Hello
I'm having some troubles, trying to create bootable USB keys.
I found (freebsd-hackers ML archives) a script, supposed to create the
bootable image from my iso file.
But, it still don't boot... (I may do it wrong)
In details:
-We distribute a FreeBSD (4.7, 5.4, 6.2 and 7.2) "custom" server.
hello.
again.
btw: my .img file is 0-filled in its 512 first bytes...
i downloaded the 8-0-BETA3-???.img, it starts with EB3C.
and I think each .img file start like that, right ?
thanks
Samuel Martín Moro
CamTrace
{EPITECH.} tek4
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Samuel Martín Moro wrote:
>
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 03:41:14PM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> krad wrote:
> >There was a change between zfs v7 and v13. IN 7 when you did a zfs list it
> >would show snapshots, after 13 it didnt unless you supplied the switch. It
> >still catches me out as we have a right mix of zfs version
krad wrote:
There was a change between zfs v7 and v13. IN 7 when you did a zfs list it
would show snapshots, after 13 it didnt unless you supplied the switch. It
still catches me out as we have a right mix of zfs version at work, so dont
feel to bad 8)
Try:
# zpool set listsnapshots=on
--
WBR
2009/9/3 Robert Eckardt
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 10:01:28 +0100, krad wrote
> > 2009/9/3 Robert Eckardt
> > On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:09:19 +0200, Adrian Penisoara wrote
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Robert Eckardt
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > > Do I have to be worried?
> > > > I
2009/9/3 krad
>
>
> 2009/9/3 Robert Eckardt
>
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:09:19 +0200, Adrian Penisoara wrote
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Robert Eckardt
>> > wrote:
>> > > Do I have to be worried?
>> > > Is there a memory leak in the current ZFS implementation?
>> > > Why is
2009/9/3 Robert Eckardt
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:09:19 +0200, Adrian Penisoara wrote
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Robert Eckardt
> > wrote:
> > > Do I have to be worried?
> > > Is there a memory leak in the current ZFS implementation?
> > > Why is used space growing slower tha
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:05 PM, krad wrote:
[...]
>
> There was a change between zfs v7 and v13. IN 7 when you did a zfs list it
> would show snapshots, after 13 it didnt unless you supplied the switch. It
> still catches me out as we have a right mix of zfs version at work, so dont
> feel to
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 10:01:28 +0100, krad wrote
> 2009/9/3 Robert Eckardt
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:09:19 +0200, Adrian Penisoara wrote
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Robert Eckardt
> > wrote:
>
> > > Do I have to be worried?
> > > Is there a memory leak in the current Z
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:09:19 +0200, Adrian Penisoara wrote
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Robert Eckardt
> wrote:
> > Do I have to be worried?
> > Is there a memory leak in the current ZFS implementation?
> > Why is used space growing slower than free space is shrinking?
> > Is there s
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Robert Eckardt
wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> after upgrading my backup server to 8.0-BETA2, I noticed that the
> available space shrinks from backup to backup (a tree each day with
> differential rsync) although with each new tree the oldest tree gets
> removed.
>
11 matches
Mail list logo