In response to Christian Peron :
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:58:09AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> [..]
> >
> > Why isn't the field an unsigned int / size_t? I don't see much value
> > in having the size be signed...
>
> No idea :) This code long predates me.
It's that way because the o
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:58:09AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
[..]
>
> Why isn't the field an unsigned int / size_t? I don't see much value
> in having the size be signed...
No idea :) This code long predates me.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.or
On Feb 23, 2009, at 11:08 AM, Christian Peron wrote:
This issue has come up a number of times. I was looking into fixing
this but I
just have not had the time. The basic issue is our shmid_ds
structure:
struct shmid_ds {
struct ipc_perm shm_perm; /* operation permission
st
This issue has come up a number of times. I was looking into fixing this but I
just have not had the time. The basic issue is our shmid_ds structure:
struct shmid_ds {
struct ipc_perm shm_perm; /* operation permission structure */
int shm_segsz; /* size of s
> On Wed, 2006-Dec-13 10:50:21 -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> >In response to Bill Moran :
> >> sysctl kern.ipc.shmmax=22
> >> kern.ipc.shmmax: 21 -> -2094967296
Someone was nice enough to file a PR related to this:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/130274
We'd be happy
On 22.02-16:28, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:07:19AM +, ttw+...@cobbled.net wrote:
> > On 21.02-22:49, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > [ ... ]
> > > >this patch should remove the dependancy on the definition of
> > > >NGROUPS_MAX as a static constant and implement it as a writabl
6 matches
Mail list logo
