Re: "tar tfv /dev/cd0" speedup patch; Linux compatibility patches

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 08:47:57PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote: > Juergen Lock wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 05:17:37PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote: > >> > >> Could you try the current version of read_open_filename from: > >> > >> http://libarchive.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/libarchive/archive_read_

Linuxolator patches: stat and lseek SEEK_END for disk devices

Hi! Before this gets buried on -hackers in another thead... :) I now have disks appear as block devices for Linux processes (there already was commented out code for that in linux_stats.c, I hope my version is now `correct enough' to be usable [1]), and I made a simple patch to make lseek SEEK_

Re: Anyone updating the Project Ideas page?

>> With gsoc just around the corner I think the project ideas page should >> be updated and moving the whole thing to wiki or maintaining a similar >> page on wiki(along with the original page)  sounds good to me. >> > I'll take the bait and make the page on the wiki. However someone else > will ha

Re: sched_lock mutex and sleepq_wait

Shrivatsan wrote: Hi, I am trying to understand how msleep() routine suspends the currently executing thread. I see that msleep() calls sleepq_wait(). What I don't understand here is the way in which sched_lock mutex is handled. I took the following snippet from FreeBSD 6: sleepq_wait(voi

Re: sched_lock mutex and sleepq_wait

On Tuesday 23 February 2010 2:34:11 am Shrivatsan wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to understand how msleep() routine suspends the currently > executing thread. I see that msleep() calls sleepq_wait(). > > What I don't understand here is the way in which sched_lock mutex is > handled. > > I took t

hastd without openssl

Hi, I make small patch for no build hastd without openssl. Index: sbin/Makefile === --- sbin/Makefile (revision 204220) +++ sbin/Makefile (working copy) @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ SUBDIR= adjkerntz \ growfs \