Ed,
Thanks :) I'll be implementing this as discussed over the next few
months thanks for the technical detail I've been extremely busy with
finals. I will write the list with my thoughts within the next week,
sorry for the delay.
=jt
On May 8, 2009, at 17:41, Ed Schouten wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 11:12:03PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 08:07:46PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> > Colin Percival recently pointed out some issues
> > with tar and fdescfs. Part of the problem
> > here is tar; I need to rethink some of the
> > traversal logic.
>
Hi,
* vasanth raonaik wrote:
> Hello Jt,
>
> I am a newbee in this alias. I am having a very basic question. It would be
> really good if you could give me some of this information.
> Could you please elaborate on what is the current architecture of sysctl
> implementation and How the concurrenc
Just an update.
Finally managed to get the i386 -> amd64 compiler to compile
gcc 4.4.0. It took a few Makefile patches as for some reason,
cross compilation breaks gnatmake.
About to try to get the amd64 compiler to compile itself and
run the test suite.
Added a system-freebsd_x86_64.ads profile
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 08:07:46PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> Colin Percival recently pointed out some issues
> with tar and fdescfs. Part of the problem
> here is tar; I need to rethink some of the
> traversal logic.
>
> But fdescfs is really wonky:
>
> * This is a nit, but: ls /dev/fd/18 s
Your kernel thread likely has a higher priority than userspace threads.
Ryan Stone
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebs
Hi,
I'm writing a FreeBSD kernel module and I think I really misunderstand
something. My module spawns a thread, which should be running while
the module is loaded. The thread does some work and then should yield
for other threads. However, if there are no other threads waiting,
then I would like t
hi,
Since the comment in the kernel is:
'Note: fputsock() is deprecated, see comment for fgetsock().'
I'm looking for a replacement, on the other hand, this quote:
deprecated
Said of a program or feature that is considered obsolescent
and in the process of bei
> On Friday 08 May 2009, Danny Braniss wrote:
> > Hi,
> > this is a:
> > USB to Parallel-ATA bridge(0x0c05), Sunplus Technology Inc.(0x04fc)
> > or in english, a nifty dongle that can be connected to ata/sata disk, but
> > umass fails to detected it fully, and detaches it.
> >
> > any hints? q
On Friday 08 May 2009, Danny Braniss wrote:
> Hi,
> this is a:
> USB to Parallel-ATA bridge(0x0c05), Sunplus Technology Inc.(0x04fc)
> or in english, a nifty dongle that can be connected to ata/sata disk, but
> umass fails to detected it fully, and detaches it.
>
> any hints? quircks?
> thanks
Hi,
this is a:
USB to Parallel-ATA bridge(0x0c05), Sunplus Technology Inc.(0x04fc)
or in english, a nifty dongle that can be connected to ata/sata disk, but
umass fails to detected it fully, and detaches it.
any hints? quircks?
thanks,
danny
_
Hello,
sporadically, I observe a strange but serious problem in our large NFS
environment. NFS servers are Linux and OS X with StorNext/Xsan cluster
filesystems, NFS clients Linux and FreeBSD.
NFS client A changes a file, but nfs client B (running on FreeBSD) does
still see the old version.
12 matches
Mail list logo