Re: [patch] extending/completing brandelf's OS knowledge

Kostik Belousov wrote: On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 01:07:44PM +0100, Alexander Best wrote: patch is pretty self explanatory i guess. brandelf should now be able to handle all OSes defined in the current SCO elf specs (26.10.2009). [...] #defineELFOSABI_STANDALONE 255 /* Stan

Re: [patch] extending/completing brandelf's OS knowledge

On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, Kostik Belousov wrote: I do not see a need for such rudimentary ELF editor in the base at all. So, perhaps it's time to move brandelf out of the base? And if so, perhaps Alexander's contribution could be incorporated into a port for it? After the work of dchagin@/bz@,

Re: Unique process id (not pid) and accounting daemon

* cronfy [100124 15:59] wrote: > Hello. > > Sorry for the crosspost, I intended to post this to freebsd-hackers@, but > sent first copy to freebsd-questions@ by mistake. > > > I am trying to create an accounting daemon that would be more precise > than usual BSD system accounting. It should rea

Re: ethernet SiS(190/191) problem driver

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 01:26:46AM +0200, Nikolay Denev wrote: > On 24 Jan, 2010, at 22:17 , Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 01:01:53AM +0700, zloidemon wrote: > >> Hi all! > >> > >> zlobook# uname -a > >> FreeBSD zlobook.local 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #22: Sun Jan 3 >

Unique process id (not pid) and accounting daemon

Hello. Sorry for the crosspost, I intended to post this to freebsd-hackers@, but sent first copy to freebsd-questions@ by mistake. I am trying to create an accounting daemon that would be more precise than usual BSD system accounting. It should read the whole process tree from time to time (say,

Re: ethernet SiS(190/191) problem driver

On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 01:01:53AM +0700, zloidemon wrote: > Hi all! > > zlobook# uname -a > FreeBSD zlobook.local 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #22: Sun Jan 3 12:17:19 > KRAT 2010 r...@zlobook.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/zlobook i386 > > no...@pci0:0:4:0: class=0x02 card=0x080215