On Wed, 22-Jul-2009 at 09:48:56 -0700, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
> Andre Albsmeier writes:
> | On Sat, 18-Jul-2009 at 10:25:06 +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
> | > On 18 Jul 2009, at 09:10, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
> | >
> | > > On Fri, 17-Jul-2009 at 12:53:53 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> | > >> Andre Albsme
DarkSoul wrote:
> Anthony Pankov wrote:
> > SGID/SUID bits don't work with shell scripts, do they?
>
> They don't.
>
> ... if they were applied, the following would occur :
> - execve() syscall reads your script's shebang line, and
> the script interpreter is executed, receiving the specified
> ar
Anthony Pankov wrote:
> SGID/SUID bits don't work with shell scripts, do they?
>
> And no mention in chmod(1,2) manual.
They don't.
One reason for this, is that if they were applied, the following would
occur :
- execve() syscall reads your script's shebang line, and the script
interpreter is ex
Anthony Pankov wrote:
SGID/SUID bits don't work with shell scripts, do they?
No
google SUID script security
And no mention in chmod(1,2) manual.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-h
SGID/SUID bits don't work with shell scripts, do they?
And no mention in chmod(1,2) manual.
--
Best regards,
Anthony mailto:a...@mail.ru
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 06:20:36PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
> * Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> > "Shaowei Wang (wsw)" writes:
> > > So what's the direction? Are we going to cut off all the GNU compiler
> > > tool chains and use the llvm/clang when it's mature.
> >
> > Who's "we"?
> >
> > Anyway,
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 04:52:58PM +0100, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
> 2009/7/22 Kostik Belousov :
>
> > I believe that the nearest action that is quite reasonable and
> > profitable by its own merit is divorcing base compiler and compiler used
> > to build ports. Even if this means that we would "onl
the ppi manual states that using ioctl with /dev/ppi is extremely slow. i need
the parallel port to be really fast. i need to communicate with a device that
uses asynchronous transfer at a rate of ~ 2 mhz. so i need the full ISA bus
speed to be able to push/pull data to/from the parallel port witho
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:43:20AM +0200, Alexander Best wrote:
> hi there,
>
> i've written an app in c (and a bit of asm) which needs to do raw parallel
> port io using the i386 opcodes in/out. to get the number of available parallel
> ports installed and their addresses i open and mmap /dev/mem
* Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> "Shaowei Wang (wsw)" writes:
> > So what's the direction? Are we going to cut off all the GNU compiler
> > tool chains and use the llvm/clang when it's mature.
>
> Who's "we"?
>
> Anyway, LLVM *isn't* mature, and it probably won't be for years, if
> ever, so there
2009/7/22 Kostik Belousov :
> I believe that the nearest action that is quite reasonable and
> profitable by its own merit is divorcing base compiler and compiler used
> to build ports. Even if this means that we would "only" have different
> versions of gcc.
On a similar note, has anyone one tr
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 07:23:17PM +0400, Alexander Churanov wrote:
> 2009/7/22 Kostik Belousov :
> > I believe that the nearest action that is quite reasonable and
> > profitable by its own merit is divorcing base compiler and compiler used
> > to build ports. Even if this means that we would "onl
2009/7/22 Kostik Belousov :
> I believe that the nearest action that is quite reasonable and
> profitable by its own merit is divorcing base compiler and compiler used
> to build ports. Even if this means that we would "only" have different
> versions of gcc.
>
I know some ports using "USE_GCC" kn
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 03:38:44AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
> "Shaowei Wang (wsw)" writes:
> > So what's the direction? Are we going to cut off all the GNU compiler
> > tool chains and use the llvm/clang when it's mature.
>
> Who's "we"?
>
> Anyway, LLVM *isn't* mature, and it probably
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Roman Divacky wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 09:18:46AM +0800, Shaowei Wang (wsw) wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Roman Divacky
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:34:29PM +0800, Shaowei Wang (wsw) wrote:
> > > > Hi, hackers!
> > > >
> > >
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 09:18:46AM +0800, Shaowei Wang (wsw) wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Roman Divacky wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:34:29PM +0800, Shaowei Wang (wsw) wrote:
> > > Hi, hackers!
> > >
> > > Recently I am playing the clangbsd i386 branch and it works. I've no
16 matches
Mail list logo
