how to install samba in freebsd
advance thanks
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
+--- Julian Elischer, 2009-06-17 ---
| Alexander Best wrote:
| >hi everybody,
| >
| >here's just a quick hack i applied to find. i very often use the -size
| >switch
| >and always forget if you need to append "m" or "M" for megabyte or "k" or
| >"K"
| >for kilobyte. after applying the pat
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
I have been working on/off on it.
I am trying to find my work in progress sources, but I think they got lost
when a hard disk died.
This is all I have found:
http://www.in-nomine.org/~asmodai/valgrind/valgrind-trunk-for-freebsd.diff
Any news on valgri
Please find attached three patches which result in raising NGROUPS to
1024, making programs in the base system immune to changing values of
NGROUPS, and pave the way for NGROUPS to be boot time configurable.
The first two patches (ngroups-catman.diff and ngroups-posix.diff)
are userland cleanups.
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, John Baldwin wrote:
These are the key frames. It looks like uipc_peeraddr() tries to lock two
unp locks w/o any protection from the global unp linkage lock. I've changed
it to use the same locking as uipc_accept() where it first grabs a read lock
on the linkage lock and
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 13:17:37 John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 June 2009 3:52:54 pm Mel Flynn wrote:
> > On Wednesday 17 June 2009 04:15:26 John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 16 June 2009 7:01:45 pm Mel Flynn wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 16 June 2009 11:02:42 John Baldwin wrote:
> > > > >
cheers.
Are you sure this is wise? after all 125 millibytes would be 1 bit..
Agree. While lots of people use m instead of M and b instead of B, this is
not right to correct proper behavior to improper just for them.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.or
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 3:52:54 pm Mel Flynn wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 June 2009 04:15:26 John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 June 2009 7:01:45 pm Mel Flynn wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 16 June 2009 11:02:42 John Baldwin wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 16 June 2009 1:52:23 pm Mel Flynn wrote:
> > > > > Hi
Alexander Best wrote:
hi everybody,
here's just a quick hack i applied to find. i very often use the -size switch
and always forget if you need to append "m" or "M" for megabyte or "k" or "K"
for kilobyte. after applying the patch find accepts both. ;-)
cheers.
Are you sure this is wise? aft
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 04:15:26 John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 June 2009 7:01:45 pm Mel Flynn wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 June 2009 11:02:42 John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 16 June 2009 1:52:23 pm Mel Flynn wrote:
> > > > Hi John,
> > > >
> > > > On Tuesday 16 June 2009 04:19:57 John Bald
hi everybody,
here's just a quick hack i applied to find. i very often use the -size switch
and always forget if you need to append "m" or "M" for megabyte or "k" or "K"
for kilobyte. after applying the patch find accepts both. ;-)
cheers.
findpatch
Description: Binary data
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
WP> > > In other words, is there still reason for the "highly experimental
WP> > > feature" warning?
WP> >
WP> > Last time when I added the warning, it was because some data corruption
WP> > issue that can be identified by fsx which I didn't got a chanc
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 7:01:45 pm Mel Flynn wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 June 2009 11:02:42 John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 June 2009 1:52:23 pm Mel Flynn wrote:
> > > Hi John,
> > >
> > > On Tuesday 16 June 2009 04:19:57 John Baldwin wrote:
> > > > On Monday 15 June 2009 5:53:05 pm Mel Flynn wrot
2009/6/17 Rick C. Petty :
> I read somewhere that there isn't enough space in the boot2 loader to put
> such logic. You're only guaranteed 15 512-byte sectors or 7680 bytes, if
> you use any UFS partition. It's pretty tight; I think you will find it
> difficult to insert another file system in t
14 matches
Mail list logo