Re: NET.ISR and CPU utilization performance w/ HP DL 585 using FreeBSD 7.1 Beta2

2008-11-17 Thread Won De Erick
> - Original Message > From: Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org > Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 5:21:04 AM > Subject: Re: NET.ISR and CPU utilization performance w/ HP DL 585 using > FreeBSD 7.1 Beta2 > > Won De Erick wrote: > > > I compiled the follo

RE: How can I add new binaries to the mfsroot image?

2008-11-17 Thread Peter Steele
>I'll have to check this out. I'm not getting anywhere with trying to >customize mfsroot with my current approach... The goal we are trying to achieve btw is to make gmirror available during an install so that the file systems are mirrored right from the get-go, so that we can avoid having to go t

RE: How can I add new binaries to the mfsroot image?

2008-11-17 Thread Peter Steele
>I'll have to check this out. I'm not getting anywhere with trying to >customize mfsroot with my current approach... The goal we are trying to achieve btw is to make gmirror available during an install so that the file systems are mirrored right from the get-go, so that we can avoid having to go t

Re: NET.ISR and CPU utilization performance w/ HP DL 585 using FreeBSD 7.1 Beta2

2008-11-17 Thread Ivan Voras
Won De Erick wrote: > I compiled the following em driver for Intel NIC Pro (82571) w/ FreeBSD 7.1 > Beta 2 on HPDL 585 machine having 16CPUs. > > http://people.yandex-team.ru/~wawa/ > > With net.isr.direct=1, I made some changes on kthreads(default=2) for em0 and > em1's rx. > > dev.em.0.rx_k

Re: Giant lock, bce and uhc using the same irq

2008-11-17 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Monday 17 November 2008, Ed Schouten wrote: > * Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > P.S. In 8.0 there is a new USB stack that is Giant-free. > > I'm not sure this is completely true. Maybe HPS could explain it in more > detail, but Giant still seems to be used pretty often. All the int

Re: Giant lock, bce and uhc using the same irq

2008-11-17 Thread Ed Schouten
* Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > P.S. In 8.0 there is a new USB stack that is Giant-free. I'm not sure this is completely true. Maybe HPS could explain it in more detail, but Giant still seems to be used pretty often. -- Ed Schouten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> WWW: http://80386.nl/ pgpCr

Re: Ответ: KLD loading, liking

2008-11-17 Thread Ed Schouten
* Aleksandr Litvinov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > You can receive a little information about KLD from the book > "designing BSD rootkits". I don't own this book myself, but a colleague at Snow B.V. once showed it to me. I only looked through it a couple of minutes, but it seemed like a b

Re: KLD loading, liking

2008-11-17 Thread Alexandre Fiveg
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 02:34:28PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Alexej Sokolov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Not only that. The use of the MODULE_DEPEND macro allows one module to > > access the variables of modules on which it depends. > > No. Any module X can access any public variable

RE: How can I add new binaries to the mfsroot image?

2008-11-17 Thread Peter Steele
>I'm not sure, but probably the installation CD doesn't carry shared libraries at all? All binaries in /stand are >static-linked ones. Yeah, that is absolutely the problem--no shared libraries are available when sysinstall is running. >You could also try scripts from mfsbsd project: >http://peop

Re: Giant lock, bce and uhc using the same irq

2008-11-17 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 05:14:21PM +0200, Murat Balaban wrote: > Hello hackers, > > In one of my production servers (64-bit Intel Xeon machine) running > > 6.3-RELEASE-p4 (amd64) FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE-p4 #0: Fri Sep 12 17:07:19 > EEST 2008 > > I see this "top -S" output excerpt: > > 32 root

Ответ: KLD loading, liking

2008-11-17 Thread Aleksandr Litvinov
2008/11/17, Alexej Sokolov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:09:00AM +0100, Ed Schouten wrote: >> * Alexej Sokolov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > What exact does the macro MODULE_DEPEND ? The man page is to short, and >> > I >> > guess it tell no all things that the macro does. >

Giant lock, bce and uhc using the same irq

2008-11-17 Thread Murat Balaban
Hello hackers, In one of my production servers (64-bit Intel Xeon machine) running 6.3-RELEASE-p4 (amd64) FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE-p4 #0: Fri Sep 12 17:07:19 EEST 2008 I see this "top -S" output excerpt: 32 root 1 -68 -187 0K16K *Giant 0 48.3H 3.08% irq17: bce1 uhci1 What I get f

Re: KLD loading, liking

2008-11-17 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Alexej Sokolov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Not only that. The use of the MODULE_DEPEND macro allows one module to > access the variables of modules on which it depends. No. Any module X can access any public variable or function in the kernel or in any other module Y, but loading X will fail if

Re: NET.ISR and CPU utilization performance w/ HP DL 585 using FreeBSD 7.1 Beta2

2008-11-17 Thread Won De Erick
> - Original Message > From: Won De Erick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org > Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 7:18:46 PM > Subject: Re: NET.ISR and CPU utilization performance w/ HP DL 585 using > FreeBSD 7.

Re: KLD loading, liking

2008-11-17 Thread Alexej Sokolov
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:09:00AM +0100, Ed Schouten wrote: > * Alexej Sokolov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What exact does the macro MODULE_DEPEND ? The man page is to short, and I > > guess it tell no all things that the macro does. > > MODULE_DEPEND is used to say: this kernel module also d

Re: How can I add new binaries to the mfsroot image?

2008-11-17 Thread Stanislav Sedov
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 14:59:29 -0800 "Peter Steele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned: > > What's weird is that I can open a fixit shell after the install.cfg > script fails and then run the same commands interactively and they work > fine. Why would work these commands work in an interactive fixit she