On 4/1/10, Tim Judd wrote:
> On 4/1/10, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Wednesday 31 March 2010 6:32:09 pm Tim Judd wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Just starting to see if I can find other reports. You all probably
>>> have had the "more than one pair of eyes looking at a thing is better
>>> than my eyes a
On 4/1/10, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 March 2010 6:32:09 pm Tim Judd wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Just starting to see if I can find other reports. You all probably
>> have had the "more than one pair of eyes looking at a thing is better
>> than my eyes alone." This is why I'm writing now,
On 4/1/10, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday 01 April 2010 1:14:30 pm Tim Judd wrote:
>> On 4/1/10, John Baldwin wrote:
>> > On Thursday 01 April 2010 10:48:07 am Tim Judd wrote:
>> >> On 4/1/10, John Baldwin wrote:
>> >> > On Wednesday 31 March 2010 6:32:09 pm Tim Judd wrote:
>> >> >> Hi All,
>
Julian Elischer writes:
> Who are you? and what have you done with DES?
I gave him a week off...
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubsc
Gary Jennejohn writes:
> Daniel Rodrick writes:
> > $ file kernel
> > kernel: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (FreeBSD),
> > dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped
> file is confused. FreeBSD uses a monolithic kernel and no shared
> libraries are involved. However
Tsuyoshi Ozawa writes:
> Julian Elischer writes:
> > Who are you? and what have you done with DES?
> Sorry [...]
Never mind, Julian was making a joke at my expense.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
> File is right. The kernel contains relocation entries so kernel modules
> can be linked against it.
"relocation entries" is possibly not the right term, someone with better
knowledge of ELF will have to correct me.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
On Thursday 01 April 2010 1:14:30 pm Tim Judd wrote:
> On 4/1/10, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Thursday 01 April 2010 10:48:07 am Tim Judd wrote:
> >> On 4/1/10, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> > On Wednesday 31 March 2010 6:32:09 pm Tim Judd wrote:
> >> >> Hi All,
> >> >>
> >> >> Just starting to see if
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Mario Lobo wrote:
> > [...]
> > It's compiling right now.
> >
> > I'll post my findings and impressions on results and performance right
> after
> > the next reboot.
>
> So, how is it going? Any benchmarks yet? I'm curious
> if the ne
On 4/1/10, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday 01 April 2010 10:48:07 am Tim Judd wrote:
>> On 4/1/10, John Baldwin wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 31 March 2010 6:32:09 pm Tim Judd wrote:
>> >> Hi All,
>> >>
>> >> Just starting to see if I can find other reports. You all probably
>> >> have had the "mor
On Thursday 01 April 2010 10:48:07 am Tim Judd wrote:
> On 4/1/10, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Wednesday 31 March 2010 6:32:09 pm Tim Judd wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> Just starting to see if I can find other reports. You all probably
> >> have had the "more than one pair of eyes looking at a thi
On Thursday 01 April 2010 15:27:41 Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Mario Lobo wrote:
> > [...]
> > It's compiling right now.
> >
> > I'll post my findings and impressions on results and performance right
> > after the next reboot.
>
> So, how is it going? Any benchmarks yet? I'm curious
> if the ne
Mario Lobo wrote:
> [...]
> It's compiling right now.
>
> I'll post my findings and impressions on results and performance right after
> the next reboot.
So, how is it going? Any benchmarks yet? I'm curious
if the new gcc version will really make a significant
difference.
Best regards
On 4/1/10, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 March 2010 6:32:09 pm Tim Judd wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Just starting to see if I can find other reports. You all probably
>> have had the "more than one pair of eyes looking at a thing is better
>> than my eyes alone." This is why I'm writing now,
On Thursday 01 April 2010 8:38:38 am John Baldwin wrote:
> > 2) even with geom_uzip module and it's dependency zlib loaded, i don't
> > get a mdconfig node '/dev/md?.uzip' to appear.
> >
> > It's been forever since I touched uzip, so I have to ask.
>
> Do you have a md0 device at all? I think yo
On Wednesday 31 March 2010 6:32:09 pm Tim Judd wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Just starting to see if I can find other reports. You all probably
> have had the "more than one pair of eyes looking at a thing is better
> than my eyes alone." This is why I'm writing now, as I'm starting the
> discovery.
>
>
On Thursday 01 April 2010 6:23:50 am Daniel Rodrick wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I'm a newbie and coming from Linux background, and am trying to learn
> FreeBSD now. The first thing I find a little confusing is that the
> final FreeBSD kernel image is shown as a DYNAMICALLY LINKED binary:
>
> $
> $ p
Hi,
Please don't crosspost to many lists. This topic is probably
suitable for hackers@ but not for the other lists.
Daniel Rodrick wrote:
> I'm a newbie and coming from Linux background, and am trying to learn
> FreeBSD now. The first thing I find a little confusing is that the
> final FreeB
On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:53:50 +0530
Daniel Rodrick wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I'm a newbie and coming from Linux background, and am trying to learn
> FreeBSD now. The first thing I find a little confusing is that the
> final FreeBSD kernel image is shown as a DYNAMICALLY LINKED binary:
>
> $
> $ pw
Ali Mashtizadeh wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I have a new motherboard with an ICH7 chipset (G41) and the ata driver
> recognizes it as ATA_I82801GB_S1 (PCI ID 27c08086), but this card does
> not seem to work with the AHCI. Can anyone point me to why this is the
> case? I really need NCQ working for t
Hello List,
I'm a newbie and coming from Linux background, and am trying to learn
FreeBSD now. The first thing I find a little confusing is that the
final FreeBSD kernel image is shown as a DYNAMICALLY LINKED binary:
$
$ pwd
/boot/kernel
$
$ file kernel
kernel: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80
Ali Mashtizadeh wrote:
> I have a new motherboard with an ICH7 chipset (G41) and the ata driver
> recognizes it as ATA_I82801GB_S1 (PCI ID 27c08086), but this card does
> not seem to work with the AHCI. Can anyone point me to why this is the
> case? I really need NCQ working for this machine.
Most
22 matches
Mail list logo
