> From: "krad"
> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, "FreeBSD Questions"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 11:29:20 AM
> Subject: possible NFS lockups
> I have a production mail system with an nfs backend. Every now and
> again we
> see the nfs die on a particular head end. However it doesn't die
>
Hi Fabio,
Exokernels are great operating systems for prototyping or learning.
You obviously incur a lot more performance hits when you implement
such an architecture. I haven't looked into the details of
DragonflyBSD too much but they have enough infrastructure to run a
userlevel kernel that is so
yes , i have snifed the mach.. but i dont like the message passing idea..
its from the microkernel species
and theres even a nouveau reincarnation called barrelfish
http://www.barrelfish.org .. wich is a sort of microkernel but running one
kernel core nucleus for each core and message passing each
On 07/31/10 15:06, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
would it be a feasible project to borrow things from freebsd, and start a
project like this? anyone like this idea ??
The code is free to use :-)
anyway, just some thoughts for now..
See also eg Mach.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mach
> would it be a feasible project to borrow things from freebsd, and start a
> project like this? anyone like this idea ??
The code is free to use :-)
> anyway, just some thoughts for now..
See also eg Mach.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mach
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mach_%28ke
5 matches
Mail list logo
