Re: portupgrade spurious skips

2009-02-27 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Dan Nelson (from Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:57:37 -0600): In the last episode (Feb 26), Nate Eldredge said: In the past few months I've noticed a bug in portupgrade. When I update my ports tree and do `portupgrade -a', often a few ports will be skipped, supposedly because another port on w

Re: hosted, or not (Re: Renaming all symbols in libmp(3))

2009-02-27 Thread Roman Divacky
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:46:22PM -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > >> By default, LLVM has a built-in prototype of pow(), similar to > > >> GCC. Unlike GCC, LLVM raises a compiler error by default ... > > > ... it's invalid code to have a function named pow() > > in a hosted environment wh

hosted, or not (Re: Renaming all symbols in libmp(3))

2009-02-27 Thread perryh
> >> By default, LLVM has a built-in prototype of pow(), similar to > >> GCC. Unlike GCC, LLVM raises a compiler error by default ... > ... it's invalid code to have a function named pow() > in a hosted environment which is not /The/ pow(). ^^^ I don't suppose LLVM supports