Nathanael Hoyle wrote:
[snip]
Having been corrected by both you and Joerg (thank you!), I went back
to re-verify my understanding. It appears that while I was slightly
mixing PAE in with PSE, PSE support for 4MB pages was introduced
'silently' with the Pentium, and documented first with the Pen
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 08:14:24PM -0400, Nathanael Hoyle wrote:
Just to be clear, since you say i386 (I presume you mean architecture),
I believe the Physical Address Extensions which allowed 2MB Page Size
bit to be set was introduced with Pentium Pro. Processors
I've got a 7.2 box acting as NIS master, running rpc.yppasswdd. When
remote users try to change their passwords they see:
testing1# passwd mytest
Changing NIS password for mytest
Old Password:
New Password:
Retype New Password:
passwd: pam_chauthtok(): error in service module
On the server I ge
Over the past months I've gotten huge amounts of requests for ATA
related things, so I've whipped up what I use here for FreeBSD 7.2-
Release.
This is a total replacement of the ATA driver, modulerized as in -
current, but based on my WIP not from what might have happend to -
current since I
Alan Cox wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Nathanael Hoyle wrote:
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
i enabled
vm.pmap.pg_ps_enabled: 1
could you please explain what exactly this values means?
because i don't understand why promotions-demotions!=mappings
vm.pmap.pde.promotions: 2703
vm.p
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Nathanael Hoyle wrote:
> Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>
>> i enabled
>> vm.pmap.pg_ps_enabled: 1
>>
>>
>> could you please explain what exactly this values means?
>> because i don't understand why promotions-demotions!=mappings
>>
>> vm.pmap.pde.promotions: 2703
>> vm.pm
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 08:14:24PM -0400, Nathanael Hoyle wrote:
> Just to be clear, since you say i386 (I presume you mean architecture),
> I believe the Physical Address Extensions which allowed 2MB Page Size
> bit to be set was introduced with Pentium Pro. Processors prior to this
> were l
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
i enabled
vm.pmap.pg_ps_enabled: 1
could you please explain what exactly this values means?
because i don't understand why promotions-demotions!=mappings
vm.pmap.pde.promotions: 2703
vm.pmap.pde.p_failures: 6290
vm.pmap.pde.mappings: 610
vm.pmap.pde.demotions: 289
ot
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
other question - tried enabling it on my i386 laptop (256 megs
ram), always
mappings==0, while promitions>demotions>0.
The default starting address for executables on i386 is not aligned
to a 2/4MB page boundary. Hence, "mappings" are much less likely to
other question - tried enabling it on my i386 laptop (256 megs ram),
always
mappings==0, while promitions>demotions>0.
The default starting address for executables on i386 is not aligned to a 2/4MB page boundary.
Hence, "mappings" are much less likely to occur.
certainly
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Wojciech Puchar <
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote:
> i enabled
> vm.pmap.pg_ps_enabled: 1
>
>
> could you please explain what exactly this values means?
> because i don't understand why promotions-demotions!=mappings
>
"mappings" is not what you seem to thi
Mike Meyer wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:01:11 -0400
"Aryeh M. Friedman" wrote:
We have a name server set up that contains all our static IP's (in
office but not for remote workers because they all have dynamic
IP's) we currently use dns/no-ip2 to manage this but I was
wondering if i
In the last episode (Jun 28):
> I have system with 4 core cpu. How can I bind POSIX thread to the one
> core? I mean that this thread can be executed on the fixed core.
See the cpuset(2) and cpuset_setaffinity(2) manpages. Something like this
should work:
#include
#include
#include
#include
We have a name server set up that contains all our static IP's (in
office but not for remote workers because they all have dynamic
IP's) we currently use dns/no-ip2 to manage this but I was
wondering if it is possible to (easily) configure our internal
nameserver to do this?
_
I have system with 4 core cpu. How can I bind POSIX thread to the one core? I
mean that this thread
can be executed on the fixed core.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe,
i enabled
vm.pmap.pg_ps_enabled: 1
could you please explain what exactly this values means?
because i don't understand why promotions-demotions!=mappings
vm.pmap.pde.promotions: 2703
vm.pmap.pde.p_failures: 6290
vm.pmap.pde.mappings: 610
vm.pmap.pde.demotions: 289
other question - tried ena
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009, Sebastian Huber wrote:
suppose that a certain time event triggered several callout functions. What
happens if the first of these callout functions blocks on the Giant lock?
Does this delay all further callout functions until the Giant lock is
available for the first callo
Hi,
I've recently updated my amd64 system from 6.4 to 7.2-Stable - this works
fine, but I've started picking up errors on the console:
ad36: TIMEOUT - FLUSHCACHE retrying (1 retry left)
The drive (an WD5000AAKS) appears healthy - SMART reports no errors, or
problems - and the timeouts only
Hi,
suppose that a certain time event triggered several callout functions.
What happens if the first of these callout functions blocks on the Giant
lock? Does this delay all further callout functions until the Giant lock
is available for the first callout function? What happens if one of the
19 matches
Mail list logo
