Re: strange behaviour with /sbin/init and serial console

2008-10-31 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 01:28:02PM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > Ed Schouten wrote: >> Hello Theirry, >> >> * Thierry Herbelot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> with the following patch on /sbin/init, I have two different >>> behaviours depending on the console type (on a i386/32 PC) : >>> - on a video

Re: includes, configure, /usr/lib vs. /usr/local/lib, and linux coders

2008-10-31 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Friday 31 October 2008 20:30:46 Steve Franks wrote: > Let's backup. What's the 'right' way to get a bloody linux program > that expects all it's headers in /usr/include to compile on freebsd > where all the headers are in /usr/local/include? That's all I'm > really asking. Specifically, it's

Re: includes, configure, /usr/lib vs. /usr/local/lib, and linux coders

2008-10-31 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Nate Eldredge wrote: On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Steve Franks wrote: Let's backup. What's the 'right' way to get a bloody linux program that expects all it's headers in /usr/include to compile on freebsd where all the headers are in /usr/local/include? That's all I'm really ask

Re: strange behaviour with /sbin/init and serial console

2008-10-31 Thread Scott Long
Ed Schouten wrote: Hello Theirry, * Thierry Herbelot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: with the following patch on /sbin/init, I have two different behaviours depending on the console type (on a i386/32 PC) : - on a video console, I see the expected two messages, - on a serial console, the messages a

Re: strange behaviour with /sbin/init and serial console

2008-10-31 Thread Ed Schouten
* Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The multiplexed console feature is one thing that linux got right. In a > corporate setting, you really need both a serial console and a video > console in order to effectively manage the machines, as you want to be > able to access them both remotely and

Re: includes, configure, /usr/lib vs. /usr/local/lib, and linux coders

2008-10-31 Thread Nate Eldredge
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Steve Franks wrote: Let's backup. What's the 'right' way to get a bloody linux program that expects all it's headers in /usr/include to compile on freebsd where all the headers are in /usr/local/include? That's all I'm really asking. Specifically, it's looking for libusb

Re: includes, configure, /usr/lib vs. /usr/local/lib, and linux coders

2008-10-31 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2008-Oct-31 11:23:53 -0700, Steve Franks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I believe someone has told me on this list that the proper way to >compile a linux program is to run configure >--includedir=/usr/local/include --libdir=/usr/local/lib. Is that >correct? Yes. The FreeBSD toolchain does not a

Re: includes, configure, /usr/lib vs. /usr/local/lib, and linux coders

2008-10-31 Thread Steve Franks
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Nate Eldredge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Steve Franks wrote: > >> I believe someone has told me on this list that the proper way to >> compile a linux program is to run configure >> --includedir=/usr/local/include --libdir=/usr/local/lib. > >

Re: strange behaviour with /sbin/init and serial console

2008-10-31 Thread Ed Schouten
Hello Theirry, * Thierry Herbelot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > with the following patch on /sbin/init, I have two different behaviours > depending on the console type (on a i386/32 PC) : > - on a video console, I see the expected two messages, > - on a serial console, the messages are not display

includes, configure, /usr/lib vs. /usr/local/lib, and linux coders

2008-10-31 Thread Steve Franks
I believe someone has told me on this list that the proper way to compile a linux program is to run configure --includedir=/usr/local/include --libdir=/usr/local/lib. Is that correct? I've got a bunch of linux weenies trying to tell me their code isn't broken because I'm supposed to have headers

Re: open(2) and O_NOATIME

2008-10-31 Thread Xin LI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Schenkeveld wrote: [...] > utimes(2) allows non-root users to (re)set atime provided they own the > file or have write permission. Having O_NOATIME follow the same rules > would not break any assumed security any further than utimes(2) already >

Re: strange behaviour with /sbin/init and serial console

2008-10-31 Thread Thierry Herbelot
Le Friday 31 October 2008, Jeremy Chadwick a écrit : > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 05:46:23PM +0100, Thierry Herbelot wrote: > > with the following patch on /sbin/init, I have two different behaviours > > depending on the console type (on a i386/32 PC) : > > - on a video console, I see the expected two

Re: strange behaviour with /sbin/init and serial console

2008-10-31 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 05:46:23PM +0100, Thierry Herbelot wrote: > with the following patch on /sbin/init, I have two different behaviours > depending on the console type (on a i386/32 PC) : > - on a video console, I see the expected two messages, > - on a serial console, the messages are not dis

Re: memtest86+ can not link: binutils issue?

2008-10-31 Thread Nate Eldredge
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 30/10/2008 20:46 Peter Jeremy said the following: On 2008-Oct-30 18:08:35 +0200, Andriy Gapon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ld --warn-constructors --warn-common -static -T memtest_shared.lds \ -o memtest_shared head.o reloc.o main.o test.o init.o

strange behaviour with /sbin/init and serial console

2008-10-31 Thread Thierry Herbelot
Hello, with the following patch on /sbin/init, I have two different behaviours depending on the console type (on a i386/32 PC) : - on a video console, I see the expected two messages, - on a serial console, the messages are not displayed (init silently finishes its job and gets to start /etc/rc

Re: open(2) and O_NOATIME

2008-10-31 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 02:48:42PM +0100, Paul Schenkeveld wrote: > utimes(2) allows non-root users to (re)set atime provided they own the > file or have write permission. Having O_NOATIME follow the same rules > would not break any assumed security any further than utimes(2) already > does but gr

Re: open(2) and O_NOATIME

2008-10-31 Thread Paul Schenkeveld
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 08:04:48AM +, Igor Mozolevsky wrote: > 2008/10/31 Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > ... If that's what you were referring to, then possibly making O_NOATIME > > only to root would be a suitable compromise. > > And no systems are compromised with rootkits?.. u

Re: memtest86+ can not link: binutils issue?

2008-10-31 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 30/10/2008 20:46 Peter Jeremy said the following: > On 2008-Oct-30 18:08:35 +0200, Andriy Gapon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 1. obtain and extract >> http://www.memtest.org/download/2.01/memtest86+-2.01.bin.gz > > This is a compressed bootable image and can't be compiled. Possibly > you mean

Re: Is there virtualbox ports?

2008-10-31 Thread Lars Engels
Quoting Boern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi,all: I am ready to intall sun xVM VirtualBox on my FreeBSD7.0,but have no found in the ports,anybody can help me? VirtualBox doesn't work on FreeBSD... pgpOXLlePpZcx.pgp Description: Digitale PGP-Unterschrift

Re: open(2) and O_NOATIME

2008-10-31 Thread Igor Mozolevsky
2008/10/31 Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > ... If that's what you were referring to, then possibly making O_NOATIME > only to root would be a suitable compromise. And no systems are compromised with rootkits?.. Igor :-) ___ freebsd-hackers@free

Re: Is there virtualbox ports?

2008-10-31 Thread Carlos A. M. dos Santos
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 7:23 AM, Boern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi,all: > I am ready to intall sun xVM VirtualBox on my FreeBSD7.0,but have no > found in the ports,anybody can help me? There is no port. VirtualBox depends on a kernel module that was not ported to FreeBSD yet, among other thi

Is there virtualbox ports?

2008-10-31 Thread Boern
Hi,all: I am ready to intall sun xVM VirtualBox on my FreeBSD7.0,but have no found in the ports,anybody can help me? -- Boern Parx ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe,