On Friday, October 29, 2010 8:12:06 pm Oleksandr Tymoshenko wrote:
> I ran into problems trying to get hwpmc to work on 64-bit MIPS
> system with big endian byte order. Turned out hwpmc syscall handler
> is byte-order and register_t size agnostic unlike the rest of syscalls.
> The best solutio
Hi Cronfy,
On Saturday 30 October 2010 23:48:45 cronfy wrote:
> Hello.
>
> > Every time backup starts server slows down significantly, disk
> > operations become very slow. It may take up to 10 seconds to stat() a
> > file that is not in filesystem cache. At the same time, rsync on
> > remote serv
Might gsched(8) help ?
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi,
I'd like to introduce shlib-compat -- an ABI compatibility checker for
shared libraries with symbol versioning. The idea of such tool was
discussed on mail lists before.
shlib-compat uses debugging info (dwarf) from compiled library to
compare definitions of exported symbols, i.e. no sources
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Jonathan McKeown wrote:
> On Sunday 31 October 2010 22:44:25 Matthew Dillon wrote:
>> :> and the output produced by dump is not live-accessible whereas a
>> :> snapshot / live filesystem copy is. That makes the dump fairly
>> :> worthless for anything other than c
On Sunday 31 October 2010 22:44:25 Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :> and the output produced by dump is not live-accessible whereas a
> :> snapshot / live filesystem copy is. That makes the dump fairly
> :> worthless for anything other than catastrophic recovery.
> :
> :Ever heard of "restore -i"?
>
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
