2008/11/20 Olivier SMEDTS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 07:49:06PM +, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
>> On Thursday 20 November 2008 18:57:53 Olivier SMEDTS wrote:
>> > What is your MACHINE_ARCH ?
>> > Mine is amd64, I think there's a problem with the conditional in
>> > sys/boot/i38
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 07:49:06PM +, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
> On Thursday 20 November 2008 18:57:53 Olivier SMEDTS wrote:
> > What is your MACHINE_ARCH ?
> > Mine is amd64, I think there's a problem with the conditional in
> > sys/boot/i386/gptzfsboot/Makefile.
> > ld doesn't need gptzfsboot
On Thursday 20 November 2008 18:57:53 Olivier SMEDTS wrote:
> What is your MACHINE_ARCH ?
> Mine is amd64, I think there's a problem with the conditional in
> sys/boot/i386/gptzfsboot/Makefile.
> ld doesn't need gptzfsboot.o on i386.
>
> Olivier
>
> 2008/11/20 Olivier SMEDTS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
2008/11/20 Olivier SMEDTS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/11/20 Olivier SMEDTS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> 2008/11/20 Pascal Hofstee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 01:46:31 -
>>> "Pegasus Mc Cleaft" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
Hi everyone,
I am having difficulties re
2008/11/20 Olivier SMEDTS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/11/20 Pascal Hofstee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 01:46:31 -
>> "Pegasus Mc Cleaft" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I am having difficulties rebuilding the world after some patches
>>> were made toda
2008/11/20 Pascal Hofstee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 01:46:31 -
> "Pegasus Mc Cleaft" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I am having difficulties rebuilding the world after some patches
>> were made today. I was wondering if anyone else is experiencing the
>>
What is your MACHINE_ARCH ?
Mine is amd64, I think there's a problem with the conditional in
sys/boot/i386/gptzfsboot/Makefile.
ld doesn't need gptzfsboot.o on i386.
Olivier
2008/11/20 Olivier SMEDTS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/11/20 Pascal Hofstee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 01:
Hi,
> Will you tell us which one you selected?
Happy to, when I know which & why, likely it'll be a while before
that. Just an unpaid hobby, not spending 8 hours/day on selection/install
tuning. Whether then I'll remember to post, or you'll want to
remind me, we'll see :-)
PS I started with /us
On November 20, 2008 02:42 am Nate Eldredge wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Nov 2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:48:36PM -0800, Nate Eldredge wrote:
> >> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 05:39:36PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> I hope that
On Nov 20, 2008, at 4:03 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
This has two problems, but I'm probably missing something:
1) See my original post, re: users of our systems use "dmesg" to find
out what the status of the system is. By "status" I don't mean "from
the point the kernel finished to now", I li
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:24:21 +0100, "Julian Stacey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi hackers,
> Maybe Some of you might suggest some software I might install, Wiki I guess. ?
> I got zero response from ports@, I could use some reccomendations please.
> PS From http://wiki.freebsd.org/HelpContents
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 01:46:31 -
"Pegasus Mc Cleaft" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am having difficulties rebuilding the world after some patches
> were made today. I was wondering if anyone else is experiencing the
> same troubles?
>
> ld -static -N --gc-sections -nostd
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:48:36PM -0800, Nate Eldredge wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 05:39:36PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
I hope that never gets committed - it will make debugging kernel
problems muc
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:53:07AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > This is deliberate. If the system panics, stuff that was in the
> > > message buffer (and might not be on disk) can be read when the
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:48:36PM -0800, Nate Eldredge wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 05:39:36PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>
>>> I hope that never gets committed - it will make debugging kernel
>>> problems much harder. There is already a kern.m
Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This is deliberate. If the system panics, stuff that was in the
> > message buffer (and might not be on disk) can be read when the
> > system reboots. If there is no crashdump, this might be the only
> > re
16 matches
Mail list logo