Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>
> > Wojciech Puchar writes:
> >> Why it's THAT bad?
> >
> > http://svn.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/pci/if_rl.c
> >
> > Scroll down past the copyright, license and attribution. Read the
> > 38-line comment that explains just how crappy this chip really is.
>
> Well - reall
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 05:14:29PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> i have pentium 200 with that card. doing ftp from other machine, getting
> 3.5MB/s (HDD can 10MB/s, DMA) having 45%-55% interrupt load.
>
> when sending it's not that bad.
>
> tried writing file to disk with cat /dev/zero >file,
Wojciech Puchar writes:
Why it's THAT bad?
http://svn.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/pci/if_rl.c
Scroll down past the copyright, license and attribution. Read the
38-line comment that explains just how crappy this chip really is.
Well - really "low end".
But - this computer can do memcpy at 80
Wojciech Puchar writes:
> Why it's THAT bad?
http://svn.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/pci/if_rl.c
Scroll down past the copyright, license and attribution. Read the
38-line comment that explains just how crappy this chip really is.
Executive summary: every single transmitted frame must be copied fr
i have pentium 200 with that card. doing ftp from other machine, getting
3.5MB/s (HDD can 10MB/s, DMA) having 45%-55% interrupt load.
when sending it's not that bad.
tried writing file to disk with cat /dev/zero >file, it's only 3% ints
with 10MB/s traffic.
Why it's THAT bad?
3.5MB/s is le
5 matches
Mail list logo
