In <20090519193727.7512e4fc...@xroff.net>, emor...@xroff.net write:
>I have read recently this
>http://www.wwpi.com/hardware/hardware/6540-ethernet-tunneling-through-pci-express-inter-processor-communication-low-latency-storage-io
(From a company that makes PCIe switches to connect multiple root
c
Hello, don't know if this has been discussed but here it goes.
I have read recently this
http://www.wwpi.com/hardware/hardware/6540-ethernet-tunneling-through-pci-express-inter-processor-communication-low-latency-storage-io
It's about using PCIe to connect 2 servers directly, without using
et
Hello,
Is there any ongoing work on adding support for IPv6 to BSNMP? Do you
have an idea of how much effort it would need?
Thanks in advance.
--
My preferred quotation of Robert Louis Stevenson is "You cannot
make an omelette without breaking eggs". Not because I like the
omelettes, but becaus
On 2009-05-19 09:51:08, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> Even so, you shouldn't need a cross-binutils, only a native
> (amd64) binutils. Your port won't be a cross port, but a
> native amd64 port. The native amd64 GNAT will need a native
> binutils, not a cross binutils. The only thing you will have
>
On Tue, 19 May 2009, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 2009-05-18 18:36:15, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Hmm, if the system binutils is 2.15, then it should build
as a cross. You can do a cross build of all FreeBSD - I
think you just set TARGET="amd64" to build amd64 from
a different arch. Part of
On Tue, 19 May 2009, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 2009-05-18 18:36:15, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Well, I used a newer binutils on sparc when I did the original
port. Once I built the cross compiler and binutils toolset,
I was done with it. After the native compiler is built using
the cross
On Tuesday 19 May 2009 3:23:39 am Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm about to factor out some taskqueue-alike code from USB(II) and I need to
> know at which priority taskqueues are running. I know there is a priority
> argument which can be specified for TASK_INIT(), but tracing in the co
On 2009-05-18 18:36:15, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> Well, I used a newer binutils on sparc when I did the original
> port. Once I built the cross compiler and binutils toolset,
> I was done with it. After the native compiler is built using
> the cross tools, you should be able to rebuild the native
>
Hi,
I'm about to factor out some taskqueue-alike code from USB(II) and I need to
know at which priority taskqueues are running. I know there is a priority
argument which can be specified for TASK_INIT(), but tracing in the code
shows that this is just a queue-priority. At which priority level i
9 matches
Mail list logo
