Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
Luiz Otavio O Souza escreveu:
Hello hackers,
Is there a way to set the mss for a socket ? Like you can do in linux
with setsockopt(TCP_MAXSEG) ?
So i can set the maximum size of packets (or sort of) from a simple
userland program.
you mean sysctl -w net.inet.tcp
Andriy Gapon writes:
| I have some vague thoughts on using SW_WATCHDOG and a hardware watchdog
| together.
| I think this could be useful but I am not sure how to implement this.
| The idea is this: timeout for SW_WATCHDOG is smaller than timeout for hw
| wd; when some freeze happens sw wd logic
Yep that's what I came up with after looking though the code thanks
for the link though, always good to get confirmation that I didn't
miss something.
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "John Baldwin"
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 1:55:12 pm Steven Hartland wrote:
How can
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 1:55:12 pm Steven Hartland wrote:
> How can I increase the maximum number or ptys available on FreeBSD 7.0?
>
> It seems that currently the machine is maxing out at 512 but there is
> still loads of capacity left on the machine.
>
> Ideally would like to double at least
0n Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 10:53:06PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
You can increase the maximum amount of PTYs by editing a lot of source
files on your system. There is some good news: in -CURRENT we switched
to Unix98-style PTYs (/dev/pts/%u). Right now the maximum amount of PTYs
is limited to 1000 (0
Hey Sergey, whatever you are using for a mail client SUCKS
real bad at the moment..
it's really messing up your outgoing mails..
note the mail below
Sergey Babkin wrote:
Apr 2, 2009 01:03:48 AM, [1]peterjer...@optushome.com.au wrot= :
>On 2009-Mar-30 18:45:30 -0700, Maxim Sobolev <
Apr 2, 2009 01:03:48 AM, [1]peterjer...@optushome.com.au wrot= e:
>On 2009-Mar-30 18:45:30 -0700, Maxim Sobolev <[2]sobo...@freebsd.org>
wrote:
>>You don't really need to = do it on every execve() unconditionally.
It
>>could be done on de= mand in libc, so that only when thread p
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Gabriele Modena wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
We are certainly not uninterested in projects along these lines, but I
think the trick will be creating a convincing proposal that argues that (a)
you can do the work in a summer, (b) there's a co
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
> We are certainly not uninterested in projects along these lines, but I think
> the trick will be creating a convincing proposal that argues that (a) you
> can do the work in a summer, (b) there's a compelling usage case for
> including the re
On 4/2/09, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Friday, March 27, 2009 a las 05:52:40PM +0100, Paul B. Mahol
> escribió:
>
>> On 3/27/09, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > When I boot my EeePC from USB key (/dev/da0s1a) -CURRENT it sees the two
>> > SSD
>> > only
>> > as
>> >
>> > $ ls -
Luiz Otavio O Souza escreveu:
Hello hackers,
Is there a way to set the mss for a socket ? Like you can do in linux
with setsockopt(TCP_MAXSEG) ?
So i can set the maximum size of packets (or sort of) from a simple
userland program.
I've read the code and i cannot find by myself (at least fr
--- On Thu, 4/2/09, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> I have some vague thoughts on using SW_WATCHDOG and a
> hardware watchdog together.
> I think this could be useful but I am not sure how to
> implement this.
> The idea is this: timeout for SW_WATCHDOG is smaller than
> timeout for hw wd; when
> some f
Hello hackers,
Is there a way to set the mss for a socket ? Like you can do in linux with
setsockopt(TCP_MAXSEG) ?
So i can set the maximum size of packets (or sort of) from a simple userland
program.
I've read the code and i cannot find by myself (at least from a 30minute
reading) a singl
I have some vague thoughts on using SW_WATCHDOG and a hardware watchdog
together.
I think this could be useful but I am not sure how to implement this.
The idea is this: timeout for SW_WATCHDOG is smaller than timeout for hw wd;
when
some freeze happens sw wd logic kicks in first, stops hw wd an
Ed Maste wrote:
2009/3/24 Vladimir Ermakov :
Hello, All
Describe my problem:
have volume RAID-10 (SAS-HDD x 6) on Adaptec RAID 5805
2 HHD of 6 have errors in smart data (damaged)
i am try read file /var/db/mysql/ibdata1 from this volume
system does not respond ( lost access to ssh ) after r
El día Friday, March 27, 2009 a las 05:52:40PM +0100, Paul B. Mahol escribió:
> On 3/27/09, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > When I boot my EeePC from USB key (/dev/da0s1a) -CURRENT it sees the two SSD
> > only
> > as
> >
> > $ ls -l /dev/ad*
> > /dev/ad2
> > /dev/ad2s1
> > /dev/ad2s1
16 matches
Mail list logo
