Hi,
In svn r133636, there was a commit to convert the linear search in
vm_map_findspace() to use the vm_map splay tree. Just curious, were
there any discussions about that particular change? Any measurements
other than the ones noted in the commit log? Any notes on why that
design was used rather
On 12/15/10 4:33 AM, Dr. Baud wrote:
Is there a cap on the amount of memory a driver (via bus_dmamem_alloc) can
allocate, other than the obvious physical memory limit minus the memory already
allocated?
well it has to fit into the kernel virtual space too.
this is quite limited on x86 thou
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 06:56:58AM -0800, Jakub Lach wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=129236621626462&w=2
>
> What's your insight?
>
Someone has figured out how to get free code audit.
Lots of paranoid people started to look at the code.
Ingvar
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 06:56:58AM -0800, Jakub Lach wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=129236621626462&w=2
>
> What's your insight?
>
Someone has figured out how to get free code audit.
Lots of paranoid people started to look at the code.
Ingvar
___
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 06:56:58 -0800 (PST)
Jakub Lach wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=129236621626462&w=2
>
> What's your insight?
There's already a thread on this on the security list.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing
[redirected from -hackers to -security]
Jakub Lach writes:
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=129236621626462&w=2
http://maycontaintracesofbolts.blogspot.com/2010/12/openbsd-ipsec-backdoor-allegations.html
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
_
Is there a cap on the amount of memory a driver (via bus_dmamem_alloc) can
allocate, other than the obvious physical memory limit minus the memory already
allocated?
Dr.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fre
John Nielsen wrote:
> On Dec 15, 2010, at 7:12 AM, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
> >
> >> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:38:23 +0100
> >> From: Emanuel Haupt
> >> To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
> >> Subject: LED support for ALIX 2/3 series
> >> Is anyon
On Dec 15, 2010, at 7:12 AM, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
>
>> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:38:23 +0100
>> From: Emanuel Haupt
>> To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
>> Subject: LED support for ALIX 2/3 series
>> Is anyone interested in porting leds-alix.c [1]
Hello.
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=129236621626462&w=2
What's your insight?
regards,
- Jakub Lach
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/IPSEC-allegations-tp30464535p30464535.html
Sent from the freebsd-hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:38:23 +0100
From: Emanuel Haupt
To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: LED support for ALIX 2/3 series
Is anyone interested in porting leds-alix.c [1] for the ALIX 2/3 series [2]?
The following version uses linux API's.
I'd
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 12:38:23 Emanuel Haupt wrote:
> Is anyone interested in porting leds-alix.c [1] for the ALIX 2/3 series
> [2]? The following version uses linux API's.
>
> I'd gladly write a port for it if someone could port it.
>
> Emanuel
>
> [1] http://people.freebsd.org/~ehaupt/
Is anyone interested in porting leds-alix.c [1] for the ALIX 2/3 series [2]?
The following version uses linux API's.
I'd gladly write a port for it if someone could port it.
Emanuel
[1] http://people.freebsd.org/~ehaupt/misc/leds-alix-0.0.1/leds-alix.c
[2] http://www.pcengines.ch/
__
13 matches
Mail list logo