Re: dd copy of FreeBSD-7.2 won't boot

2009-06-22 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Jim Flowers wrote: > I have a remote server that was dd copied from one hard drive to > another - essentially the same size. The disk device name (ad4) is > the same but the geometry for the new drive has a CHS of 969021/16/63 > > On booting it hangs at: > > F1FreeBSD

Re: ZFS filesystem not showing total size?

2009-06-22 Thread xorquewasp
On 2009-06-22 21:28:26, Artem Belevich wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:31 PM, wrote: > > ad11: 953869MB at ata5-slave SATA300 > .. > > ad14: 476940MB at ata7-master SATA300 > > ad16: 476940MB at ata8-master SATA300 > .. > ># zpool create storage raidz ad11 ad14 ad16 > > I seem to have less s

Re: ZFS filesystem not showing total size?

2009-06-22 Thread Artem Belevich
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:31 PM, wrote: > ad11: 953869MB at ata5-slave SATA300 .. > ad14: 476940MB at ata7-master SATA300 > ad16: 476940MB at ata8-master SATA300 .. ># zpool create storage raidz ad11 ad14 ad16 > I seem to have less storage than I'd expect. Is there something wrong > with this s

dd copy of FreeBSD-7.2 won't boot

2009-06-22 Thread Jim Flowers
I have a remote server that was dd copied from one hard drive to another - essentially the same size. The disk device name (ad4) is the same but the geometry for the new drive has a CHS of 969021/16/63 On booting it hangs at: F1FreeBSD Boot: F1 I copied the MBR with 'boot0cfg -B -

ZFS filesystem not showing total size?

2009-06-22 Thread xorquewasp
Hello. I've got the following hardware setup: ad10: 76319MB at ata5-master SATA300 ad11: 953869MB at ata5-slave SATA300 ad12: 953869MB at ata6-master SATA300 ad14: 476940MB at ata7-master SATA300 ad16: 476940MB at ata8-master SATA300 ad12 is used as a single-disk pool. ad10 is formatted UFS

Re: Number of open files per process

2009-06-22 Thread Alexey Shuvaev
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:12:34AM -0700, Peter Steele wrote: > Is it possible to determine the number of open files per process? We > want to monitor this via a separate process and issue an alarm if some > threshold is crossed. > procstat -f ___ freeb

Re: Number of open files per process

2009-06-22 Thread Bill Moran
In response to "Peter Steele" : > Is it possible to determine the number of open files per process? We > want to monitor this via a separate process and issue an alarm if some > threshold is crossed. The fstat command will do this for you. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. http://people.c

Number of open files per process

2009-06-22 Thread Peter Steele
Is it possible to determine the number of open files per process? We want to monitor this via a separate process and issue an alarm if some threshold is crossed. ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr

Re: is RTL8139 THAT bad?

2009-06-22 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Why it's THAT bad? Because CPU always have to copy frames to/from the controller. comment says card do DMA. just then it has to copy but within main memory not PCI. These CPU cycles could have been used in other task to give more performance such as SSH encryption/decryption, checksum co

Re: is RTL8139 THAT bad?

2009-06-22 Thread Wojciech Puchar
But - this computer can do memcpy at 80MB/s, so at 3.5MB/s it should be 5% CPU for memcpy, and one interrupt per one packet (2500 packets/s). Is something more that make it consume >50% CPU? Accessing the on-card memory through PCI is guaranteed to be slower than the main memory, and depending