On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Garrett Cooper wrote:
So what I did was I wrote up a patch to be *I know... here it comes*
more like GNU coreutils' copy of mktemp.
What's the motivation for this? I'm a little confused about why we'd
want to change this when the -t option already exists. Also, does POSIX
I think a better idea would be to dump over the network to another
server. We do that at $(WORK) for diskless machines and it's quite
effective. Currently what we have is very rough and only implemented
on 6.1, but if I get some time this weekend I'll try to clean it up
and provide a patch agains
Hi again Hackers,
Another question that popped up recently in my mind given some of
the stability issues with RAID controllers is: what happens when you
can't dump to a RAID or non-RAIDed PATA/SATA device? In particular,
does it make sense to have the functionality where one could make the
dump
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Hi Hackers,
> Really basic question (because I'm relatively new to the Unix
> scene -- only been using it for the last 10 years, so I don't know if
> this was done for backwards compatibility with SysV) -- is mktemp(1)
> without -t suppos
Hi Hackers,
Really basic question (because I'm relatively new to the Unix
scene -- only been using it for the last 10 years, so I don't know if
this was done for backwards compatibility with SysV) -- is mktemp(1)
without -t supposed to default to $PWD instead of /tmp if a template
is specified,
There's a nasty little bug lurking in jn(3).
#include
#include
int
main(void)
{
double z;
int i, n;
z = 2.4048255576957729;
for (n = 2; n < 10; n++)
printf("%d %e\n", n, jn(n,z));
return (0);
}
troutmask:kargl[446] cc -o z testjn.c -lm
On Thursday 25 February 2010 23:46:03 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> "Matthias Andree" writes:
> > Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
> > > char a[9] = { 'a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g', 'h', 'i' };
> >
> > char a[9] = "abcdefghi";
> >
> > suffices. The compiler knows there isn't room for the terminal '
"Matthias Andree" writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
> > char a[9] = { 'a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g', 'h', 'i' };
> char a[9] = "abcdefghi";
>
> suffices. The compiler knows there isn't room for the terminal '\0'
> and omits it.
Some compilers (gcc at least) warn about it.
DES
--
Dag-Er
> We'll likely go with this solution instead of downgrading Python and the
> related libraries.
In fact I came up with another solution. I realized that since the problem was
related to the process signal mask, instead of called ntpd directly, wrap it up
in a C app that resets the signal mask t
Am 24.02.2010, 20:55 Uhr, schrieb Dag-Erling Smørgrav :
Why is there a 0 after the 'i'? Because when you write "abcdefghi", the
compiler actually stores "abcdefghi\0". That's the definition of
"string" in C: a sequence of characters immediately followed by a 0. If
you don't want the 0 there,
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:50:10PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Before this gets buried on -hackers in another thead... :)
>
> I now have disks appear as block devices for Linux processes (there
> already was commented out code for that in linux_stats.c, I hope my
> version is now `corr
Apologies if this is the wrong list
Are there prepackaged debug versions of the system libraries available
(like 'yum install *-debuginfo' in Fedora and 'apt-get install *-dbg' in
Ubuntu)?
Dr
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 09:57:48AM -0600, Peter Steele wrote:
> >Very wild guess, check the process signal mask of the child for both methods
> >of spawning.
>
> I'm running ntpd through Python. How do I check the process signal mask? I
> did some quick searches and it seems Python does not supp
>Very wild guess, check the process signal mask of the child for both methods
>of spawning.
I'm running ntpd through Python. How do I check the process signal mask? I did
some quick searches and it seems Python does not support sigprocmask().
In my searches I came across this link:
http://bug
On 25 February 2010 15:53, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> On Thu, 25.02.2010 at 10:08:15 +0200, David Naylor wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As some may have noticed on -current I have been working on using
>> stacked unionfs to implement a 'tinderbox' type build system. I have
>> successfully used the scripts to
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 08:12:05AM -0600, Peter Steele wrote:
> >I think problem not in ntpd, since I use ntpdate. And in 50% times, when it
> >run from startup script, it hangs with kernel.
> >No Ctrl+C work, kernel don`t answer for ping, just freeze.
> >Problem somewhere in kernel, maybe in subs
>I think problem not in ntpd, since I use ntpdate. And in 50% times, when it
>run from startup script, it hangs with kernel.
>No Ctrl+C work, kernel don`t answer for ping, just freeze.
>Problem somewhere in kernel, maybe in subsystems that set new time, maybe in
>network(UDP) parts.
>This problem
Alexey Shuvaev writes:
> The flag you should look at is '-g'. GCC supports debuggind symbols
> together with -O2 optimizations.
It is generally not a good idea to use -O2 for debugging versions, since
gcc will optimize away many local variables.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 03:56:35PM -0600, Peter Steele wrote:
> >> How do I get libc built with full debug symbols?
> >
> >I haven't tried it by myself but think here is the way to go: put the
> >following to /etc/make.conf and recompile needed libraries / ports.
> >WITH_DEBUG=yes
> >DEBUG_FLAGS=
On Thu, 25.02.2010 at 10:08:15 +0200, David Naylor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As some may have noticed on -current I have been working on using
> stacked unionfs to implement a 'tinderbox' type build system. I have
> successfully used the scripts to build x11/xorg (and have compared the
> results to using
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:56:35 -0600
Peter Steele wrote:
>> >> How do I get libc built with full debug symbols?
>> >
>> >I haven't tried it by myself but think here is the way to go: put the
>> >following to /etc/make.conf and recompile needed
>> >libraries / ports. WITH_DEBUG=yes
>> >DEBUG_FLAGS
Hi,
As some may have noticed on -current I have been working on using
stacked unionfs
to implement a 'tinderbox' type build system. I have successfully
used the scripts to
build x11/xorg (and have compared the results to using the traditional
approach using
pkg_add). The build system is stable e
22 matches
Mail list logo
