, -stable is probably the better list for this. On 01/08/2011 09:54, george+free...@m5p.com wrote: George I remember reading there was some sort of nfs issues in 8.1-RELEASE, a regression of some sort it was noted early on in the release. Have you tried this with 8.2-RC1 also what are you

Re: NFS Performance

2011-01-08 Thread george+freebsd
> George > I remember reading there was some sort of nfs issues in 8.1-RELEASE, > a regression of some sort it was noted early on in the release. Have > you tried this with 8.2-RC1 also what are your nfs client mount > options ? > I'll update to 8.2-RC1 later today and see if anything changes,

Re: NFS Performance

2011-01-08 Thread Mark Saad
George I remember reading there was some sort of nfs issues in 8.1-RELEASE, a regression of some sort it was noted early on in the release. Have you tried this with 8.2-RC1 also what are your nfs client mount options ? On 1/8/11, george+free...@m5p.com wrote: > Among four machines on my networ

NFS Performance

2011-01-08 Thread george+freebsd
Among four machines on my network, I'm observing startling differences in NFS performance. All machines are AMD64, and rpc_statd, rpc_lockd, and amd are enabled on all four machines. wonderland: hw.model: AMD Athlon(tm) II Dual-Core M32 hw.physmem: 293510758 ethernet: 100Mb/s partition 1: FreeBSD