On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Wed Sep 15 10, Oliver Fromme wrote:
>> Warren Block wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > 8. Alexander Motin has an updated CAM version of the ATA system which
>> > will eventually replace the existing one. In -CURRENT, anyway. He was
>> > kind e
Forwarding for a colleague,
Patrick
Original Message
Subject: Crash dump on HP Proliant G6 broken as of V8.0
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:53:16 -0700
From: Paul Heyman
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
CC: Patrick Mahan
References:
<32ab5c9615cc494997d9abb1db12783c024c8c5...@sj-
hi there,
after discovering PR #114082 i noticed that with CPUTYPE not being defined in
make.conf, `make -VCFLAGS` reports a trailing whitespace for CFLAGS.
the reason for this is that ${_CPUCFLAGS} gets added to CFLAGS even if it's
empty.
the following patch should take care of the problem. i al
On Wed Sep 15 10, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Warren Block wrote:
> > [...]
> > 8. Alexander Motin has an updated CAM version of the ATA system which
> > will eventually replace the existing one. In -CURRENT, anyway. He was
> > kind enough to look at my event handler. My understanding is that
All,
I am trying to debug a system hang occurring on my HP Proliant G6 running some
of our
kernel software. I am seeing that under certain test loads, the system will
hang-up
complete, no keyboard, no console, etc. I suspect it is some of the kernel
code that
I have inherited that contains a
Warren Block wrote:
> [...]
> 8. Alexander Motin has an updated CAM version of the ATA system which
> will eventually replace the existing one. In -CURRENT, anyway. He was
> kind enough to look at my event handler. My understanding is that he is
> looking at implementing the head parkin
(that's this book:
http://amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0321635361/modecdesi-20
Author's homepage:
http://erdani.com/
) ...and finally played with the language a bit. I've posted
some notes about getting dmd 2.048 running on FreeBSD (that's the
D 2.0 compiler + runtime + phobos l
On Wednesday, September 15, 2010 11:46:00 am Matthew Fleming wrote:
> I'll take a stab at answering these...
>
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Andrey Simonenko
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have questions about mutex implementation in kern/kern_mutex.c
> > and sys/mutex.h files (current versio
On Monday, September 13, 2010 4:57:15 pm cronfy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Trying to overtake high server load (sudden peaks of 15%us/85%sy, LA >
> 40, very slow lstat() at these moments, looks like some kind of lock
> contention) I enabled vfs.lookup_shared=1 on two servers today. One is
> FreeBSD-7.3 k
ALL,
The crash dump worked fine in V7.3.
I am debugging crash dump problem on a HP Proliant G6
which uses a SATA drive connected to a CISS Raid Controller.
I have tried this on a x86 box using a non-raid ATA/SATA disk controller
and it works well.
I noticed that in V8.0 there is a new SCSI oper
I'll take a stab at answering these...
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Andrey Simonenko
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have questions about mutex implementation in kern/kern_mutex.c
> and sys/mutex.h files (current versions of these files):
>
> 1. Is the following statement correct for a volatile pointer
Hello,
I have questions about mutex implementation in kern/kern_mutex.c
and sys/mutex.h files (current versions of these files):
1. Is the following statement correct for a volatile pointer or integer
variable: if a volatile variable is updated by the compare-and-set
instruction (e.g. atomi
12 matches
Mail list logo
