> I have a disk that is laid out with partion 0 being NTFS and 1
> being FreeBSD. I want to remove the NTFS partition and grow the
> FreeBSD one but all the docs I have seen only talk about how to
> do this if the new part of the partition is at the end of the
> partition you wish to grow. How do
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Aryeh M. Friedman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a disk that is laid out with partion 0 being NTFS and 1 being
> FreeBSD. I want to remove the NTFS partition and grow the FreeBSD one but
> all the docs I have seen only talk about how to do this if the new part
My buddy helped me install Apache Webserver but there is somthing wrong when
I try to password protect my directories? I already created '.htaccess' &
'htpasswd' and but I still cannot password protect the directory... I know
there is a command to do this 'htpasswd -c .htpasswd' fred but it dosn't
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 07:22:20PM -0400, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
> I have a disk that is laid out with partion 0 being NTFS and 1 being
> FreeBSD. I want to remove the NTFS partition and grow the FreeBSD one
> but all the docs I have seen only talk about how to do this if the new
> part of
I have a disk that is laid out with partion 0 being NTFS and 1 being
FreeBSD. I want to remove the NTFS partition and grow the FreeBSD one
but all the docs I have seen only talk about how to do this if the new
part of the partition is at the end of the partition you wish to grow.
How do I go
Danny Braniss wrote:
I know, but I get about 1mgb, which seems somewhat low :-(
If you don't tell iperf how much bandwidth to use for a UDP test, it
defaults to 1Mbps.
See -b option.
http://dast.nlanr.net/projects/Iperf/iperfdocs_1.7.0.php#bandwidth
--eli
--
Eli Dart
ES
Have you also posted this to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rik
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
Good day.
A while ago I had created the new utility that serves as VuXML
filter for the installed packages:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/126853
My primary intention was to speed up the process of
On 20080927 04:38:53, Colin Percival wrote:
> I missed the beginning of this thread, but looking back in the archives...
>
> 1. I'm very confident that FreeBSD Update is distributing the updated
> libpthread.so.
Right.
> 2. If you run ident on the libpthread.so.2 which FreeBS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've CCd in cperciva@ to see what he thinks...
I missed the beginning of this thread, but looking back in the archives...
1. I'm very confident that FreeBSD Update is distributing the updated
libpthread.so.
2. If you run ident on the libpthread.so.2 which FreeBSD Upda
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Danny Braniss wrote:
>
> > after more testing, it seems it's related to changes made between Aug 4 and
> > Aug 29 ie, a kernel built on Aug 4 works fine, Aug 29 is slow. I'l now try
> > and close the gap.
>
> I think this is the best way forward -- skimming August changes
On 20080927 13:15:15, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> Errata's are distributed with freebsd-update just like advisories.
>
> Since freebsd-update 2 (the one in the base system) /usr/src is also
> updated if it exists. That said, note that freebsd-update does not
> get's pat
On 20080927 03:59:28, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 10:17:33AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> The man page for it states that it's a binary updater for pieces in the
> base system, so you looking at your *source* files would indicate
> absolutely noth
On 2008.09.27 03:59:28 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> The advisory explicitly goes over what files were changed, and what
> revisions include the fix. The below versions include the fix. If you
> have older versions, then the answer is no, you do not have the fix.
>
> http://security.freebsd.or
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 10:17:33AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 20080927 00:07:57, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > I'm sure it's there..
> > it may be a different problem of course.
> >
>
> I don't know... Checking with ident gives:
>
>
On Sat, 27 Sep 2008, Mike Price wrote:
I need to tunnel all of my TCP SSH-2 traffic from my
local box to my remote box that I will have an account on. I heard this can
be done in one command?
ssh -f [EMAIL PROTECTED] -L :lab.com:53 -N
SOCKS:
SSH2: 53
If you want you use SOCKS
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Danny Braniss wrote:
after more testing, it seems it's related to changes made between Aug 4 and
Aug 29 ie, a kernel built on Aug 4 works fine, Aug 29 is slow. I'l now try
and close the gap.
I think this is the best way forward -- skimming August changes, there are a
num
I need to tunnel all of my TCP SSH-2 traffic from my
local box to my remote box that I will have an account on. I heard this can
be done in one command?
ssh -f [EMAIL PROTECTED] -L :lab.com:53 -N
SOCKS:
SSH2: 53
What am I doing wrong?
___
f
On 20080927 00:07:57, Julian Elischer wrote:
> I'm sure it's there..
> it may be a different problem of course.
>
I don't know... Checking with ident gives:
$FreeBSD: src/lib/libpthread/thread/thr_kern.c,v 1.116.2.1 2006/03/16 23:29:07
deischen Exp $
The patch claims &q
> --==_Exmh_1222467420_5817P
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> David,
>
> You beat me to it.
>
> Danny, read the iperf man page:
>-b, --bandwidth n[KM]
> set target bandwidth to n bits/sec (default 1 Mbit/sec). This
>
:how can I see the IP fragment reassembly statistics?
:
:thanks,
: danny
netstat -s
Also look for unexpected dropped packets, dropped fragments, and
errors during the test and such, they are counted in the statistics
as well.
-Matt
>
> :>-vfs.nfs.realign_test: 22141777
> :>+vfs.nfs.realign_test: 498351
> :>
> :>-vfs.nfsrv.realign_test: 5005908
> :>+vfs.nfsrv.realign_test: 0
> :>
> :>+vfs.nfsrv.commit_miss: 0
> :>+vfs.nfsrv.commit_blks: 0
> :>
> :> changing them did nothing - or at least with respec
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20080927 01:06:22, Daniel Eischen wrote:
It's not security related, so I don't know whether it would be in a
binary update. You should follow the procedure listed in the links
above.
I'm not sure either. In every description I see of freebsd-up
22 matches
Mail list logo
